Index › Security operations › Client-side protection › Jscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Feroot PaymentGuard
Client-side protection · October 2026 Edition
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Feroot PaymentGuard
Two of fourteen models named Jscrambler Webpage Integrity first on the direct prompt; zero named Feroot PaymentGuard. Jscrambler Webpage Integrity was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Feroot PaymentGuard by nine and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity carries 30 labels and Feroot PaymentGuard 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate37%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels3020A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.cside vs Jscrambler Webpage Integrity · cside vs Feroot PaymentGuard · Reflectiz vs Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client-side protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFeroot PaymentGuard
Direct201 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity · 1 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Paraphrase022 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Comparative00
Budget-constrained102 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity · 3 against Feroot PaymentGuard
Scale-constrained00
Negative016 against Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity and Feroot PaymentGuard were named in the same answer twenty-three times, of the 85 answers naming Jscrambler Webpage Integrity and the 46 naming Feroot PaymentGuard. In those answers Feroot PaymentGuard took the first choice three times and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity zero.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Jscrambler Webpage Integrity and Feroot PaymentGuard stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity Feroot PaymentGuard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity on the left and Feroot PaymentGuard on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Jscrambler Webpage Integrity and Feroot PaymentGuard stood in it.
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity first, Feroot PaymentGuard not the choice
2 of 14 modelsFeroot PaymentGuard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
GLM 4.7 FlashXJscrambler Webpage Integrity alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance alternatives: Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, cside
Grok 4.1 FastImperva Client-Side Protection alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense
Qwen 3.7 FlashCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniF5 Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense alternatives: Feroot Security Inspector, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Client-Side Security alternatives: Reflectiz, Report URI, c/side
DeepSeek V4 FlashReflectiz, cside alternatives: Cloudflare's Client-Side Security
Llama 4 MaverickAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Client-Side Protection and Compliance Platform
Kimi K2Source Defense, c/side alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security
MiniMax M2.5Bitdefender GravityZone alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
GPT-6 LunaSophos MDR Complete alternatives: Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Muse Glimmer 30BBitdefender GravityZone Business Security alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Feroot PaymentGuard leads by two points.
Feroot PaymentGuard4%#4 of 9Jscrambler Webpage Integrity2%#7 of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Jscrambler Webpage Integrity leads at mid-market.
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity7%#3 of 8Feroot PaymentGuard4%#5 of 8Enterprise
The order flips: Feroot PaymentGuard leads at enterprise.
Feroot PaymentGuard8%#4 of 10Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%#9 of 10What the models said about Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools that scramble your JavaScript code (like JSObfuscator or Jscrambler)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Vendors to Review Carefully: ... solutions from vendors like JScrambler, Reflectiz, Source Defense, and Human Security ... often fail to block the majority of sophisticated e-skimming attacks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies handling payment data, Jscrambler offers the best balance of protection, compliance support, and mid-market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“the best client-side protection tool for a company with a limited budget is Jscrambler” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Jscrambler is also recommended for SMBs and mid-market companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Feroot PaymentGuard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise solutions like Akamai, Imperva, or Feroot” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“A caveat: its synthetic crawler can be bypassed by attackers who serve clean scripts to bots and malicious ones to real users.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Use client-side protection tools that provide active blocking and real-time monitoring (e.g., Feroot, Human Security)” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“If you want a single practical pick, Feroot PaymentGuard is a strong fit because it is described as low-overhead” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Reflectiz or Feroot as your primary tools” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
cside vs Jscrambler Webpage Integritycside vs Feroot PaymentGuardReflectiz vs Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityReflectiz vs Feroot PaymentGuardJscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Source DefenseJscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionSource Defense vs Feroot PaymentGuardFeroot PaymentGuard vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full client-side protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.