AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Ping Identity / ForgeRock · October 2026 Edition
Ping · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Ping Identity / ForgeRock

5Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ping Identity / ForgeRock was named 1 time in Workforce identity, where Microsoft Entra ID led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In workforce identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ping Identity / ForgeRock for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Workforce identity and SSOIdentity and access0%38 of 44100%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 46%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Ping Identity / ForgeRock held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Workforce identity · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 32 of 38, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 35 of 46

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Workforce identity0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 38 of 44, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Ping Identity / ForgeRock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Cautious due to consolidation chaos” Kimi K2 · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ping Identity / ForgeRock, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ping Identity / ForgeRock was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Auth03 of 51Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra External ID3 of 50Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra ID2 of 50Not among the top eight
Okta Workforce Identity2 of 50Not among the top eight
Amazon Cognito1 of 50Not among the top eight
SSOJet1 of 50Not among the top eight
Thales1 of 50Not among the top eight
WorkOS1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ping Identity / ForgeRock. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Ping Identity / ForgeRock and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clerk.com3
guideflow.com3
guptadeepak.com3
okta.com3
securityboulevard.com3
avatier.com2
cybersecuritynews.com2
decryptiondigest.com2
nhimg.org2
ssojet.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Ping Identity / ForgeRock came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pingidentity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ping Identity / ForgeRock takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID takes 46%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “workforce identity platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce identity platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Its company's site
pingidentity.com shared with Ping's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 73,959 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,378 · 940 in the top three
Sites linking to it
10,341
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $30 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
105 ads · 92 text, 7 image, 6 video · 55 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2024, as Ping Identity, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 29 in the year, 76 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 38 of 44 in workforce identity
Segment leader
46%
Microsoft Entra ID
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Ping Identity / ForgeRock

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ping is the company behind Ping Identity / ForgeRock.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
ForgeRock can help your business provide registration, authentication and anomaly detection all as discrete services in the cloud.
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Ping Identity / ForgeRock's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: videos.pingidentity.com/detail/video/6341859042112/forgerock-identity-cloud, videos.pingidentity.com/detail/video/6336771576112/andre-durand-|-ping-identity-forgerock, pingidentity.com/en/company/ping-newsroom/forgerock-archives/news.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ping Identity / ForgeRock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ping Identity / ForgeRock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ping Identity / ForgeRock by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Ping Identity / ForgeRock is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ping Identity / ForgeRock, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pingidentity.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.