| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 0% | 25 of 120 | 17% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you already use Cloudflare or Akamai for your CDN, their built-in client-side protection modules are worth evaluating first” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client-side protection · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose CDN-Integrated Edge Add-ons (Cloudflare Page Shield / Akamai) if you are already using their enterprise CDN/WAF services” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · alternative
“Broad edge platform with client-side script analysis, integrity checks, and bot detection; scales for high-traffic sites.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you're already on Cloudflare or Akamai and want quick integration → Page Shield” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“free/cheap add-on for script tracking via CSP reporting, but sampled/not as comprehensive for PCI” Grok 4.1 Fast · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“More expensive than other options; advanced features require Enterprise plan” Kimi K2 · Client-side protection · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 41 answers that named Cloudflare Page Shield and are not a share of its labels.
215 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming Cloudflare Page Shield came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cloudflare Page Shield's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-page-shield, developers.cloudflare.com/client-side-security, blog.cloudflare.com/page-shield-connection-monitor, blog.cloudflare.com/page-shield-generally-available, blog.cloudflare.com/page-shield-positive-blocking-policies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudflare Page Shield's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudflare Page Shield, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudflare Page Shield by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: