Business continuity management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “business continuity management platform”, and as “business continuity planning software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · ServiceNow Business Continuity Management 14%
27Fusion Risk Management14ServiceNow Business Continuity Management10ServiceNow BCM49others
27% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
LogicManager vs PreparisLogicManager vs Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceLogicManager vs Continuity2SafetyCulture vs ParaSolutionSafetyCulture vs QuantivateSafetyCulture vs PreparisSafetyCulture vs Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceSafetyCulture vs Continuity2ParaSolution vs QuantivateParaSolution vs PreparisParaSolution vs Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceParaSolution vs Continuity2Quantivate vs PreparisQuantivate vs Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceQuantivate vs Continuity2Preparis vs Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResiliencePreparis vs Continuity2Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs Continuity2
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
F01
02
03
04A05
06
07O08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Fusion Risk Management27%
02ServiceNow Business Continuity Management14%
ServiceNow Business Continuity Management14%03ServiceNow BCM10%
ServiceNow BCM10%04Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience8%
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience8%05Archer Business Resiliency3%
06Archer2%
Archer2%07Everbridge 3600%
Everbridge 3600%08Oracle Risk Management Cloud0%
09MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Fusion Risk Management
28%
15 of 53 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Why Avoid "Salesforce-Native" Platforms (like Fusion Risk Management) for this specific requirement?” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
MetricStream Business Continuity Management43%
10 of 23 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid **Archer** and legacy GRC suites (MetricStream, broader Riskonnect) unless you're locked into their ecosystems.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Archer64%
9 of 14 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“A large enterprise should generally **avoid** investing in a pure-play BCM suite that demands deep customization (like **RSA Archer** or **MetricStream**)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Everbridge 36030%
8 of 27 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“a separate tool for emergency mass notification (e.g., Everbridge, xMatters)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1151 links across 223 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
47 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Sprinto43 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Fortiv40 answers · 61 citations · 12 models
vendor site · SureCloud39 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
37 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mitratech34 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
32 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G230 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FitGap29 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow29 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 46 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 12 models
42 answers · 12 models
39 answers · 11 models
37 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 10 models
31 answers · 12 models
30 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Risk Management | 27% | 880 | 38 | |||
| ServiceNow parent site ServiceNow Business Continuity Management 14%, ServiceNow BCM 10%, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management 2% | 25% | 190 | 135,000 | 13,451 | ||
| Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience riskonnect.com | 8% | 89 | 0 | 55,995 | 41 | |
| Fusion Framework System | 5% | 50 | 0 | |||
| Archer Business Resiliency | 3% | 10 | 0 | |||
| Everbridge 360 AI Prepare everbridge.com | 2% | 8 | 62,347 | 16 | ||
| Fortiv fortiv.io | 2% | 8 | ||||
| eBRP Suite ebrp.net | 2% | 2 | ||||
| Archer Resilience Management | 2% | |||||
| Bloom | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com). The first result for “best business continuity management platform” is myhospitalnow.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business continuity management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which business continuity planning software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade business continuity management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business continuity management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a business continuity management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business continuity management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceFusion Risk Management, Mitratech Continuity PlanningChangedRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceServiceNow BCMno first choiceagainst: Archer, Fusion Framework, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, SAI360, ServiceNow BCM
Four alternatives
Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream BCM, ParaSolution, ServiceNow BCMThree alternatives
Archer Business Resilience, Everbridge 360, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementFour alternatives
Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, ServiceNow BCMThree alternatives
Continuity2, Everbridge 360, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceGPT-5.4 miniRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceAsigra, DrataChangedFusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, Fusion Risk ManagementEverbridge Prepare / BC in the Cloudno first choiceagainst: IBM OpenPages, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Oracle Risk Management Cloud
Three alternatives
Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, LogicManager, MetricStream Business Continuity ManagementNine alternatives
Abriska 22301, BCMLogic Next GRC Platform, Everbridge 360, Everbridge 360 AI Prepare, GlobalSuite, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360One alternative
