AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Security operations › Client-side protection › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Client-side protection for enterprise buyers

Asked as “client-side protection tool”, and as “tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
17%
Contested · Reflectiz 10%
17cside10Reflectiz08Feroot PaymentGuard65others

17% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01cside17%4%26accepted challenger
02Reflectiz10%26%27criticized challenger
03Microsoft Defender for Endpoint8%0%10accepted challenger
04Feroot PaymentGuard8%20%15accepted challenger
05Source Defense8%25%24criticized challenger
06Imperva Client-Side Protection6%15%26accepted challenger
07Feroot Security6%0%15accepted challenger
08Cloudflare Page Shield6%14%14accepted challenger
09Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%25%28criticized challenger
10HUMAN Security2%36%14criticized challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01cside17%
02Reflectiz10%
03Microsoft Defender for Endpoint8%
04Feroot PaymentGuard8%
05Source Defense8%
06Imperva Client-Side Protection6%
07Feroot Security6%
08Cloudflare Page Shield6%
09Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%
10HUMAN Security2%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Reflectiz
26%
7 of 27 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“such as JavaScript sandboxing agents (e.g., from vendors like JScrambler, SourceDefense/Reflectiz, Human Security)” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
25%
7 of 28 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Tools/Approaches to **Avoid Entirely or as Standalone Solutions**: - **Purely Browser-Based JavaScript Agents/Sandboxing** (e.g., client-side EDR-like tools or script obfuscators)” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Source Defense
25%
6 of 24 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“such as JavaScript sandboxing agents (e.g., from vendors like JScrambler, SourceDefense/Reflectiz, Human Security)” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
HUMAN Security
36%
5 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“enterprises are advised to avoid treating pure client-side JavaScript agents... vendors that position themselves solely as browser-side Magecart monitors such as Human Security” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1145 links across 299 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · cside58 answers · 140 citations · 13 models
vendor site · FitGap40 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G231 answers · 47 citations · 9 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Akamai25 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SourceForge23 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Imperva21 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Reflectiz19 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Feroot18 answers · 49 citations · 11 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
cside cside.com17%851,90003,51924
Feroot Security feroot.com
Feroot PaymentGuard 8%, Feroot Security 6%
13%467014,806$627
Reflectiz reflectiz.com10%8432001,81126
Microsoft Defender parent site
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint 8%, Microsoft Defender XDR 2%
10%26818,1003,525
Source Defense sourcedefense.com8%69170167132
Imperva imperva.com
Imperva Client-Side Protection 6%
6%643,600184417,309 company1
Cloudflare parent site
Cloudflare Page Shield 6%
6%41550,00010,897
Akamai parent site
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance 6%, Akamai Client-Side Protection 0%, Akamai Page Integrity Manager 0%
6%1527,1001,614
CrowdStrike parent site
CrowdStrike Falcon 4%
4%23474,0005,130
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity jscrambler.com4%8403,194426

