AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Security operations › SIEM › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

SIEM platforms for enterprise buyers

Asked as “SIEM platform”, and as “security information and event management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Microsoft Sentinel
Clear leader
41Microsoft Sentinel26Splunk Enterprise Security09Google Security Operations24others

41% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▲+12Since September 2026: 30% → 42%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Microsoft Sentinel held the lead, +12 points on 30%, past the floor.
ShowinginAll 136 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessBlumira34%Contested▲+6Since September 2026: 28% → 35%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Sentinel38%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 41% → 39%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Sentinel41%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 30% → 42%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This page

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Microsoft Sentinel41%17%72endorsed leader▲+12Since September 2026: 30% → 42%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.30% → 42%
02Splunk Enterprise Security26%24%68accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 28% → 27%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 27%
03Google Security Operations Lab in the set9%0%30accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 11%
04Exabeam6%10%41accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%
05IBM QRadar6%35%55criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
06Securonix Unified Defense SIEM2%17%30accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
07Rapid7 InsightIDR2%20%15accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 2%
08LogRhythm2%43%21criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Elastic Security0%11%38accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
11CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM0%4%25accepted challenger▼−15Since September 2026: 15% → 0%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Security Operations is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models four times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to head
Microsoft Sentinel vs WazuhMicrosoft Sentinel vs Rapid7 InsightIDRMicrosoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Microsoft Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360Microsoft Sentinel vs Sumo Logic Cloud SIEMMicrosoft Sentinel vs LogRhythmWazuh vs Rapid7 InsightIDRWazuh vs Elastic SecurityWazuh vs ManageEngine Log360Wazuh vs Sumo Logic Cloud SIEMWazuh vs LogRhythmRapid7 InsightIDR vs Elastic SecurityRapid7 InsightIDR vs ManageEngine Log360Rapid7 InsightIDR vs Sumo Logic Cloud SIEMRapid7 InsightIDR vs LogRhythmElastic Security vs ManageEngine Log360Elastic Security vs Sumo Logic Cloud SIEMElastic Security vs LogRhythmManageEngine Log360 vs Sumo Logic Cloud SIEMManageEngine Log360 vs LogRhythmSumo Logic Cloud SIEM vs LogRhythm

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Sentinel41%
02Splunk Enterprise Security26%
03Google Security Operations9%
04Exabeam6%
05IBM QRadar6%
06Securonix Unified Defense SIEM2%
07Rapid7 InsightIDR2%
08LogRhythm2%
09Elastic Security0%
10Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM0%
11CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM0%
12Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM0%

What they warned about

Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
IBM QRadar
35%
19 of 55 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“IBM has shifted focus away from on-prem QRadar; ... long-term viability is limited, and the licensing model can become expensive and hard to scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Microsoft Sentinel
17%
12 of 72 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictability - Splunk ES, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo Logic, Elastic: Primarily per-GB” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
Splunk Enterprise Security
24%
16 of 68 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictability - **Splunk ES, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo Logic, Elastic**: Primarily per-GB” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
LogRhythm
43%
9 of 21 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Frequently criticized for lacking adequate community support, poor documentation, and scalability issues, making it a risky choice for large, complex environments.” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1053 links across 250 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

underdefense.com
vendor site · UnderDefense52 answers · 60 citations · 12 models
exabeam.com
vendor site · Exabeam32 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
paloaltonetworks.com
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks32 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
manageengine.com
vendor site · ManageEngine25 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
splunk.com
vendor site · Splunk24 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
panther.com
vendor site · Panther22 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
netwitness.com
vendor site · NetWitness20 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
expertinsights.com
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
kaseya.com
vendor site · Kaseya18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
puppygraph.com
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
solutionsreview.com
15 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
learn.microsoft.com
vendor site · Microsoft13 answers · 23 citations · 5 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison
44 answers · 12 models
paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/siem-tools-comparison
27 answers · 10 models
panther.com/blog/best-siem-tools
21 answers · 11 models
manageengine.com/log-management/top-siem-tools.html
20 answers · 8 models
netwitness.com/blog/top-siem-solutions-for-enterprises
20 answers · 11 models
expertinsights.com/security-operations/the-top-siem-solutions
18 answers · 8 models
kaseya.com/blog/best-siem-tools
18 answers · 9 models
exabeam.com/explainers/siem-tools/siem-buyers-guide
17 answers · 8 models
puppygraph.com/learn/enterprise-siem-tools
16 answers · 8 models
techrepublic.com/article/siem-tools
13 answers · 8 models

