AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Security operations › October 2026 Edition

SOAR platforms

Asked as “SOAR platform”, and as “security orchestration and automated response tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 61 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41Tines18Shuffle11Swimlane Turbine30others

41% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▼−10Since September 2026: 47% → 37%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Tines held the lead, −10 points on 47%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Tines41%2%48endorsed leader▼−10Since September 2026: 47% → 37%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 37%
02Shuffle18%0%16accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 11% → 18%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 18%
03Swimlane Turbine11%0%34accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 4% → 12%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 12%
04Torq8%10%30accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 8%
05Cortex XSOAR5%44%61criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
06Rapid7 InsightConnect3%17%18accepted challenger▼−11Since September 2026: 15% → 4%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 4%
07Microsoft Sentinel2%8%39accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
08Splunk SOAR2%44%61criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11IBM QRadar SOAR0%52%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Google Security Operations SOAR Lab in the set0%42%19criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09FortiSOAR0%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Security Operations SOAR is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Tines41%
02Shuffle18%
03Swimlane Turbine11%
04Torq8%
05Cortex XSOAR5%
06Rapid7 InsightConnect3%
07Microsoft Sentinel2%
08Splunk SOAR2%
09FortiSOAR0%
10Google Security Operations SOAR0%
11IBM QRadar SOAR0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Cortex XSOAR
44%
27 of 61 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“one source flags it as an "avoid" for a mid-size B2B company because it is enterprise/multi-team focused and has premium pricing” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Splunk SOAR
44%
27 of 61 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“avoid: ... **Splunk SOAR:** Only makes financial and operational sense if your company is already heavily standardized on Splunk” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt
IBM QRadar SOAR
52%
14 of 27 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Currently considered one of the biggest "avoid" options due to significant lifecycle and roadmap risks.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Google Security Operations SOAR
42%
8 of 19 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Google Siemplify | Absorbed into Google SecOps as its SOAR layer. The standalone product no longer exists to renew.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1046 links across 193 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 40 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

34 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks29 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Strike4828 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Intezer28 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
26 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best soar platform”, “soar platform”, “soar platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Tines tines.com41%14222,2003,16710,88897
Shuffle shuffler.io18%3460,50019,5501,726
Swimlane Turbine swimlane.com11%8950015,132376
Torq torq.io8%1426,6001,4675,9666
Cortex cortex.io
Cortex XSOAR 5%
5%1693901416,7826
Rapid7 parent site
Rapid7 InsightConnect 3%
3%4814,800798
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Sentinel 2%
2%3592,240,000403,136
Blumira blumira.com2%1101,300128,06010
D3 Security d3security.com
D3 Security Smart SOAR 2%
2%17838 company15
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Log360 2%
2%988,100675

