2 categories · RankedHUMAN Security
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bot management | Network and edge | 2% | 5 of 83 | 11% | 18 | accepted challenger | |
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 0% | 34 of 120 | 42% | 12 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated HUMAN Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Use client-side protection tools that provide active blocking and real-time monitoring (e.g., Feroot, Human Security)” Mistral Small · Client-side protection · negative prompt · first choice
“Leader in Forrester Wave Q3 2024 with top scores in strategy, detection models... #1 on G2 for Bot Detection and Mitigation” Grok 4.20 · Bot management · comparative prompt · first choice
“1. HUMAN Security (formerly PerimeterX) - Primary Strength: Advanced bot detection and fraud prevention.” Mistral Small · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose In-Browser Runtime Agents (Source Defense / HUMAN) if you operate a high-volume checkout or login page” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Popular vendors include Human Security, SourceDefense, JScrambler, and Reflectiz. ... JS agents detect behavior after a script has already executed.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“Vendors to be cautious about: HUMAN Security, SourceDefense, Jscrambler, and Reflectiz (when used solely for "in-browser" protection).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“Human Security (formerly PerimeterX) often fail to block the majority of sophisticated e-skimming attacks despite being deployed” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“Client-side JavaScript-based protections (e.g., for websites: HUMAN, Source Defense, JScrambler) can be bypassed” Grok 4.20 · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HUMAN Security, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HUMAN Security was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 94 answers that named HUMAN Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
314 of the 348 domain citations in answers naming HUMAN Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
humansecurity.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, HUMAN Security takes 2% of first choices and Cloudflare Bot Management takes 56%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“human security”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 408 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 165,749 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,795 · 230 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,987
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 94 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 94 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 19 | 0 | 2025-11-01 |
Most recent
- 2025-11-0112 conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page humansecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as HUMAN Security
Follow HUMAN Security
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HUMAN Security is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cybersecurity company that safeguards enterprises and internet platforms from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse.
- For
- enterprises and internet platforms
- Customers named
- TripleLiftVenatus MediaSweetwaterSamsonitePriceline
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What HUMAN Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: humansecurity.com, trust.humansecurity.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HUMAN Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HUMAN Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HUMAN Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HUMAN Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HUMAN Security, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.