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best siem platform”, “siem platform”, “siem platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Sentinel 41%		41%3592,240,000403,136
Splunk parent site
Splunk Enterprise Security 26%		26%17040,5006,832
Google Security Operations google.dev9%853905881,346109
Exabeam exabeam.com
Exabeam 6%, LogRhythm 2%		7%901,9008266,72305
IBM parent site
IBM QRadar 6%		6%128201,00034,098
Securonix Unified Defense SIEM securonix.com2%452003,571$139
Rapid7 parent site
Rapid7 InsightIDR 2%		2%11514,800798
Google Chronicle SIEM2%
Google SecOps Enterprise or Enterprise Plus2%
Sophos Fusion SIEM2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (exabeam.com, manageengine.com, panther.com, underdefense.com). The first result for “best siem platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SIEM platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security information and event management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SIEM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SIEM platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SIEM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SIEM platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Two alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise SecurityHeld
Three alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
no first choiceGoogle Chronicle SIEM
Two alternativesExabeam, Rapid7 InsightIDR
against: Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Splunk Enterprise Security
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Sentinel
Three alternativesGoogle Security Operations, IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft SentinelHeld
Two alternativesPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: LogRhythmMicrosoft Sentinel
One alternativeSplunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: Elastic Security, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Rapid7 InsightIDR
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Sentinel
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Google Security Operations, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft SentinelHeld
Three alternativesGoogle Security Operations, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadarGoogle Security Operations
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightIDR, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
against: Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceagainst: ELK Stack, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, ManageEngine Log360, OpenText ArcSight, SolarWinds Security Event Manager, Splunk Enterprise Security
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Sentinel
Two alternativesIBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft SentinelHeld
Four alternativesIBM QRadar, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise Security
Six alternativesExabeam, Google Security Operations, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Google Security Operations
Three alternativesBlumira, ConnectWise SIEM, Stellar Cyber Next-Gen SIEM
no first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, Exabeam, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, SentinelOne, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM, Wazuh
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Sentinel
One alternativeSplunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft SentinelHeld
Two alternativesElastic Security, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choice
Seven alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, Exabeam, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Google Security Operations
Six alternativesBlumira, CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Exabeam, Huntress Managed SIEM, Rapid7 InsightIDR, SentinelOne
against: Elastic Security, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEMno first choice
Four alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
against: IBM QRadar, Micro Focus ArcSight, Splunk Enterprise Security
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Two alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar
Exabeam, Splunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
Three alternativesIBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, NetWitness SIEM
Splunk Enterprise Security
Five alternativesElastic Security, FortiSIEM, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel
Rapid7 InsightIDR
One alternativeElastic Security
no first choiceagainst: LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel
DeepSeek V4 FlashSplunk Enterprise Security
Three alternativesGoogle Security Operations, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise SecurityChangedagainst: IBM QRadarno first choiceGoogle Security Operations
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Panther
against: Datadog Cloud SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEMno first choiceagainst: AlienVault USM, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM, McAfee ESM, NetWitness, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Two alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise SecurityHeld
Two alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar
no first choiceLogRhythm
Three alternativesElastic Security, FortiSIEM, Microsoft Sentinel
against: Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choice
Seven alternativesDatadog Cloud SIEM, Elastic Security, Google Security Operations, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Wazuh
against: Splunk Enterprise Securityagainst: IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Kimi K2Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
against: IBM QRadarSplunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
Two alternativesGoogle Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel
against: IBM QRadarSplunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Google Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Google Security Operations, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
One alternativeExabeam
against: IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, OSSIM, OpenText ArcSight, SIEMonster, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Sentinel
Three alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
Three alternativesIBM QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel
Splunk Enterprise Security
Six alternativesExabeam, Google Chronicle Security Operations, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
IBM QRadar
Three alternativesElastic Security, LogRhythm SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel
no first choiceagainst: Elastic Securityagainst: HP ArcSight, IBM QRadar, IBM QRadar SaaS, Logpoint, Symantec Reporter, Traditional LogRhythm
MiniMax M2.5IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel
Three alternativesExabeam, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud
Exabeam, Splunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
Two alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel
Splunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Exabeam
One alternativeSecuronix Unified Defense SIEM
against: Blumira, Microsoft SentinelMicrosoft Sentinel
Three alternativesIBM QRadar, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
against: Exabeam, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Sentinel
Three alternativesElastic Security, Google Security Operations, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft SentinelHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Security Operations, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choice
Eight alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, Exabeam, Google Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
against: IBM QRadarGoogle SecOps Enterprise or Enterprise Plus