Fusion Risk ManagementGemini 3.5 FlashFusion Framework SystemFusion Risk Management, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementChangedFusion Risk ManagementOnspringagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementFusion Framework Systemagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Druva, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, KingsBridge SHIELD, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Preparis, Rubrik, ServiceNow BCM, SharePoint, xMatters
Three alternatives
ParaSolution, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementTwo alternatives
ParaSolution, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceFour alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360 Business Continuity Management, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementThree alternatives
Continuity2, Veoci, eBRP SuiteThree alternatives
ParaSolution, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, VeociPerplexity SonarServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementHeldno first choiceagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementServiceNow BCMno first choiceagainst: CLDigital 360, Drata, Meridian BCMS, Ncontracts, ParaSolution, Quantivate BCM, ServiceNow BCM, Vanta, alive-IT
Three alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceTwo alternatives
Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceTwo alternatives
Oracle Risk Management Cloud, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceGrok 4.1 FastFusion Risk Managementagainst: ParaSolutionsServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementChangedagainst: BC in the Cloud, SafetyCultureFusion Risk Managementagainst: Everbridge 360, LogicGate, MetricStream Business Continuity ManagementFusion Risk Managementagainst: SafetyCultureFusion Risk Managementagainst: Archer Resilience Management, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream BCM, Ncontracts, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Four alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, LogicManager, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMFour alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Everbridge 360, Fusion Framework, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceThree alternatives
Archer, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementFour alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Resolver, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMFour alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Everbridge 360, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMMistral SmallServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceChangedFusion Risk ManagementServiceNow BCMagainst: Fusion Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, Fusion Risk Management, Ncontracts, ServiceNow BCM, Vanta
Three alternatives
Archer Resilience Management, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceThree alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, BC in the Cloud, Fusion Risk ManagementSix alternatives
Castellan, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream BCM, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, Resolver, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementTwo alternatives
Everbridge 360 AI Prepare, SmartSuiteDeepSeek V4 FlashFusion Risk Management, SAI360against: Archer, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceFusion Risk ManagementChangedno first choiceFortivagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilienceno first choiceagainst: Archer, Asana, ClickUp, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, Jira, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SharePoint
Two alternatives
Noggin, ParaSolutionTwo alternatives
Everbridge 360, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceOne alternative
ServiceNow BCMLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFusion Risk ManagementChangedno first choiceagainst: HyperproofArcher Business Resiliency, Fusion Risk Management, ServiceNow BCMno first choiceagainst: Drata, Fusion Risk Management, Vanta
Three alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, BC in the Cloud, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceQwen 3.7 FlashServiceNow BCMDiligent Risk ManagementChangedLogicManagerEverbridge 360 AI Prepareagainst: BCMMetrics, LogicManager, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceBloom, Relay, Zeliosagainst: Everbridge 360, ReddyBoxagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Ncontracts, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Five alternatives
Diligent BCM, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, ProcessUnity, Resilinc, SAP GRCTwo alternatives
Fusion Risk Management, MitratechSix alternatives
Diligent One, Mitratech, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, Resilinc, ServiceNow Business Continuity Management, SureCloud Operational ResilienceTwo alternatives
Corporater, ServiceNow BCMKimi K2Archer Business Resiliency, Fusion Framework SystemFusion Risk ManagementChangedFusion Risk ManagementServiceNow Business Continuity Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, Fusion Risk Management, GlobalSuite Solutions, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Vanta
One alternative
Everbridge 360Three alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMSix alternatives
Everbridge 360, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, RSA Archer Business Resiliency, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMTwo alternatives
Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceGLM 4.7 FlashXFusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementChangedLogicManagerSafetyCulture, ServiceNow BCMagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilienceno first choiceagainst: Asigra, Everbridge 360, Quantivate Business Continuity Management
Five alternatives
Archer Resilience Management, Everbridge 360, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, SureCloudFour alternatives
Archer Business Continuity Management, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, Resolver GRC PlatformFive alternatives
Druva Data Security Cloud, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Veeam Data Platform, ZertoOne alternative
