Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
WSO2 · 1 category · RankedWSO2 Identity Server
12Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CIAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 56 of 70 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 100% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market56 of 70
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 69
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WSO2 Identity Server for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 0% | 56 of 70 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WSO2 Identity Server held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CIAM · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 16 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 56 of 70 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WSO2 Identity Server across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WSO2 Identity Server across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“every platform on this list except WSO2 now ships a dedicated AI agent identity product to general availability” Muse Glimmer 30B · CIAM · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WSO2 Identity Server, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WSO2 Identity Server was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WSO2 Identity Server, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WSO2 Identity Server was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WSO2 Identity Server. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named WSO2 Identity Server and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
securityboulevard.com11
cybersecuritynews.com9
g2.com7
loginradius.com7
descope.com6
guideflow.com6
guptadeepak.com6
startwithidentity.com6
workos.com5
checkthat.ai4
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming WSO2 Identity Server came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wso2.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WSO2 Identity Server takes 0% of first choices and Frontegg takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wso2.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WSO2 Identity Server takes 0% of first choices and Frontegg takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer identity platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “customer identity platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“wso2 identity server”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Its company's site
- wso2.com shared with WSO2's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,715 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,933 · 65 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,472
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 70 in CIAM
Segment leader
21%
Frontegg
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow WSO2 Identity Server
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WSO2 is the company behind WSO2 Identity Server.ShowHide
The company
WSO2 is the company behind WSO2 Identity Server.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from WSO2
- WSO2 AI Gateway, WSO2 API Manager
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Secure humans, apps, and AI agents everywhere
- For
- Organizations worldwide
- Price stated
- Open source or subscription wso2.com/identity-platform
- Starting price
- 0.00 wso2.com/identity-platform
- Free plan or trial
- Sign Up for Free wso2.com/identity-platform
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001
- Hosting
- on-premisesprivate cloudpublic cloudfully managed SaaSself-hosted
- Customers named
- Hard Rock
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What WSO2 Identity Server's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: wso2.com/identity-platform, wso2.com/identity-platform/pricing, wso2.com/identity-platform/agent-id, wso2.com/identity-platform/identity-server, wso2.com/identity-platform/service-uptimes. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WSO2 Identity Server's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WSO2 Identity Server, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WSO2 Identity Server by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WSO2 Identity Server is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WSO2 Identity Server, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.