Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 41 → 47 of 62
Google Security Operations · 1 category · RankedGoogle Security Operations SOAR
47Judge labels
2First choices
18Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in SOAR for enterprise buyers
Rank 57 of 67 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 42% of its 19 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Google Security Operations SOAR →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business46 of 64
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market57 of 67
0%19 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise7 of 45
4%23 labels
criticized challenger
In soar · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Google Security Operations SOAR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 0% | 57 of 67 | 42% | 19 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Google Security Operations SOAR held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SOAR · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 18 of 56
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 7 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 57 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Google Security Operations SOAR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Google Security Operations SOAR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative16 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Microsoft Sentinel or Google Security Operations if you want SOAR tightly aligned to those cloud ecosystems.” GPT-5.4 mini · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Google SecOps or Microsoft Sentinel when you want SOAR bundled with your SIEM” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“No-code playbooks and unified case management on Google Cloud infrastructure” Perplexity Sonar · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Cloud-focused; integrates detection/response with Mandiant intel.” Grok 4.20 · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Google Siemplify | Absorbed into Google SecOps as its SOAR layer. The standalone product no longer exists to renew.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · negative prompt · hard negative
“has high vendor lock-in, which may limit its flexibility and compatibility with other security tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
“flagged for high vendor lock-in... may want to proceed with caution” Mistral Small · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
“with customer-support quality concerns persisting post-acquisition” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Google Security Operations SOAR, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Security Operations SOAR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Google Security Operations SOAR, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Security Operations SOAR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Security Operations SOAR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 46 answers that named Google Security Operations SOAR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
checkthat.ai28
intezer.com25
zendikt.com23
aimultiple.com22
startupstash.com19
paloaltonetworks.com18
strike48.com18
csoonline.com16
guideflow.com15
expertinsights.com14
198 of the 198 domain citations in answers naming Google Security Operations SOAR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
google.dev is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Google Security Operations SOAR takes 0% of first choices and Tines takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
google.dev is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Google Security Operations SOAR takes 0% of first choices and Tines takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “soar platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “soar platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“google security operations soar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- google.dev shared with Google Security Operations's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 881,346 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 22,650 · 2,977 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 29,239
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 57 of 67 in SOAR
Segment leader
41%
Tines
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 46 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 44 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Google Security Operations SOAR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Security Operations SOAR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google SecOps 3Google SecOps SOAR 3Google Security Operations 3Siemplify 2Google Chronicle SOAR 1Google SecOps (Siemplify) 1Google SecOps SOAR (formerly Siemplify/Chronicle SOAR) 1Google Security Operations SOAR (formerly Chronicle SOAR) 1
Follow Google Security Operations SOAR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Google Security Operations is the company behind Google Security Operations SOAR.ShowHide
The company
Google Security Operations is the company behind Google Security Operations SOAR.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Google Security Operations
- Google Security Operations agentic SOC
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Security Operations SOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Security Operations SOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Security Operations SOAR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Google Security Operations SOAR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Security Operations SOAR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.