Every category where a model named Tines for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SOAR platforms	Security operations	47%	1 of 49	0%	48	endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tines yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tines across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	6	0	0	6
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	3	1	6
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	3	0	6
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	3
Kimi K2	3	3	0	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	1	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	2	2	1	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct24 labels18

Paraphrase15 labels9

Comparative29 labels11not counted in share

Budget-constrained23 labels14

Scale-constrained16 labels5

Negative17 labels7not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative124 labels in all, every segment counted; 46 of the 64 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tines: Renowned for its incredible ease of use, robust API connectivity, and powerful no-code workflow engine. Highly popular among mid-market teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · scale prompt · first choice

“a free/open-source option like Tines Community Edition... Community Edition is free and still provides meaningful capability” Perplexity Sonar · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice

“the best SOAR platform is usually Tines if you want the strongest balance of usability, low maintenance, and no-code automation” Perplexity Sonar · SOAR · direct prompt · first choice

“the best SOAR platform for a company with a limited budget is Tines (Community Edition) or Splunk SOAR (Community License)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tines, over the 124 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tines was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Splunk SOAR100 of 1244Not in the top three

Cortex XSOAR91 of 12418Not in the top three

Torq72 of 1240Not in the top three

Microsoft Sentinel52 of 1240Not in the top three

Swimlane44 of 1242Not in the top three

Rapid7 InsightConnect37 of 1244Compare →

IBM QRadar SOAR37 of 1240Not in the top three

Shuffle31 of 1242Compare →

FortiSOAR31 of 1241Not in the top three

Swimlane Turbine24 of 1244Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tines. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 104 of the 124 answers that named Tines and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com75

blinkops.com62

gartner.com62

aimultiple.com47

comparitech.com42

expertinsights.com37

soarpricing.com35

strike48.com33

checkthat.ai31

eastbaycyber.com31

455 of the 455 domain citations in answers naming Tines came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/soar-tools-comparison75

blinkops.com/blog/soar-platforms61

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-solutions61

aimultiple.com/top-soar-platforms46

comparitech.com/net-admin/best-soar-software42

expertinsights.com/network-security/the-top-soar-solutions35

eastbaycyber.com/content/compare-best-soar-platforms-compared-202631

soarpricing.com/31

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tines

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tines; a claim can dispute any of them.

Tines (Community Edition) 2Tines Community Edition 2Tines (Community & Starter Editions) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tines's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tines, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tines.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.