| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEM platforms | Security operations | 4% | 5 of 61 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 2% | 10 of 67 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Tines at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 51 of 73 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Threat intelligence platforms | Security operations | 0% | 31 of 119 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by MISP at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 50 of 58 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 40% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEM | 4% | 5% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 of 61, unchanged |
| SOAR | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 10 of 67 |
| Logs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 51 of 73 |
| Threat intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 99 → 31 of 119 |
| XDR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 58, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best SIEM platform for a company with a limited budget is ManageEngine Log360, as it is budget-friendly” Llama 4 Maverick · SIEM · budget prompt · first choice
“ManageEngine Log360 and Tines offer the most affordable paid options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice
“I would recommend ManageEngine Log360 as the default SIEM choice” Perplexity Sonar · SIEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Low paid budget: ManageEngine Log360's $840/yr Professional Plan is one of the few commercial SOAR-adjacent products with a published sub-$1k annual price.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Support lifecycle pages such as ManageEngine Log360 also make clear that after a version reaches End of Support it will no longer receive technical support or security updates” Muse Glimmer 30B · Logs · negative prompt · soft negative
“SOAR limited to Enterprise edition (surprise costs), dated/inconsistent UI, and performance dips” Grok 4.20 · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reviews frequently point out specific bottlenecks for growing organizations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 98 of the 98 answers that named ManageEngine Log360 and are not a share of its labels.
288 of the 314 domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine Log360 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ManageEngine Log360's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: manageengine.com/log-management/log360-videos.html, manageengine.com/log-management/log360-siem-license.html, manageengine.com/log-management/log360-architecture.html, manageengine.com/log-management/log360-crash-course.html, manageengine.com/log-management/log360-addon-download.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine Log360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine Log360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ManageEngine Log360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: