| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 41% | 1 of 67 | 2% | 48 | endorsed leader | ▼−10Since September 2026: 47% → 37%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI SOC agents | Security operations | 0% | 102 of 104 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR | 47% | 37% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 47% → 37%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 67, unchanged |
| AI SOC agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 102 of 104, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I recommend starting with Tines if you want rapid implementation and ease of use, or Cortex XSOAR if you need the most comprehensive platform” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SOAR · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for low-code automation: Tines, for security and operations teams that build orchestration-heavy workflows without heavy scripting.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · scale prompt · first choice
“Tines | Analyst-friendly, low-code, strong mid-market fit, median $52K/yr | Teams wanting speed and minimal engineering overhead” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · scale prompt · first choice
“Zero spend, no ops overhead: Tines Community Edition is the simplest cloud free tier for a small team to start automating” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tines has a free edition, but it allows only 3 live workflows, so it's better for a proof of concept than a full company-wide deployment.” GPT-6 Luna · SOAR · budget prompt · soft negative
“Broad but shallow: Torq, Tines—connect to many tools but may lack deep contextual sharing.” Kimi K2 · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 142 of the 148 answers that named Tines and are not a share of its labels.
503 of the 503 domain citations in answers naming Tines came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,148 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | SOAR, SIEM | |
| Template or tool | 905 | undated | Email security, CSPM | ||
| Conference or event | 335 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 79 | undated | GRC, SOAR | ||
| Report or ebook | 51 | undated | GRC, Patching | ||
| Case study | 42 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 42 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 37 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on tines.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page tines.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Tines's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tines.com, tines.com/pricing, trust.tines.com, tines.com/solutions/it, tines.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tines's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tines, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tines by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Tines first in SOAR platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.