Compliance automation
Asked as “compliance automation platform”, and as “SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
34%
Contested · Vanta 29%
34Drata29Vanta15Sprinto22others
34% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−2Since September 2026: 37% → 35%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Drata held the lead, −2 points on 37%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vanta35%Contested▲+1Since September 2026: 35% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Drata34%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 37% → 35%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseVanta37%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 48% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Vanta35%Contested▲+1Since September 2026: 35% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketDrata34%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 37% → 35%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseVanta37%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 48% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Drata34%16%63endorsed leader▼−2Since September 2026: 37% → 35%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.37% → 35%
Drata34%16%63endorsed leader▼−2Since September 2026: 37% → 35%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.37% → 35%02Vanta29%22%67accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.23% → 29%
Vanta29%22%67accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.23% → 29%03
Sprinto15%7%44accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 8% → 15%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 15%
Sprinto15%7%44accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 8% → 15%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 15%04
Secureframe7%8%53accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 8%
Secureframe7%8%53accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 8%05
Scrut Automation2%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Scrut Automation2%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%06
Scytale2%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Scytale2%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance0%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance0%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Hyperproof0%11%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Hyperproof0%11%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Thoropass0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Thoropass0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Drata34%
Drata34%02Vanta29%
Vanta29%03Sprinto15%
Sprinto15%04Secureframe7%
Secureframe7%05Scrut Automation2%
Scrut Automation2%06Scytale2%
Scytale2%07Hyperproof0%
Hyperproof0%08Thoropass0%
Thoropass0%09OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance0%
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Vanta22%
15 of 67 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid If Budget Is Tight ... **Vanta** (~$10K–$35K+/yr)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Drata16%
10 of 63 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid If Budget Is Tight ... **Drata** (~$7.5K–$15K+/yr)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance40%
6 of 15 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Why avoid (unless you are a massive enterprise): Startups and mid-market companies often find these platforms require weeks of manual configuration” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Secureframe8%
4 of 53 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“and **Secureframe** are powerful but generally priced for venture-backed startups” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1048 links across 227 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Vanta45 answers · 101 citations · 14 models
31 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ComplyJet28 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sprinto25 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Optro24 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 36 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cynomi20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Netwrix20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Scrut14 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Drata14 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drata drata.com | 34% | 390 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | 7 | |
| Vanta vanta.com | 29% | 500 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | 1 | |
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 15% | 234 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 | ||
| Secureframe secureframe.com | 7% | 232 | 2,400 | 39 | 45,014 | 27 | ||
| ComplyJet complyjet.com | 3% | 38 | 90 | 0 | 2,025 | |||
| LowerPlane lowerplane.com | 3% | 2 | 20 | 0 | 82 | |||
| Scrut Automation scrut.io | 2% | 63 | 390 | 10 | 10,568 | 34 | 9 | |
| Scytale scytale.ai | 2% | 36 | 12,100 | 225 | 7,411 | $23,659 | 14 | |
| ZenGRC zengrc.com | 2% | 62 | 480 | 4 | 29,603 | 9 | ||
| Comp AI trycomp.ai | 2% | 11 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cynomi.com, drata.com, netwrix.com, optro.ai, scrut.io, vanta.com). The first result for “best compliance automation platform” is vanta.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best compliance automation platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top compliance automation platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best compliance automation platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a compliance automation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which compliance automation platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DrataDrata, VantaChangedVantaSprintono first choiceagainst: ISMS.online, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, Secureframe, ThoropassThree alternatives
Hyperproof, Secureframe, SprintoFive alternatives
Cynomi, Drata, Scytale, Secureframe, ThoropassThree alternatives
Eramba, Scrut Automation, SimpleRiskGPT-5.4 miniVantaVantaHeldno first choiceSecureframe, Sprintoagainst: Drata, Vantano first choiceagainst: Scytale, Secfix
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, SecureframeTwo alternatives
Drata, SecureframeGemini 3.5 FlashDrata, VantaDrata, VantaHeldDrata, VantaSprintoagainst: Drata, Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer, Diligent, Drata, OneTrust Certification Automation, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta
Three alternatives
Secureframe, Sprinto, ThoropassTwo alternatives
Secureframe, ThoropassFour alternatives
