IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Shuffle · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Shuffle

37Judge labels
7First choices
4Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in SOAR for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 49 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In soar · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Shuffle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
SOAR platformsSecurity operations11%3 of 490%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Shuffle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Shuffle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels7
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“starting with an open-source platform like Cortex XSOAR Community Edition or Shuffle can be an excellent way” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice
“Shuffle (Best Overall for Budget-Conscious Teams)... start with Shuffle if you can self-host” Grok 4.1 Fast · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice
“Tracecat and Shuffle are the top open-source SOAR platforms for small budgets” Mistral Small · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Shuffle (Free / Open Source)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SOAR · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Shuffle, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Shuffle was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Splunk SOAR26 of 372Not in the top three
Cortex XSOAR20 of 370Not in the top three
Torq18 of 373Not in the top three
Microsoft Sentinel9 of 370Not in the top three
n8n9 of 370Not in the top three
StackStorm8 of 370Not in the top three
Swimlane8 of 370Not in the top three
Tracecat7 of 371Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Shuffle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 37 answers that named Shuffle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com20
paloaltonetworks.com20
blinkops.com18
soarpricing.com17
comparitech.com15
gartner.com15
tech-insider.org11
tines.com11
automationatlas.io10
reddit.com10

147 of the 147 domain citations in answers naming Shuffle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Shuffle

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Shuffle; a claim can dispute any of them.
Shuffler 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Shuffle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Shuffle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at shuffler.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.