Cortex · 1 category · RankedCortex XSOAR
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 2% | 9 of 49 | 47% | 47 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Standout Capability: Platform-native integration across Cortex XDR... 850+ product integrations (one of the largest marketplaces)” MiniMax M2.5 · SOAR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Cortex XSOAR is widely regarded as the "best overall" enterprise SOAR, offering the widest integration ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SOAR · comparative prompt · first choice
“starting with an open-source platform like Cortex XSOAR Community Edition or Shuffle can be an excellent way” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice
“Often considered the market leader due to its extensive playbook library and strong integration capabilities.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid for a Mid-Size B2B Company - Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR — Excellent but enterprise/multi-team focused, with premium pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“customers report "broken integrations and silent failures" as the most common pain point” Kimi K2 · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-heavy like Cortex XSOAR/Splunk SOAR” Grok 4.1 Fast · SOAR · direct prompt · hard negative
“Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR — Avoid for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · SOAR · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 114 of the 139 answers that named Cortex XSOAR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
474 of the 474 domain citations in answers naming Cortex XSOAR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Cortex XSOAR
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cortex XSOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cortex XSOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cortex.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.