Every category where a model named Google Security Operations SOAR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SOAR platforms	Security operations	0%	20 of 49	29%	14	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Security Operations SOAR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Security Operations SOAR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Cloud-first SOCs on Google Cloud Platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strong Alternatives ... 1. Google Chronicle SOAR” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SOAR · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Google Cloud ecosystem integration” MiniMax M2.5 · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Google SecOps for Chronicle users” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SOAR · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High vendor lock-in. Bundled SOAR platforms naturally optimize for their parent vendor's ecosystem.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative

“Platforms to Approach Cautiously ... Best when bundled with existing Google Cloud infrastructure” Kimi K2 · SOAR · direct prompt · soft negative

“Other options to consider are Splunk and Chronical, although they may not be as budget-friendly.” Llama 4 Maverick · SOAR · budget prompt · soft negative

“Customer support quality concerns persist after the acquisition.” MiniMax M2.5 · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Security Operations SOAR, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Security Operations SOAR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cortex XSOAR32 of 3512Not in the top three

Splunk SOAR31 of 351Not in the top three

Tines24 of 356Not in the top three

Torq21 of 354Not in the top three

IBM QRadar SOAR20 of 351Not in the top three

FortiSOAR18 of 350Not in the top three

Microsoft Sentinel16 of 350Not in the top three

D3 Security Smart SOAR15 of 354Not in the top three

Swimlane13 of 350Not in the top three

Swimlane Turbine11 of 353Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Security Operations SOAR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 35 answers that named Google Security Operations SOAR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com20

blinkops.com18

expertinsights.com17

gartner.com17

strike48.com14

checkthat.ai12

guptadeepak.com11

aimultiple.com10

guideflow.com10

simbian.ai10

139 of the 139 domain citations in answers naming Google Security Operations SOAR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/soar-tools-comparison20

blinkops.com/blog/soar-platforms17

expertinsights.com/network-security/the-top-soar-solutions17

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-solutions17

strike48.com/post/top-soar-platforms14

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-soar-tools-available12

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-soar-platforms-202611

aimultiple.com/top-soar-platforms10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Security Operations SOAR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Security Operations SOAR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Google SecOps 4Google Chronicle SOAR 2Chronical 1Chronicle Security Operations/Siemplify 1Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle) SOAR 1Google SecOps / Chronicle 1Google Security Operations (SecOps) SOAR 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Security Operations SOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Security Operations SOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.