Every category where a model named ManageEngine Log360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SIEM platforms	Security operations	4%	5 of 49	6%	16	accepted challenger
SOAR platforms	Security operations	2%	14 of 49	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by Tines at 47%
Log management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	18 of 59	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 20%
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	115 of 128	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ManageEngine Log360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ManageEngine Log360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	2	2	1	7
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	5	0	2	7
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels2

Paraphrase10 labels5

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained17 labels3

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Log360 combines SIEM, user behavior analytics, and security orchestration and is best for cost-conscious midsize enterprises.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

“ManageEngine Log360 as the best general-purpose mid-market SIEM when Microsoft dependency is not the deciding factor” Perplexity Sonar · SIEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“the strongest low-cost choice is usually ManageEngine Log360” Perplexity Sonar · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice

“ManageEngine Log360 is a budget-friendly option that is suitable for mid-market teams needing SIEM with DLP and CASB capabilities” Llama 4 Maverick · SIEM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Reviewers note UI feels dated and inconsistent across modules, plus performance slowdowns under high log volumes.” MiniMax M2.5 · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative

“Advanced detection capabilities are not as deep as Rapid7 or Sentinel; limited third-party integrations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SIEM · direct prompt · soft negative

“places these as Niche Players: limited vision/execution for broad log management, weaker in scalability” Grok 4.1 Fast · Logs · negative prompt · soft negative

“more of an integrated SIEM/UEBA platform than a pure threat intelligence platform” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine Log360, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine Log360 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Sentinel37 of 579Not in the top three

Blumira19 of 578Not in the top three

Wazuh17 of 578Not in the top three

Splunk16 of 570Not in the top three

Rapid7 InsightIDR13 of 577Not in the top three

Elastic Security12 of 570Not in the top three

Splunk Enterprise Security11 of 571Not in the top three

Graylog11 of 570Not in the top three

Tines10 of 574Not in the top three

IBM QRadar10 of 570Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine Log360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 57 answers that named ManageEngine Log360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com30

manageengine.comYour site25

reddit.com25

comparitech.com23

underdefense.com23

expertinsights.com21

gartner.com18

aimultiple.com13

capterra.com12

exabeam.com12

177 of the 202 domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine Log360 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/siem-tools-comparison19

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison17

manageengine.com/log-management/top-siem-tools.html13

reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1b80zza/best_siem_solution_for_small_company13

blogs.fluencysecurity.com/siem-for-smbs11

comparitech.com/net-admin/best-soar-software11

costbench.com/best/siem-for-small-business11

cyberinfos.in/top-10-best-siem-tools-202611

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ManageEngine Log360

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ManageEngine Log360; a claim can dispute any of them.

Log360 2Log360 (ManageEngine) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine Log360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine Log360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.