Every category where a model named FortiSOAR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SOAR platforms	Security operations	2%	7 of 49	6%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FortiSOAR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FortiSOAR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. FortiSOAR ... Fortinet is specifically designed for enterprise, mid-size, and small businesses, making it well-suited to your scale.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SOAR · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If your stack is heavily Fortinet‑centric and you want seamless fabric integration: Choose FortiSOAR.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SOAR · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose FortiSOAR if your infrastructure is heavily reliant on Fortinet hardware/software.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Suitable for Fortinet users and teams seeking broad automation at lower complexity” Llama 4 Maverick · SOAR · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High vendor lock-in. Bundled SOAR platforms naturally optimize for their parent vendor's ecosystem.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FortiSOAR, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FortiSOAR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Splunk SOAR36 of 402Not in the top three

Cortex XSOAR31 of 4017Not in the top three

Tines31 of 4012Not in the top three

Torq20 of 404Not in the top three

IBM QRadar SOAR20 of 400Not in the top three

Google Security Operations SOAR18 of 401Not in the top three

Microsoft Sentinel17 of 401Not in the top three

Swimlane16 of 400Not in the top three

Rapid7 InsightConnect12 of 403Not in the top three

D3 Security Smart SOAR11 of 402Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FortiSOAR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 40 answers that named FortiSOAR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com28

gartner.com23

blinkops.com19

expertinsights.com19

simbian.ai15

strike48.com15

aimultiple.com12

checkthat.ai12

eastbaycyber.com12

guptadeepak.com11

166 of the 166 domain citations in answers naming FortiSOAR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/soar-tools-comparison28

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-solutions23

blinkops.com/blog/soar-platforms19

expertinsights.com/network-security/the-top-soar-solutions19

simbian.ai/blog/top-5-soar-platforms-202615

strike48.com/post/top-soar-platforms13

aimultiple.com/top-soar-platforms12

eastbaycyber.com/content/compare-best-soar-platforms-compared-202612

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as FortiSOAR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FortiSOAR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fortinet FortiSOAR 7

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FortiSOAR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FortiSOAR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fortinet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.