IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › WSO2 Identity Server · September 2026 Edition
WSO2 · 1 category · Ranked

WSO2 Identity Server

11Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CIAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 49 of 74 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market49 of 74
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 60
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named WSO2 Identity Server for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Customer identity and access managementIdentity and access0%49 of 740%1under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WSO2 Identity Server yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WSO2 Identity Server across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WSO2 Identity Server, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WSO2 Identity Server was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Auth011 of 117Not in the top three
Microsoft Entra External ID11 of 111Not in the top three
Ping Identity11 of 111Not in the top three
IBM Verify11 of 110Not in the top three
Descope5 of 111Not in the top three
Frontegg4 of 110Not in the top three
LoginRadius4 of 110Not in the top three
Stytch4 of 110Not in the top three
WorkOS4 of 110Not in the top three
Clerk3 of 110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WSO2 Identity Server. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named WSO2 Identity Server and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

startwithidentity.com9
guptadeepak.com8
expertinsights.com7
loginradius.com6
securityboulevard.com6
cygnet.one4
descope.com4
peerspot.com4
worldmetrics.org4
gartner.com3

Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming WSO2 Identity Server came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-customer-identity-and-access-managem7
guptadeepak.com/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-depth-comparison7
startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-ciam-for-enterprises7
loginradius.com/blog/identity/top-ciam-for-large-enterprises6
securityboulevard.com/2026/08/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-2026-in-depth-comparison6
cygnet.one/feeds/blog/best-customer-identity-access-management4
peerspot.com/categories/customer-identity-and-access-management-ciam4
descope.com/blog/post/ciam-solutions3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WSO2 Identity Server's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WSO2 Identity Server, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wso2.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack