AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Akamai Client-Side Protection · October 2026 Edition
Akamai · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Akamai Client-Side Protection

10Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Akamai Client-Side Protection was named 3 times in Client-side protection, where cside led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In client-side protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Akamai Client-Side Protection for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Client-side protectionSecurity operations0%28 of 1200%3under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Akamai Client-Side Protection yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Akamai Client-Side Protection across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Great if you're already using Akamai CDN/edge services... may feel heavier for smaller mid-market setups.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Client-side protection · direct prompt · alternative
“their built-in client-side protection modules are worth evaluating first for ease of procurement” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client-side protection · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for large-scale retail/e-commerce operations where downtime is critical.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client-side protection · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Akamai Client-Side Protection, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Akamai Client-Side Protection was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Imperva Client-Side Protection7 of 103Not among the top eight
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity7 of 101Not among the top eight
cside5 of 101Not among the top eight
Reflectiz4 of 102Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Page Shield4 of 101Not among the top eight
Source Defense3 of 101Not among the top eight
Feroot PaymentGuard3 of 100Not among the top eight
HUMAN Security2 of 101Not among the top eight
DomDog2 of 100Not among the top eight
Bitdefender GravityZone1 of 101Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Akamai Client-Side Protection. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Akamai Client-Side Protection and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cside.com8
g2.com7
us.fitgap.com6
slashdot.org5
topbusinesssoftware.com5
geeksframework.com4
imperva.com4
sourceforge.net4
akamai.comYour site3
f6s.com3

Forty-six of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Akamai Client-Side Protection came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Akamai Client-Side Protection stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
30 a month (“akamai client-side protection”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Its own site
It sits on Akamai's site (akamai.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 120 in client-side protection
Segment leader
13%
cside
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
10 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Akamai Client-Side Protection

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Akamai is the company behind Akamai Client-Side Protection.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akamai Client-Side Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akamai Client-Side Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akamai Client-Side Protection by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Akamai Client-Side Protection is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Akamai Client-Side Protection, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at akamai.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.