Anecdotes, Scytale, Secureframe, SprintoSix alternatives
Comp AI, Eramba, Openlane, Screenata, Scrut Automation, ThoropassPerplexity SonarDrata, VantaVantaChangedDrata, VantaSprintoagainst: Drata, Vanta, ZenGRCno first choiceagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
Two alternatives
Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk CloudTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, SprintoSix alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, Sprinto, ThoropassOne alternative
Scrut AutomationGrok 4.1 FastDrataDrataHeldVantaagainst: OneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceComplyJetagainst: Hyperproof, Prowler, Vantano first choiceagainst: AuditBoard, BRIDGE, Drata, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Scrut Automation, Vanta, myosh
Two alternatives
Secureframe, VantaTwo alternatives
Sprinto, VantaSix alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Scrut Automation, Scytale, Secureframe, SprintoThree alternatives
Drata, Secureframe, SprintoMistral SmallVantaagainst: OrbiqScrut Automation, VantaChangedHyperproofZenGRCno first choiceagainst: Hyperproof
Five alternatives
Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Secureframe, Sprinto, ThoropassTwo alternatives
Cakewalk, SprintoThree alternatives
Drata, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, ScytaleOne alternative
SprintoDeepSeek V4 FlashDrataVantaChangedVantaagainst: Anecdotes, ScytaleSprintoagainst: VantaDrata, Secureframe, Vantaagainst: MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Drata, Vanta
Seven alternatives
HiComply, Hyperproof, ISMS.online, Orbiq, Secureframe, Sprinto, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, SecureframeFour alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Secureframe, SprintoThree alternatives
ComplyJet, Drata, SecureframeOne alternative
HyperproofLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceDrataChangedVantaSprintono first choicenothing named
One alternative
ConsilienTwo alternatives
Vanta, ZenGRCQwen 3.7 FlashVantaDrataChangedDrata, Vantaagainst: ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementScytaleagainst: VantaDrata, Vantaagainst: Archer, MetricStreamagainst: Archer, AuditBoard, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
Drata, Secureframe, SprintoTwo alternatives
Secureframe, VantaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, SecureframeTwo alternatives
ZenGRC, monday serviceThree alternatives
Hyperproof, Secureframe, SprintoKimi K2DrataDrataHeldDrata, VantaComp AIagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vantano first choiceagainst: OneTrust Certification Automation, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Thoropass
Two alternatives
Secureframe, VantaThree alternatives
Secureframe, Sprinto, VantaThree alternatives
LogicGate, Scytale, SecureframeTwo alternatives
Prowler, ScytaleGLM 4.7 FlashXDrata, SecureframeSprintoChangedagainst: ComplyJetDrata, Secureframe, VantaComplyJet, LowerPlaneagainst: AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, VantaDrata, Secureframe, Vantanothing named
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, Orbiq, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, VantaFive alternatives
AuditBoard, ComplyAdvantage, Lockstep, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, TrustArcFive alternatives
CookieYes, Probo, Prowler, Sprinto, TrustCloudMiniMax M2.5Drata, VantaDrataChangedVantaSprintono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Secureframe, SprintoThree alternatives
Secureframe, Sprinto, VantaSix alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Scytale, Secureframe, SprintoThree alternatives
Drata, Strike Graph, VantaGPT-6 LunaDrataVantaChangedno first choiceSprintono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Hyperproof, VantaOne alternative
DrataMuse Glimmer 30BVantaDrataChangedVantaLowerPlane, OneTrust Certification Automationagainst: Drata, Vantano first choiceagainst: Delve, Vanta
Four alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Secureframe, SprintoTwo alternatives
Secureframe, VantaFour alternatives
Drata, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Optro, formerly AuditBoard, SecureframeThree alternatives
Aneidot, ComplyJet, SprintoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:40 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:32 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 21 | 84 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:35 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 16 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:44 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 17 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 18 | 106 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:52 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:32 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:51 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 18 | 18 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 23 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:57 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:13 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 16 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:32 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 9 | 82 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 13 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 2 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 22 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 21 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:11 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:02 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
Noise floor in this category
Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.
ShowHide
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 of 4 flipped
GPT-5.4 mini
2 of 3 flipped
Gemini 3.5 Flash
3 of 4 flipped
Perplexity Sonar
2 of 4 flipped
Grok 4.1 Fast
3 of 5 flipped
Mistral Small
3 of 4 flipped
DeepSeek V4 Flash
3 of 5 flipped
Llama 4 Maverick
2 of 4 flipped
Qwen 3.7 Flash
2 of 5 flipped
Kimi K2
3 of 5 flipped
GLM 4.7 FlashX
4 of 5 flipped
MiniMax M2.5
2 of 4 flipped
GPT-6 Luna
3 of 4 flipped
Muse Glimmer 30B
2 of 4 flipped
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
OneTrust read as OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance
Scrut read as Scrut Automation
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
BRIDGE
ComplyAdvantage
CookieYes
LegalZoom
Lockstep
NAVEX One Compliance Essentials
OSS tools
Openlane
Screenata
Secfix
TrustArc
TryComp AI
Valiido
myosh
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.