| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 15% | 2 of 49 | 8% | 25 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“offering the most affordable entry point with a 30-day free trial for mid-market teams. It's purpose-built for mid-market security teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SOAR · direct prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 InsightConnect and Tines are top choices due to their ease of use, low-code capabilities, and strong integration options.” Mistral Small · SOAR · direct prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 InsightConnect if you're already on Rapid7 and want fastest time-to-value, or Tines if you want maximum flexibility” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Rapid7 InsightConnect as a strong SOAR starting point.” Grok 4.1 Fast · SOAR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“the following SOAR platforms are mentioned as having drawbacks or being less desirable: 1. Rapid7 SOAR” Llama 4 Maverick · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious with Rapid7 InsightConnect / Rapid7 SOAR ... it does indicate user dissatisfaction with those products” Perplexity Sonar · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 50 answers that named Rapid7 InsightConnect and are not a share of its labels.
205 of the 205 domain citations in answers naming Rapid7 InsightConnect came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapid7 InsightConnect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapid7 InsightConnect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rapid7.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.