| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 11% | 2 of 120 | 19% | 32 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your engineers are heavily constrained, look at an agentless scanner (like Reflectiz) which can be spun up in hours with zero code changes.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client-side protection · scale prompt · first choice
“or Reflectiz if you want the fastest, lowest-effort deployment with strong supply-chain visibility and no code changes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · direct prompt · first choice
“Reflectiz's fully remote synthetic monitoring is often the lowest-friction starting point” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Reflectiz (with c/side as a strong runner-up)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · budget prompt · hard negative
“solutions from vendors like JScrambler, Reflectiz, Source Defense, and Human Security ... often fail to block the majority of sophisticated e-skimming attacks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“Popular vendors include Human Security, SourceDefense, JScrambler, and Reflectiz. ... JS agents detect behavior after a script has already executed.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“Vendors to be cautious about: HUMAN Security, SourceDefense, Jscrambler, and Reflectiz (when used solely for "in-browser" protection).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 84 answers that named Reflectiz and are not a share of its labels.
356 of the 400 domain citations in answers naming Reflectiz came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 278 | 24 | 2026-09-28 | GRC | |
| Conference or event | 28 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 27 | 4 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | 4 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-13 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2023-09-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2023-01-16 |
Every page reflectiz.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Reflectiz's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: reflectiz.com, reflectiz.com/plans, reflectiz.com/platform, reflectiz.com/customers, reflectiz.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reflectiz's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reflectiz, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reflectiz by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Reflectiz is among the products AI models recommend first in Client-side protection this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.