IT AI Index

Index › Products › Akamai Page Integrity Manager · October 2026 Edition

Akamai · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Akamai Page Integrity Manager

8Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Akamai Page Integrity Manager was named 3 times in Client-side protection, where cside led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business133 of 144

under the label threshold

Mid-market29 of 120

under the label threshold

Enterprise24 of 98

under the label threshold

In client-side protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Akamai Page Integrity Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Client-side protection	Security operations	0%	29 of 120	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Akamai Page Integrity Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Akamai Page Integrity Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“cside first, then Source Defense, Akamai Page Integrity Manager, Jscrambler, Imperva, Cloudflare Page Shield” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · alternative

“Works on any website (not just those on Akamai's platform), and provides real-time behavioral analysis” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Akamai Page Integrity Manager, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Akamai Page Integrity Manager was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Imperva Client-Side Protection7 of 81Not among the top eight

cside5 of 84Not among the top eight

Cloudflare Page Shield5 of 80Not among the top eight

Jscrambler Webpage Integrity5 of 80Not among the top eight

Reflectiz4 of 80Not among the top eight

Source Defense4 of 80Not among the top eight

DomDog3 of 81Not among the top eight

Feroot PaymentGuard3 of 81Not among the top eight

Feroot Security2 of 81Not among the top eight

HUMAN Security2 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Akamai Page Integrity Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Akamai Page Integrity Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cside.com7

g2.com5

imperva.com5

sourceforge.net5

us.fitgap.com5

f6s.com4

startupstash.com4

geeksframework.com3

reflectiz.com3

slashdot.org3

Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Akamai Page Integrity Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cside.com/blog/best-digital-skimming-protection7

cside.com/blog/top-client-side-security-tools-full-guide6

cside.com/compare6

g2.com/categories/client-side-protection5

imperva.com/products/client-side-protection-csp5

cside.com/blog/client-side-security-ecommerce-fintech-platforms4

cside.com/blog/solution-comparison-pci-dss-6-4-3-and-11-6-14

startupstash.com/top-client-side-protection-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Akamai Page Integrity Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Akamai Page Integrity Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.

Akamai Page Integrity Manager / Source Defense 1

Follow Akamai Page Integrity Manager

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Akamai is the company behind Akamai Page Integrity Manager.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Akamai: Akamai, Akamai API Security, Akamai App & API Protector, Akamai Bot Manager, Akamai Client-Side Protection, Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Akamai Connected Cloud, Akamai Edge DNS and 14 more

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akamai Page Integrity Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akamai Page Integrity Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akamai Page Integrity Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Akamai Page Integrity Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Akamai Page Integrity Manager, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.