Every category where a model named Feroot PaymentGuard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Client-side protection	Security operations	4%	9 of 120	20%	20	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Feroot PaymentGuard yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Feroot PaymentGuard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	2	0	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase18 labels5

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Use client-side protection tools that provide active blocking and real-time monitoring (e.g., Feroot, Human Security)” Mistral Small · Client-side protection · negative prompt · first choice

“If you want a single practical pick, Feroot PaymentGuard is a strong fit because it is described as low-overhead” Perplexity Sonar · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I recommend Reflectiz or Feroot as your primary tools” Mistral Small · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Five purpose-built tools are compared here: cside (from $99/mo, public pricing), Feroot, Cloudflare Client-Side Security, Reflectiz, and DomDog.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid: Enterprise solutions like Akamai, Imperva, or Feroot” Kimi K2 · Client-side protection · budget prompt · hard negative

“A caveat: its synthetic crawler can be bypassed by attackers who serve clean scripts to bots and malicious ones to real users.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · direct prompt · soft negative

“No public price → harder to budget” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Client-side protection · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Feroot PaymentGuard, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Feroot PaymentGuard was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

cside31 of 4611Compare →

Reflectiz30 of 465Compare →

Jscrambler Webpage Integrity23 of 460Compare →

Source Defense20 of 463Compare →

Imperva Client-Side Protection19 of 461Compare →

Cloudflare Page Shield15 of 460Not among the top eight

DomDog10 of 460Not among the top eight

Akamai8 of 460Not among the top eight

HUMAN Security8 of 460Not among the top eight

c/side6 of 464Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Feroot PaymentGuard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 46 answers that named Feroot PaymentGuard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cside.com45

sourceforge.net29

g2.com28

reflectiz.com22

us.fitgap.com20

feroot.comYour site17

geeksframework.com17

f6s.com15

paylinedata.com14

startupstash.com14

204 of the 221 domain citations in answers naming Feroot PaymentGuard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cside.com/blog/top-client-side-security-tools-full-guide30

g2.com/categories/client-side-protection19

cside.com/blog/solution-comparison-pci-dss-6-4-3-and-11-6-118

reflectiz.com/blog/pci-dss-6-4-3-11-6-1-solution-comparison18

geeksframework.com/software/client-side-protection-solutions17

paylinedata.com/blog/best-pci-dss-audit-management-software-ecommerce14

startupstash.com/top-client-side-protection-tools14

cside.com/blog/client-side-security-ecommerce-fintech-platforms12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

feroot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Feroot PaymentGuard takes 4% of first choices and cside takes 13%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “client-side protection tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “client-side protection tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“feroot paymentguard”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 4,806 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,624 · 36 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,625
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 18 clicks and $62 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

15 ads · 15 text · 7 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Feroot Security Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 13 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 120 in client-side protection

Segment leader

13%

cside

First choices: 8 across its categories
Named in: 46 answers
Its own site cited: in 46 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on feroot.com

688

subdomains included

Content

541

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	310	2	2026-09-23	GRC
Glossary or explainer	132	0	2025-11-25	SIEM, Compliance automation
News or press	51	2	2026-09-23
Comparison	20	0	2026-06-25
Conference or event	13	0	2026-04-16	GRC
Template or tool	8	0	2026-04-28
Webinar or virtual event	4	undated
Report or ebook	3	undated

Most recent

2026-09-23Feroot expands dxcomply with code free consent auditing for native mobile apps news or press
2026-09-23The consent compliance paradox blog
2026-08-21Beyond the compliance snapshot why grc needs continuous evidence blog
2026-07-31Ivan tsarynny on cnbc ai regulation should empower defenders not limit their ability to defend news or press
2026-06-25Cookie consent vs gdpr compliance why network traffic matters more than banners comparison
2026-06-18What canadas bill c 36 means for ai powered digital experiences blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page feroot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Feroot PaymentGuard

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Feroot PaymentGuard; a claim can dispute any of them.

Feroot 14

Follow Feroot PaymentGuard

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Feroot PaymentGuard is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Automates PCI DSS 4.0.1 compliance for payment pages. Blocks Magecart, e-skimming, and formjacking with audit-ready evidence.
feroot.com
For: payment pages
feroot.com
Price stated: Contact Feroot for a custom quote tailored to your specific needs. feroot.com/plans
Free plan or trial: free PageScanner tool feroot.com/plans
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II CompliantSOC 2PCI DSS - SAQ D; SPPCI DSS 4.0.1Req. 6.4.3 & 11.6.1SAQ A-EPSAQ D For Payment ProcessorsSAQ D For Merchants
Customers named: Gusto
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Feroot PaymentGuard's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: feroot.com, feroot.com/plans, trust.feroot.com, feroot.com/platform-overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Feroot PaymentGuard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Feroot PaymentGuard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Feroot PaymentGuard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Feroot PaymentGuard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Feroot PaymentGuard, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.