Every category where a model named Jscrambler Webpage Integrity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Client-side protection	Security operations	7%	7 of 120	37%	30	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jscrambler Webpage Integrity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jscrambler Webpage Integrity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	3	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	1	3
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	4	6
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels5

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative24 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative20 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative85 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies handling payment data, Jscrambler offers the best balance of protection, compliance support, and mid-market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Client-side protection · direct prompt · first choice

“the best client-side protection tool for a company with a limited budget is Jscrambler” Llama 4 Maverick · Client-side protection · budget prompt · first choice

“Jscrambler is also recommended for SMBs and mid-market companies” Mistral Small · Client-side protection · direct prompt · first choice

“If you have AppSec resources, an in-browser runtime tool (like Jscrambler or c/side) will give you far stronger active blocking capabilities.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client-side protection · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools that scramble your JavaScript code (like JSObfuscator or Jscrambler)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client-side protection · negative prompt · hard negative

“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · budget prompt · hard negative

“Vendors to Review Carefully: ... solutions from vendors like JScrambler, Reflectiz, Source Defense, and Human Security ... often fail to block the majority of sophisticated e-skimming attacks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative

“Popular vendors include Human Security, SourceDefense, JScrambler, and Reflectiz. ... JS agents detect behavior after a script has already executed.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jscrambler Webpage Integrity was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Reflectiz54 of 859Compare →

Source Defense49 of 854Compare →

Imperva Client-Side Protection40 of 856Compare →

cside37 of 8515Compare →

HUMAN Security33 of 852Not among the top eight

Cloudflare Page Shield25 of 852Not among the top eight

Feroot PaymentGuard23 of 853Compare →

Feroot Security20 of 856Not among the top eight

DomDog12 of 852Not among the top eight

c/side11 of 855Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jscrambler Webpage Integrity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 85 answers that named Jscrambler Webpage Integrity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cside.com80

g2.com56

sourceforge.net52

us.fitgap.com48

startupstash.com43

slashdot.org38

geeksframework.com37

topbusinesssoftware.com32

reflectiz.com26

imperva.com25

437 of the 437 domain citations in answers naming Jscrambler Webpage Integrity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cside.com/blog/top-client-side-security-tools-full-guide76

g2.com/categories/client-side-protection44

startupstash.com/top-client-side-protection-tools43

geeksframework.com/software/client-side-protection-solutions37

cside.com/compare23

sourceforge.net/software/client-side-protection22

imperva.com/products/client-side-protection-csp21

us.fitgap.com/search/client-side-protection-solutions/enterprise21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jscrambler.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity takes 7% of first choices and cside takes 13%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “client-side protection tool”

Position for “client-side protection tools”

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“jscrambler webpage integrity”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 3,194 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,499 · 48 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,166
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 65 image, 29 text, 26 video · 42 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as Jscrambler SA, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 102 in the year, 18 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 120 in client-side protection

Segment leader

13%

cside

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 85 answers
Its own site cited: in 84 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on jscrambler.com

688

subdomains included

Content

570

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

2 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	367	19	2026-09-29	Client-side protection, App shielding
Glossary or explainer	93	19	2026-09-28	SIEM, App shielding
Webinar or virtual event	49	42	2026-09-28	Client-side protection
News or press	22	3	2026-07-30
Case study	17	12	2026-07-26
Comparison	11	4	2026-09-25	CDN
Report or ebook	5	0	2020-05-19
Template or tool	3	0	2025-12-23
Conference or event	2	0	2026-04-10
Podcast or video	1	0	2018-09-07

Most recent

2026-09-29Beyond vendor assessments managing third party risk blog
2026-09-28Pci ssc europe community meeting 2026 webinar or virtual event
2026-09-28Beyond consent what happens after reject webinar or virtual event
2026-09-28Ai generated code security glossary or explainer
2026-09-25Jscrambler vs consent management platforms cmps comparison
2026-09-22Steps preempt cipa litigation blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page jscrambler.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity; a claim can dispute any of them.

Jscrambler 24JScrambler 4Jscrambler (Webpage Integrity) 1

Follow Jscrambler Webpage Integrity

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Jscrambler Webpage Integrity is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The unified client-side security platform that enforces software integrity and data governance where it’s born — at runtime
jscrambler.com
For: partners
jscrambler.com/partners
Free plan or trial: Free Trial jscrambler.com
Customers named: Fortune 500 Retail CompanyMajor KYC ProviderMarriott Vacations WorldwideScentbird
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Jscrambler Webpage Integrity's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: jscrambler.com, jscrambler.com/platform-overview, jscrambler.com/customer-stories, jscrambler.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jscrambler Webpage Integrity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jscrambler Webpage Integrity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Jscrambler Webpage Integrity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.