Client-side protection · October 2026 Edition
Reflectiz vs Imperva Client-Side Protection
One of fourteen models named Reflectiz first on the direct prompt; one named Imperva Client-Side Protection. Reflectiz was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Imperva Client-Side Protection by twelve and Reflectiz carries 32 labels and Imperva Client-Side Protection 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share11%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels3220A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Reflectiz reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.cside vs Reflectiz · cside vs Imperva Client-Side Protection · Reflectiz vs Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client-side protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ReflectizFirst choices, of fourteen modelsImperva Client-Side Protection
Direct11
Paraphrase30
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Reflectiz · 2 against Imperva Client-Side Protection
Scale-constrained10
Negative005 against Reflectiz
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Reflectiz and Imperva Client-Side Protection were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 84 answers naming Reflectiz and the 64 naming Imperva Client-Side Protection. In those answers Imperva Client-Side Protection took the first choice three times and Reflectiz two.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Reflectiz and Imperva Client-Side Protection stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Reflectiz Imperva Client-Side Protection first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Reflectiz on the left and Imperva Client-Side Protection on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Reflectiz and Imperva Client-Side Protection stood in it.
Reflectiz first, Imperva Client-Side Protection not the choice
1 of 14 modelsImperva Client-Side Protection was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashReflectiz, cside alternatives: Cloudflare's Client-Side Security
Imperva Client-Side Protection first, Reflectiz not the choice
1 of 14 modelsReflectiz was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Grok 4.1 FastImperva Client-Side Protection alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniF5 Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense alternatives: Feroot Security Inspector, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Client-Side Security alternatives: Reflectiz, Report URI, c/side
Qwen 3.7 FlashCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
GLM 4.7 FlashXJscrambler Webpage Integrity alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Muse Glimmer 30BBitdefender GravityZone Business Security alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Perplexity SonarAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance alternatives: Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, cside
Mistral SmallAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Llama 4 MaverickAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Client-Side Protection and Compliance Platform
Kimi K2Source Defense, c/side alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security
MiniMax M2.5Bitdefender GravityZone alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
GPT-6 LunaSophos MDR Complete alternatives: Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Reflectiz leads by two points.
Reflectiz5%#3 of 9Imperva Client-Side Protection4%#5 of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
Reflectiz leads by nine points.
Reflectiz11%#2 of 8Imperva Client-Side Protection2%#6 of 8Enterprise
Reflectiz leads by four points.
Reflectiz10%#2 of 10Imperva Client-Side Protection6%#6 of 10What the models said about Reflectiz
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Reflectiz, Feroot, DomDog, Jscrambler” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“solutions from vendors like JScrambler, Reflectiz, Source Defense, and Human Security ... often fail to block the majority of sophisticated e-skimming attacks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Popular vendors include Human Security, SourceDefense, JScrambler, and Reflectiz. ... JS agents detect behavior after a script has already executed.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“If your engineers are heavily constrained, look at an agentless scanner (like Reflectiz) which can be spun up in hours with zero code changes.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“or Reflectiz if you want the fastest, lowest-effort deployment with strong supply-chain visibility and no code changes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Reflectiz's fully remote synthetic monitoring is often the lowest-friction starting point” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Imperva Client-Side Protection
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid: Enterprise solutions like Akamai, Imperva, or Feroot” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“compared to enterprise solutions like Akamai or Imperva” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Imperva Client-Side Protection stands out as one of the top choices for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Imperva Client-Side Protection monitors all third-party JavaScript running on sites, detecting and blocking malicious activity in real-time” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“listed in the client-side protection category as a solution that monitors all third-party JavaScript running on sites” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
cside vs Reflectizcside vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionReflectiz vs Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityReflectiz vs Source DefenseReflectiz vs Feroot PaymentGuardJscrambler Webpage Integrity vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionSource Defense vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionFeroot PaymentGuard vs Imperva Client-Side ProtectionAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full client-side protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.