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, paloaltonetworks.com). The first result for “best soar platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SOAR platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security orchestration and automated response tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top SOAR platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOAR platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a SOAR platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SOAR platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Four alternativesCortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines
Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane TurbineChanged
One alternativeFortiSOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Five alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, Torq
ManageEngine Log360, Tines
Six alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, StackStorm, Swimlane Turbine, TheHive with Cortex
against: Cortex XSOAR
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar, Splunk SOAR
GPT-5.4 miniTines, Torq
Three alternativesCortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOARChanged
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel
Cortex XSOAR
Six alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, Torq
Shuffle
One alternativeIBM QRadar SOAR
against: Microsoft Sentinel
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines
Four alternativesBlinkOps, Radiant Security, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Two alternativesBlinkOps, Microsoft Sentinel
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Tines, Torq
Four alternativesCortex XSOAR, D3 Security Smart SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Tines
Three alternativesShuffle, Tracecat, n8n
Tines, Torq
Four alternativesAzure Logic Apps, CrowdStrike, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Cortex
against: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, IBM QRadar SOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Securonix, Splunk SOAR
Perplexity SonarD3 Security Smart SOAR
Two alternativesManageEngine Log360, ThreatConnect
against: IBM QRadar SOAR
Cortex XSOARChanged
Three alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, ORNA
against: QRadar SOAR
Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Five alternativesCyware, Google Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, ThreatConnect
against: IBM QRadar SOAR
Shuffle
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Siemplify, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Grok 4.1 FastSwimlane Turbine
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
against: Splunk SOAR
TinesChanged
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Five alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Tines
Four alternativesBlink, Cortex XSOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Shuffle
against: Splunk SOAR, Torq
no first choice
Four alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR
Mistral SmallSwimlane Turbine, Torq
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines
DTonomy, ShuffleChanged
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, Radiant Security
Splunk SOAR
Two alternativesSwimlane Turbine, Torq
Shuffle, Tines
Two alternativesBlumira, Rapid7 InsightConnect
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Swimlane TurbineChanged
Three alternativesFortiSOAR, SIRP, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choice
Seven alternativesCortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
against: Microsoft Sentinel
Shuffle, Tines
Two alternativesBlumira, Tracecat
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Tines
Four alternativesFortiSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, IBM QRadar SOAR, LogRhythm SOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR
Llama 4 MaverickTinesno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Qwen 3.7 FlashTines
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choice
Eight alternativesIBM QRadar SOAR, Lumify, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq, XSIAM
against: Cortex XSOAR
Shuffle, Tines
Two alternativesDFLabs SOAR, n8n
no first choice
Five alternativesCortex XSOAR, Rapid7 Managed Detection, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR
Kimi K2Tines
Four alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choice
Six alternativesCortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, Torq
Shuffle, TheHive + Cortex
One alternativeRapid7 InsightConnect
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choice
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR, Tines
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Cortex XSOARChanged
One alternativeSplunk SOAR
no first choiceBlumira, Shuffle
Three alternativesOpenSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Tines
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, FortiSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Securonix SOAR
MiniMax M2.5Swimlane Turbine
Four alternativesFortiSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnectChanged
Two alternativesSwimlane Turbine, Torq
Cortex XSOAR
Five alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines
Shuffle, TheHive
One alternativeWazuh
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
GPT-6 LunaTines
Three alternativesCortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel's built-in automation, Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, Sentinel playbooks using Azure Logic Apps
no first choice
Seven alternativesCortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
Shuffle
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
against: Tines
no first choiceagainst: Cortex AgentiX, Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM Security QRadar SOAR SaaS, Splunk SOAR
Muse Glimmer 30BSwimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
Three alternativesCortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
TinesChanged
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect
Cortex XSOAR
Six alternativesD3 Security D3 SOAR, FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR
Shuffle, Tines
Two alternativesManageEngine Log360, Tracecat
Tines
Four alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex AgentiX, Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:12yes1410 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:25yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:47yes1222 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:51yes192 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:31yes2056 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:48yes127 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:36yes1921 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:08yes51 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:24no035 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:44yes1526 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:27yes2092 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:12yes512 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:54yes416 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:33yes1516 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:22yes159 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:47yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:55yes1824 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:46yes193 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:09yes206 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:00yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:53yes2125 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:57yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:39yes524 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:03yes1928 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:32yes19108 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:51yes1342 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:07yes314 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:40yes1834 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:39yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:30yes18 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:26yes1428 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:39yes207 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:42yes219 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:43yes79 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:11yes2145 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:44yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:21yes1756 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:20yes1122 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:15yes1035 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:14yes1632 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:39yes1045 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:23yes2131 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:03yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:14yes44 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:59yes1221 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:00yes193 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:49yes228 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:25yes199 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:10yes2340 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:37yes51 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:34yes1536 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:00yes1527 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:42yes1416 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:09yes516 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:11yes415 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:28yes2231 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:40no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:05no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:01no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:53yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:47yes198 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:58no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:21yes2154 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:12yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:20no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:38yes1937 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:42yes1417 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:27yes1526 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:50yes124 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:20yes1426 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:30yes1711 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:54yes37 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:40yes2126 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:23yes205 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:22yes246 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:37yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:13yes2446 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:45yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:21yes530 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:44yes1528 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:08yes2319 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:14yes1234 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:55yes527 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:48yes2231 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
D3 Security (Smart SOAR) read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
Exabeam read as Exabeam Incident Responder
Google SecOps read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google SecOps (Siemplify) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks (Cortex XSOAR) read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
ServiceNow SecOps read as ServiceNow Security Operations
Splunk read as Splunk SOAR
Swimlane read as Swimlane Turbine
Unresolved, counted raw
Cortex Agentic
CyberSponse
D3 Security D3 SOAR
DFLabs SOAR
DTonomy
Google Siemplify
Hume
IBM Security QRadar SOAR SaaS
IncMan SOAR
LogRhythm SOAR
Lumify
Microsoft Defender SOAR
Microsoft Sentinel Logic Apps
Microsoft Sentinel's built-in automation
QRadar SOAR
Rapid7 Managed Detection
Resilient
Sentinel playbooks using Azure Logic Apps
Splunk SOAR Community Edition
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← SIEMTPRM →