IT AI Index
Index Vendors › IBM QRadar SOAR · September 2026 Edition
IBM · 1 category · Ranked

IBM QRadar SOAR

63Judge labels
2First choices
18Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in SOAR for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 49 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 20 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In soar · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named IBM QRadar SOAR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
SOAR platformsSecurity operations0%16 of 4925%20criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for IBM QRadar SOAR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated IBM QRadar SOAR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative24 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose IBM QRadar SOAR if compliance and standardized incident response are top priorities” Kimi K2 · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“A robust, enterprise-grade solution that tightly couples with IBM\u2019s QRadar SIEM.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong for larger enterprises with complex incident-response and compliance needs.” GPT-5.4 mini · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Highly regulated, risk-averse, or on-premises enterprise environments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“This is arguably the biggest "avoid" right now, primarily due to lifecycle/roadmap risk” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequent integration issues, API performance problems, app quality complaints” Kimi K2 · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for new deployments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Known vulnerabilities: Has had multiple security advisories ... Recommendation: Requires vigilant patching and security updates.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM QRadar SOAR, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM QRadar SOAR was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Splunk SOAR58 of 633Not in the top three
Cortex XSOAR56 of 6326Not in the top three
Tines37 of 6311Not in the top three
Microsoft Sentinel33 of 631Not in the top three
Torq26 of 634Not in the top three
Swimlane26 of 631Not in the top three
Google Security Operations SOAR20 of 631Not in the top three
FortiSOAR20 of 630Not in the top three
Swimlane Turbine13 of 632Not in the top three
D3 Security Smart SOAR13 of 631Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM QRadar SOAR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 63 answers that named IBM QRadar SOAR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com38
expertinsights.com32
strike48.com29
gartner.com28
aimultiple.com22
blinkops.com22
simbian.ai21
checkthat.ai18
guptadeepak.com15
exabeam.com14

239 of the 239 domain citations in answers naming IBM QRadar SOAR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as IBM QRadar SOAR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM QRadar SOAR; a claim can dispute any of them.
IBM Security QRadar SOAR 5IBM 1IBM QRadar SOAR (Resilient) 1IBM QRadar SOAR (formerly Resilient) 1IBM QRadar SOAR / IBM Security SOAR 1IBM Resilient 1IBM Security SOAR 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM QRadar SOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM QRadar SOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ibm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack