GRC platforms
Asked as “GRC platform”, and as “governance, risk and compliance tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · Vanta 15%
19Hyperproof15Vanta14ZenGRC53others
19% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Hyperproof held the lead, +3 points on 12%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vanta30%Contested▲+7Since September 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Hyperproof19%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 14% → 17%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
MetricStream24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: MetricStream (25%) replaces ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management (36% then, 11% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →
Vanta30%Contested▲+7Since September 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketHyperproof19%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 14% → 17%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseMetricStream24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: MetricStream (25%) replaces ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management (36% then, 11% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Hyperproof19%3%30accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 15%
Hyperproof19%3%30accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 15%02Vanta15%20%51accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 14% → 17%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 17%
Vanta15%20%51accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 14% → 17%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 17%03
ZenGRC14%10%29accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 7% → 15%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 15%
ZenGRC14%10%29accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 7% → 15%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 15%04
Drata12%14%50accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 5% → 13%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 13%
Drata12%14%50accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 5% → 13%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 13%05
Secureframe5%18%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Secureframe5%18%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%06
LogicGate3%5%22accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%
LogicGate3%5%22accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%07
LogicGate Risk Cloud3%6%16accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 2%
LogicGate Risk Cloud3%6%16accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 2%08
Sprinto3%8%12accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%
Sprinto3%8%12accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%09
AuditBoard2%14%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
AuditBoard2%14%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Archer0%78%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Archer0%78%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%57%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%57%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12MetricStream0%52%31criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
MetricStream0%52%31criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
OneTrust GRC0%50%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneTrust GRC0%50%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
IBM OpenPages0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
IBM OpenPages0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Hyperproof vs SecureframeHyperproof vs LogicGateHyperproof vs LogicGate Risk CloudHyperproof vs SprintoVanta vs ZenGRCVanta vs DrataVanta vs SecureframeVanta vs LogicGateVanta vs LogicGate Risk CloudVanta vs SprintoZenGRC vs DrataZenGRC vs SecureframeZenGRC vs LogicGateZenGRC vs LogicGate Risk CloudZenGRC vs SprintoDrata vs SecureframeDrata vs LogicGateDrata vs LogicGate Risk CloudDrata vs SprintoSecureframe vs LogicGateSecureframe vs LogicGate Risk CloudSecureframe vs SprintoLogicGate vs LogicGate Risk CloudLogicGate vs SprintoLogicGate Risk Cloud vs Sprinto
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Hyperproof19%
Hyperproof19%02Vanta15%
Vanta15%03ZenGRC14%
ZenGRC14%04Drata12%
Drata12%05Secureframe5%
Secureframe5%06LogicGate3%
LogicGate3%07LogicGate Risk Cloud3%
LogicGate Risk Cloud3%08Sprinto3%
Sprinto3%09AuditBoard2%
AuditBoard2%10IBM OpenPages0%
IBM OpenPages0%11OneTrust GRC0%
OneTrust GRC0%12MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%13ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%14Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management57%
24 of 42 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Group B: Traditional/Enterprise GRC (Avoid for now) *Examples:* ServiceNow, OneTrust, RSA Archer.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt
Archer78%
21 of 27 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“The platforms to be *most* cautious about are **Archer** and **MetricStream** (heavy, expensive, legacy UX)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
MetricStream52%
16 of 31 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“**Verdict:** Best avoided unless you're a massive enterprise with a dedicated GRC operations team” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
OneTrust GRC50%
9 of 18 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Reddit practitioners frequently say *"100% do not recommend"*” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1052 links across 221 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 3 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · RiskWatch37 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ZenGRC32 answers · 53 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Vanta31 answers · 44 citations · 13 models
28 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · MetricStream28 answers · 31 citations · 13 models
vendor site · ComplyJet27 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SureCloud24 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Enzuzo17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best grc platform”, “grc platform”, “grc platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperproof hyperproof.io | 19% | 142 | 1,600 | 37 | 64,238 | $59 | 34 | 2 |
| Vanta vanta.com | 15% | 500 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | ||
| ZenGRC zengrc.com | 14% | 62 | 480 | 4 | 29,603 | 9 | ||
| Drata drata.com | 12% | 390 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | ||
| SimpleRisk simplerisk.com | 10% | 30 | 210 | 1 | 236 | 4 | ||
| Eramba eramba.org Eramba 5%, Eramba Community 2% | 7% | 16 | 390 | 5 | 364 | 0 | ||
| Secureframe secureframe.com | 5% | 232 | 2,400 | 39 | 45,014 | 27 | ||
| LogicGate logicgate.ai | 3% | 96 | 18,100 | 70 | 421 | 31 | ||
| LogicGate Risk Cloud logicgate.com | 3% | 49 | 170 | 2 | 15,071 | 0 | ||
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 3% | 234 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (metricstream.com). The first result for “best grc platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best GRC platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which governance, risk and compliance tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top GRC platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best GRC platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a GRC platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which GRC platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DrataLogicGate Risk CloudChangedno first choiceagainst: ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSprintono first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Optro, SAI360, ServiceNow GRC Suite