Two alternativesElastic Security, Microsoft Sentinel
no first choiceagainst: Exabeam, IBM QRadar SaaS products acquired by Palo Alto Networks, IBM QRadar on-premises, Microsoft Sentinel
Muse Glimmer 30BSplunk Enterprise Security
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
One alternativeIBM QRadar
Splunk Enterprise Security
Three alternativesGoogle Security Operations, formerly Chronicle, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
against: IBM QRadarIBM QRadar, Logpoint, Sophos Fusion SIEMagainst: Microsoft Sentinelno first choice
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Rapid7 InsightIDR
against: Exabeam, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Splunk Enterprise Security
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:27no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:51yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:38yes2127 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:53yes184 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:07yes2014 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:43yes156 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:51yes1831 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:12yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:23no034 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:07yes1431 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:53yes2253 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:55yes518 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:39yes415 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:29yes1519 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:49no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:51yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:42yes1022 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:17yes197 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:43yes198 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:42yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:19yes2434 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:48yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:51yes926 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:22yes1314 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:55yes1023 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:38yes534 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:22yes414 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 07:59yes1320 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:58yes1612 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:04yes916 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:00yes2025 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:54yes196 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:53yes2111 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:23yes1511 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:59yes2344 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:24yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:18yes522 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:14yes1933 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:18yes2444 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:28yes2252 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:31yes925 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:12yes1340 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:12yes169 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:44yes26 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:49yes1829 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:44yes193 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:15yes2111 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:07yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:38yes2140 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:18yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:50no043 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:20yes2023 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:45yes1986 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:40yes1536 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:00yes421 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:19yes1129 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:19no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:09no010 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:22no019 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:01yes287 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:53yes259 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:37no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:33yes2568 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:37yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:55yes536 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:01yes2432 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:41yes2571 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:30yes522 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:28yes422 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:28yes1435 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:46yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:32yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:55yes1832 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:48yes184 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:33yes2110 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:58yes53 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:23yes2452 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:35yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:57yes530 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:19yes2525 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:45yes2455 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:53yes536 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:29yes421 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:45yes2234 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ArcSight read as OpenText ArcSight
ArcSight (by OpenText) read as OpenText ArcSight
Cortex XSIAM read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud SIEM
Datadog Security read as Datadog Cloud SIEM
Elastic read as Elastic Security
Elastic Cloud read as Elastic Security
Exabeam Fusion read as Exabeam
Google Chronicle read as Google Security Operations
Google Chronicle (now part of Google Security Operations) read as Google Security Operations
Google SecOps read as Google Security Operations
Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle) read as Google Security Operations
Microsoft read as Microsoft Sentinel
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightIDR
Rapid7 Incident Command read as Rapid7 InsightIDR
Securonix read as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Securonix (Unified Defense SIEM) read as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Splunk read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk (now Cisco) read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Cloud read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Cloud Platform read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Stellar Cyber read as Stellar Cyber Next-Gen SIEM
Sumo Logic read as Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Unresolved, counted raw
ConnectWise SIEM
Elastic Stack SIEM
Google Chronicle SIEM
Google Chronicle Security Operations
Google SecOps Enterprise or Enterprise Plus
Google Security Operations, formerly Chronicle
IBM QRadar SaaS products acquired by Palo Alto Networks
IBM QRadar on-premises
IBM's QRadar SaaS assets
McAfee ESM
SIEMonster
SentinelOne's Singularity AI SIEM
Sophos Fusion SIEM
Sumo Logic Cloud
Symantec Reporter (on-premises)
Traditional LogRhythm (on-premises)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.

Also in security operations

The other categories of this function, with the leader in each.
← Awareness trainingSOAR →