| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 0% | 16 of 49 | 25% | 20 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose IBM QRadar SOAR if compliance and standardized incident response are top priorities” Kimi K2 · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“A robust, enterprise-grade solution that tightly couples with IBM\u2019s QRadar SIEM.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong for larger enterprises with complex incident-response and compliance needs.” GPT-5.4 mini · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Highly regulated, risk-averse, or on-premises enterprise environments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“This is arguably the biggest "avoid" right now, primarily due to lifecycle/roadmap risk” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequent integration issues, API performance problems, app quality complaints” Kimi K2 · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for new deployments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Known vulnerabilities: Has had multiple security advisories ... Recommendation: Requires vigilant patching and security updates.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 63 answers that named IBM QRadar SOAR and are not a share of its labels.
239 of the 239 domain citations in answers naming IBM QRadar SOAR came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM QRadar SOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM QRadar SOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ibm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.