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, VComply, VantaFive alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, VComply, VantaFour alternatives
MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Optro, VantaThree alternatives
LogicManager, Risk Cognizance, SecureframeGPT-5.4 miniLogicGateagainst: ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementVantaChangedServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMitti, TeamMate Risk & Complianceagainst: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, LogicGate, Onspringno first choiceagainst: Continuum GRC, MasterControl, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, OptroThree alternatives
Centraleyes, Drata, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFive alternatives
Aravo, Archer, AuditBoard, LogicGate, MetricStreamGemini 3.5 FlashDrata, Vantaagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementVantaChangedagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementDrata, VantaEramba, SimpleRiskagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Vanta
Four alternatives
AuditBoard, Compyl, Hyperproof, LogicGateThree alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, LogicGateTen alternatives
Archer, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Optro, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, WorkivaFive alternatives
CISO Assistant, ComplyJet, RealCISO, Scrut Automation, SprintoPerplexity SonarHyperproofHyperproofHeldno first choiceSprintoagainst: Dratano first choiceagainst: Archer, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Riskonnect, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Two alternatives
LogicGate, ZenGRCFour alternatives
Drata, LogicGate, Resolver, VantaOne alternative
6clicksGrok 4.1 FastLogicGate, ZenGRCHyperproofChangedagainst: IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMetricStream, VantaComplyJetagainst: AuditBoard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Iru, MetricStream, NAVEX One, OneTrust GRC, Oracle GRC, SAP Risk Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta, ZenGRC
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, HyperproofFour alternatives
Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Vanta, ZenGRCSix alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, Drata, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
CISO Assistant, Drata, Sprinto, VantaThree alternatives
Drata, LogicGate, VantaMistral SmallAuditBoard, ZenGRCZenGRCChangedno first choiceEramba, SimpleRiskno first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
RiskWatch, StandardFusion, VantaThree alternatives
AuditBoard, RiskWatch, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
AuditBoard, OpenGRC, ZenGRCDeepSeek V4 FlashHyperproofDrataChangedagainst: AuditBoard, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMetricStreamagainst: ArcherSecureframeagainst: VantaVantaagainst: Archer, MetricStreamagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Secureframe, Vanta, ZenGRC
Four alternatives
Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Vanta, ZenGRCFour alternatives
LogicGate, Orbiq, Secureframe, VantaEight alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust GRC, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, SymbiantFive alternatives
CoreStream, Drata, Hyperproof, RiskWatch, SureCloudLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMetricStream GRCChangedno first choiceno first choiceDrata, Vantanothing named
Two alternatives
RiskWatch GRC Software, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
AuditBoardQwen 3.7 FlashZenGRCagainst: ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementDrata, VantaChangedagainst: Archerno first choiceSimpleRiskagainst: Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementDrata, Hyperproof, Secureframe, Vantaagainst: Archer, AuditBoard, Diligent One, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Drata, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Securitum, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Splunk, Vanta
Four alternatives
AuditBoard, Centraleyes, Drata, VantaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, WhisticThree alternatives
ClickUp, Notion, VantaKimi K2Hyperproof, ZenGRCagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementZenGRCChangedDiligent Oneagainst: ArcherSimpleRiskDrata, Vantaagainst: MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Archer, MetricStream, NAVEX, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, ZenGRC
Three alternatives
Drata, Onspring, VantaThree alternatives
Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, VantaSeven alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaThree alternatives
Eramba, StandardFusion, ZenGRCFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, LogicGate, RiskWatchGLM 4.7 FlashXVanta, ZenGRCHyperproofChangedagainst: LogicGate Risk Cloudno first choiceSimpleRiskagainst: ClickUp, Drata, Secureframe, Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer, IBM OpenPages, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta
Three alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk CloudOne alternative
ZenGRCThree alternatives
CISO Assistant, Eramba, OpenGRCMiniMax M2.5Hyperproofagainst: OneTrust GRCZenGRCChangedno first choiceEramba, SimpleRiskno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
AuditBoard, LogicGate Risk CloudThree alternatives
Apptega, RiskWatch, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
6clicks, Drata, LogicGate, ZenGRCGPT-6 LunaHyperproofHyperproofHeldno first choiceEramba Communityno first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStream, SOC 2/compliance-automation tools, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Two alternatives
Drata, VantaOne alternative
VantaSeven alternatives
Archer, Diligent One, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Optro, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Drata, SprintoMuse Glimmer 30BLogicGate Risk CloudHyperproofChangedno first choiceSecureframeagainst: Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer – RSA, Drata, Freshservice, HaloITSM, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, Vanta, ZenGRCOne alternative
LogicGate Risk CloudFive alternatives
Drata, Eramba, SimpleRisk, Sprinto, ZenGRCBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 21 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 29 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:34 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 20 | 107 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 20 | 87 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 8 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 15 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:54 | yes | 32 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 21 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 8 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:07 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:40 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:27 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:25 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 1 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:27 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
Diligent (One Platform) read as Diligent One
OneTrust read as OneTrust GRC
SAP read as SAP GRC
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow (GRC Pro) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Archer – RSA
Continuum GRC
Eramba Community
RiskWatch GRC Software
SAP Risk Management
SOC 2/compliance-automation tools
Securitum
ServiceNow GRC Suite
Spiceworks IT Desktop
Symbiant
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.