Client-side protection · October 2026 Edition
cside vs Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
One of fourteen models named cside first on the direct prompt; two named Jscrambler Webpage Integrity. cside was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity by twelve and cside carries 26 labels and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share13%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%37%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels2630A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, cside reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.cside vs Reflectiz · cside vs Source Defense · cside vs Feroot PaymentGuard
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client-side protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
csideFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJscrambler Webpage Integrity
Direct121 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Paraphrase202 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Comparative30
Budget-constrained312 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Scale-constrained00
Negative006 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, cside and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity were named in the same answer thirty-seven times, of the 85 answers naming cside and the 85 naming Jscrambler Webpage Integrity. In those answers Jscrambler Webpage Integrity took the first choice two times and cside fifteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where cside and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
cside Jscrambler Webpage Integrity first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, cside on the left and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where cside and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity stood in it.
cside first, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity not the choice
1 of 14 modelsJscrambler Webpage Integrity was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashReflectiz, cside alternatives: Cloudflare's Client-Side Security
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity first, cside not the choice
2 of 14 modelscside was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
GLM 4.7 FlashXJscrambler Webpage Integrity alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance alternatives: Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, cside
Grok 4.1 FastImperva Client-Side Protection alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense
Qwen 3.7 FlashCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniF5 Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense alternatives: Feroot Security Inspector, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Client-Side Security alternatives: Reflectiz, Report URI, c/side
Llama 4 MaverickAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Client-Side Protection and Compliance Platform
Kimi K2Source Defense, c/side alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security
MiniMax M2.5Bitdefender GravityZone alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
GPT-6 LunaSophos MDR Complete alternatives: Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Muse Glimmer 30BBitdefender GravityZone Business Security alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
cside leads by twelve points.
cside14%#1 of 9Jscrambler Webpage Integrity2%#7 of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
cside leads by seven points.
cside13%#1 of 8Jscrambler Webpage Integrity7%#3 of 8Enterprise
cside leads by thirteen points.
cside17%#1 of 10Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%#9 of 10What the models said about cside
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“cside is cited in current round-ups as a platform that does server-side payload analysis + client-side Script Method and Scan Method with 100% real-user session coverage.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“cside (Highly ranked in comparisons): Server-side payload analysis + client-side runtime monitoring of 100% real sessions.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best fit is usually cside, because it has a public starting price of $99/month and also offers a free tier” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools that scramble your JavaScript code (like JSObfuscator or Jscrambler)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Vendors to Review Carefully: ... solutions from vendors like JScrambler, Reflectiz, Source Defense, and Human Security ... often fail to block the majority of sophisticated e-skimming attacks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies handling payment data, Jscrambler offers the best balance of protection, compliance support, and mid-market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“the best client-side protection tool for a company with a limited budget is Jscrambler” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Jscrambler is also recommended for SMBs and mid-market companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
cside vs Reflectizcside vs Source Defensecside vs Feroot PaymentGuardcside vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionReflectiz vs Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityJscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Source DefenseJscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Feroot PaymentGuardJscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full client-side protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.