NogginMiniMax M2.5Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFusion Risk ManagementChangedFusion Risk ManagementSwimlane BCMagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect BCM, ServiceNow BCMno first choiceagainst: Archer, Continuity2, Drata, Fusion Risk Management, LogicGate, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Ncontracts, Noggin, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SharePoint, Sprinto, Vanta
Three alternatives
Fusion Framework System, MeridianBCMS, MetricStream Business Continuity ManagementThree alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, ServiceNow Business ContinuityFour alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Infinite Blue, LogicManager, Oracle Risk Management CloudGPT-6 LunaFusion Risk ManagementFusion Risk ManagementHeldFusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceeBRP Suiteagainst: Everbridge 360no first choiceagainst: Archer, NAVEX IRM Software, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
Everbridge 360 AI Prepare, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementThree alternatives
Everbridge Prepare, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMFour alternatives
Archer Business Continuity & IT Disaster Recovery, Everbridge 360 AI Prepare, Quantivate Business Continuity, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementOne alternative
SmartSuiteMuse Glimmer 30BFusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceFusion Risk ManagementChangedFusion Risk ManagementArcher Resilience Management, ServiceNow Business Continuity Managementagainst: Fusion Risk Management, Noggin, Riskonnect BCMFusion Risk Management / Fusion Framework Systemagainst: Castellan, Crisis24, Drata, Everbridge 360, GardaWorld, Infinite Blue / BC in the Cloud, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Mitratech Continuity Planning, OnSolve, Preparis, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, Vanta
Two alternatives
MetricStream Business Continuity Management, ParaSolutionTwo alternatives
Everbridge 360, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementFour alternatives
Everbridge 360, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:23 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:28 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 18 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 22 | 75 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:05 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 13 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:28 | yes | 17 | 90 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:51 | yes | 5 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:28 | yes | 17 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:38 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:35 | yes | 11 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:56 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:45 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 21 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 16 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:53 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:36 | yes | 22 | 53 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:07 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 6 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:19 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:51 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:19 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 21 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:20 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:58 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 7 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 16 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:56 | yes | 20 | 114 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:57 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 16 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:03 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:11 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:23 | yes | 6 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:39 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 12 | 56 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:33 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:51 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 35 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:16 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:24 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 19 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 21 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 22 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 19 | 91 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:31 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Everbridge read as Everbridge 360
Everbridge (BC in the Cloud) read as Everbridge 360
MetricStream read as MetricStream Business Continuity Management
MetricStream (GRC Suite) read as MetricStream Business Continuity Management
Riskonnect read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (Castellan) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (ex-Castellan) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (formerly Castellan) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (via Castellan acquisition) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (via Castellan) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect Business Continuity read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow (BCM Module) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Abriska 22301
Archer Business Continuity & IT Disaster Recovery
Archer Business Resilience
BCMLogic Next GRC Platform
Bloom
Crisis24
Diligent BCM
Diligent Risk Management
Everbridge Prepare
Everbridge Prepare / BC in the Cloud
GardaWorld
GlobalSuite Solutions
IBM Resiliency
Infinite Blue
Infinite Blue / BC in the Cloud
Lockpath
Microsoft Dynamics GRC
NAVEX IRM
NAVEX IRM / Lockpath
NAVEX IRM Software (Legacy)
Oracle Fusion Risk
ParaSolutions
RSA Archer Business Resiliency
ReddyBox
Relay
Resilience360 (DHL)
Resolver GRC Platform
SAP Risk Management
ServiceNow Business Continuity
SureCloud Operational Resilience
Swimlane BCM
TeamMate+
Zelios
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.