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akamai.com, cside.com, g2.com, imperva.com, startupstash.com). The first result for “best client-side protection tool” is imperva.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best client-side protection tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade client-side protection tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best client-side protection tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a client-side protection tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which client-side protection tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceFeroot PaymentGuardChanged
Three alternativesAperia Compliance Script Monitor, Cloudflare Page Shield, Vault JS
no first choicecsideno first choiceagainst: Reflectiz
GPT-5.4 miniOWASP Penetration Testing Kit
Three alternativesCoraza, ModSecurity, OWASP CRS
Feroot PaymentGuard, Source DefenseChanged
One alternativecside
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Two alternativesAkamai App & API Protector, Imperva Application Security Platform
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
One alternativeCrowdStrike Falcon
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashHUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz
Two alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, cside
ReflectizChanged
Three alternativesFeroot Security, HUMAN Client-Side Defense, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
against: Akamai, Cloudflare
Reflectiz
Six alternativesAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Client-Side Security, Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense
Reflectiz
Five alternativesAkamai Workforce Protector, Cloudflare Page Shield, Island, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Talon
no first choicenothing named
Perplexity SonarAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Three alternativesFeroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection, cside
csideChanged
Two alternativesFeroot PaymentGuard, Reflectiz
Imperva Client-Side Protection
Seven alternativesAkamai Client-Side Protection, F5 Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense, Feroot PaymentGuard, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, cside
no first choice
Two alternativesImperva Client-Side Protection, Radware Client-Side Protection
no first choiceagainst: DomDog, Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, cside
Grok 4.1 FastImperva Client-Side Protection
Two alternativesFeroot Security, HUMAN Security
Feroot SecurityChanged
Four alternativesAkamai Page Integrity Manager, Reflectiz, Source Defense, cside
Imperva Client-Side Protection
Five alternativesFeroot Security, HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, cside
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Two alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity
against: Bitdefender, Sophos Intercept X
no first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Mistral SmallImperva Client-Side ProtectionDatadog Real User Monitoring, Fixel, SentryChanged
Three alternativesFathom Analytics, LogRocket, Plausible Analytics
DomDog, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Three alternativesAkamai Page Integrity Manager, CHEQ AI Technologies, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Cisco’s client-side protection toolno first choiceagainst: Content Security Policy, HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
DeepSeek V4 FlashAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Source Defense
Four alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Feroot SecurityChanged
Three alternativesJscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense, cside
Reflectiz
Seven alternativesAkamai, Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense, c/side
cside
One alternativeSource Defense
against: Akamai, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
no first choiceagainst: Akamai, Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, PerimeterX/HUMAN, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Llama 4 MaverickImperva Client-Side Protection
One alternativeBeagle Security
Reflectiz, csideChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashCrowdStrike
Three alternativesMicrosoft, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
DynatraceChanged
Three alternativesDatadog, New Relic, Sentry
CrowdStrike Falcon
Four alternativesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, VMware Carbon Black
CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender XDR
Two alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
against: Akamai, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Radware
no first choicenothing named
Kimi K2Feroot PaymentGuard, cside
Four alternativesAkamai Page Integrity Manager, Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Feroot SecurityChanged
Two alternativesHUMAN Security, Source Defense
against: Cloudflare Page Shield
no first choiceCloudflare Page Shield
Four alternativesFeroot Security, HUMAN Client-Side Defense, Source Defense, cside
no first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
GLM 4.7 FlashXCloudflare Page Shield
Four alternativesFeroot Security, HUMAN Client-Side Supply Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
csideChanged
Two alternativesFastly Client-Side Protection, Feroot PaymentGuard
Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Four alternativesHUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
against: Cloudflare, Detectify
Cloudflare Page Shield
Two alternativesAkamai Client-Side Protection, cside
no first choiceagainst: Feroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection
MiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon
Four alternativesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X, Trellix
Feroot PaymentGuard, csideChanged
Two alternativesFastly Client-Side Protection, PCI Oasis
CrowdStrike Falcon
Six alternativesBitdefender GravityZone, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X, Trend Vision One
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Two alternativesCrowdStrike, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaJscrambler Webpage Integrity
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Reflectiz
Reflectiz’s PCI ModuleChanged
One alternativeFeroot PaymentGuard
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense Protect
Four alternativesAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Client-Side Security, Reflectiz, c/side
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Two alternativesCrowdStrike, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BSource Defense, cside
Two alternativesAkamai Client-Side Protection, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Reflectiz, Source DefenseChanged
One alternativeFeroot PaymentGuard
CrowdStrike Falcon, Island Enterprise Browser
Four alternativesMenlo Security Secure Enterprise Browser / Remote Browser Isolation, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Parallels Browser Isolation, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
csideno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:32no07 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:55yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:34yes1636 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:55yes363 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:03yes2412 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:50yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:11yes2036 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:12yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:39no024 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:52yes2125 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:53yes2148 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:17yes520 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:54yes427 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:52yes2125 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:56yes1513 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:21yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:06yes1825 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:15yes204 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:39yes2111 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:02no02 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:32yes2357 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:05yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:41no032 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:32yes2527 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:31yes2351 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:12yes934 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:28yes312 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:33yes2030 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:30yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:29yes55 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:39yes2730 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:01yes174 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:25yes2214 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:03yes1812 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:28yes2239 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:12yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:32no031 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:23yes2127 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:02yes2340 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:33yes2358 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:54yes723 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:33yes2541 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:15yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:52yes23 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:35yes1834 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:56yes172 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:04yes2210 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:21yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:43yes1826 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:40yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:45yes993 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:43yes2424 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:02yes1943 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:12yes2051 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:08yes218 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:01yes1222 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:55yes189 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:33yes312 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:26yes626 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:09yes184 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:35yes2511 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:01no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:30yes16148 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:28yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:42no027 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:04yes2048 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:46yes2131 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:04no013 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:48yes230 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:42yes2536 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:33yes3715 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:38no06 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:17yes1929 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:24yes173 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:19yes2313 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:46yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:39yes2139 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:17yes104 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:28yes544 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:51yes2323 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:32yes2378 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:10yes852 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:48yes514 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:56yes1742 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Fastly read as Fastly Client-Side Protection
Feroot read as Feroot PaymentGuard
Feroot (PaymentGuard) read as Feroot PaymentGuard
HUMAN read as HUMAN Security
HUMAN (formerly PerimeterX) read as HUMAN Security
Imperva read as Imperva Client-Side Protection
JScrambler read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Jscrambler read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
SentinelOne (Client-Side Protection) read as SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
SentinelOne (Singularity) read as SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Sophos read as Sophos Intercept X
Unresolved, counted raw
Akamai Prolexic Routed
Aperia Compliance Script Monitor
CHEQ AI Technologies
Cisco’s client-side protection tool (cside)
Cloudflare Zaraz
Datadog Real User Monitoring (RUM)
Fixel
GoTrust DLP
HUMAN Client-Side Supply Security
Jsmon Inc.
Menlo Security Secure Enterprise Browser / Remote Browser Isolation
OWASP CRS
OWASP Penetration Testing Kit
Parallels Browser Isolation
Radware CSP
Reflectiz’s PCI Module
Source Defense Protect
Vault JS (Enterprise Global)
Zero Trust Client
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Business continuityComms archiving →