Every category where a model named IBM QRadar SOAR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SOAR platforms	Security operations	0%	67 of 67	52%	27	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Incident management and on-call	IT operations and endpoint	0%	52 of 65	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 32%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Business continuity management	Security operations	0%	104 of 114	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, IBM QRadar SOAR held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · SOAR · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 → 61 of 62

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 56 of 56

Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 5% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 41

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
SOAR	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 15 → 67 of 67
Incidents	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 52 of 65, unchanged
Business continuity	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 104 of 114, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated IBM QRadar SOAR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	3	4
Grok 4.20	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	2	3
Kimi K2	1	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase11 labelsNone

Comparative25 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative23 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative89 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Exceptional case management and breach response tracking; designed for incident response teams that need rigorous audit trails” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose IBM QRadar SOAR if compliance, breach workflows, and enterprise process control are top priorities.” GPT-5.4 mini · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Regulated industries requiring breach response workflows and audit-ready documentation” MiniMax M2.5 · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for regulated industries that need privacy breach workflows baked into incident response” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Currently considered one of the biggest "avoid" options due to significant lifecycle and roadmap risks.” Mistral Small · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative

“At least one analysis explicitly recommends avoiding due to uncertainty about future development” MiniMax M2.5 · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative

“explicitly flagged by analysts as potentially the biggest "avoid" right now” Kimi K2 · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative

“has been flagged as a potential "avoid" due to lifecycle/roadmap risk.” Llama 4 Maverick · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM QRadar SOAR, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM QRadar SOAR was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Splunk SOAR81 of 898Not among the top eight

Cortex XSOAR76 of 8925Not among the top eight

Microsoft Sentinel45 of 892Not among the top eight

Tines39 of 8910Not among the top eight

Swimlane Turbine35 of 894Not among the top eight

Google Security Operations SOAR33 of 892Not among the top eight

Torq30 of 892Not among the top eight

Rapid7 InsightConnect16 of 890Not among the top eight

ServiceNow Security Operations15 of 890Not among the top eight

ManageEngine Log36013 of 893Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM QRadar SOAR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 83 of the 89 answers that named IBM QRadar SOAR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com54

intezer.com52

checkthat.ai49

zendikt.com39

strike48.com37

startupstash.com36

paloaltonetworks.com35

comparitech.com32

guideflow.com31

csoonline.com28

393 of the 393 domain citations in answers naming IBM QRadar SOAR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

intezer.com/guides/soar-security/soar-platform-guide50

aimultiple.com/top-soar-platforms48

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-soar-tools-available48

zendikt.com/top-10-soar-software39

startupstash.com/security-orchestration-tools36

comparitech.com/net-admin/best-soar-software32

strike48.com/post/top-soar-platforms32

guideflow.com/blog/soar-software31

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where IBM QRadar SOAR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“ibm qradar soar”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Its own site: It sits on IBM's site (ibm.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 67 of 67 in SOAR

Segment leader

41%

Tines

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 89 answers
Its own site cited: in 83 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as IBM QRadar SOAR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM QRadar SOAR; a claim can dispute any of them.

IBM Security QRadar SOAR 6IBM Resilient 5IBM QRadar SOAR (formerly Resilient) 1IBM Resilient (IBM Security SOAR) 1IBM Security QRadar SOAR (SaaS Edition) 1IBM Security QRadar SOAR (formerly Resilient) 1

Follow IBM QRadar SOAR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

IBM is the company behind IBM QRadar SOAR.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from IBM: IBM AI Fairness 360, IBM API Connect, IBM Apptio Cloudability, IBM Aspera, IBM Aspera Managed File Transfer, IBM Business Automation Workflow, IBM Cloud Databases, IBM Cloud Kubernetes and 98 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: helps organizations automate and orchestrate incident response workflows. It also ensures that their specific processes are followed in a consistent, optimized and measurable way.
ibm.com/products/qradar
For: organizations
ibm.com/products/qradar
Certifications: Winner of a Red Dot User Interface Design AwardKuppingerCole SOAR Leadership CompassGanador de un premio Red Dot al diseño de la interfaz de usuario
Hosting: Local
Customers named: Doosan Digital Innovation (DDI)Silverfern ITAskari BankDoosan Digital Innovation
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What IBM QRadar SOAR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ibm.com/products/qradar, ibm.com/products/qradar-soar, developer.ibm.com/articles/awb-tracking-slas-security-incidents-using-qradar-soar, ibm.com/es-es/products/qradar-soar, ibm.com/id-id/products/qradar-soar. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM QRadar SOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM QRadar SOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM QRadar SOAR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where IBM QRadar SOAR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM QRadar SOAR, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.