Vulnerability management platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “vulnerability management platform”, and as “vulnerability scanning and management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Tenable Vulnerability Management 32%
32Qualys VMDR32Tenable Vulnerability Management13Tenable One23others
32% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Qualys VMDR (36%) replaces Tenable Vulnerability Management (45% then, 31% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Qualys VMDR leads at 36%, replacing Tenable Vulnerability Management, which led at 45% and stands at 31% now: 4 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled. The verdict moved from clear leader to contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Intruder45%Clear leader▼−13Since September 2026: 59% → 46%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Rapid7 InsightVM30%Contested▼−16Since September 2026: 45% → 29%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Qualys VMDR32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Qualys VMDR (36%) replaces Tenable Vulnerability Management (45% then, 31% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This page
Intruder45%Clear leader▼−13Since September 2026: 59% → 46%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketRapid7 InsightVM30%Contested▼−16Since September 2026: 45% → 29%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseQualys VMDR32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Qualys VMDR (36%) replaces Tenable Vulnerability Management (45% then, 31% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Qualys VMDR32%21%67endorsed leader▲+18Since September 2026: 18% → 36%, +18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 36%
Qualys VMDR32%21%67endorsed leader▲+18Since September 2026: 18% → 36%, +18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 36%02
Tenable Vulnerability Management32%21%57endorsed leader▼−14Since September 2026: 45% → 31%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.45% → 31%
Tenable Vulnerability Management32%21%57endorsed leader▼−14Since September 2026: 45% → 31%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.45% → 31%03
Tenable One13%6%16accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 11%
Tenable One13%6%16accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 11%04Rapid7 InsightVM8%20%66accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 7%
Rapid7 InsightVM8%20%66accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 7%05
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management8%10%29accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 9%
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management8%10%29accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 9%06
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus2%15%13accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus2%15%13accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
OpenVAS0%100%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OpenVAS0%100%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Wiz0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Wiz0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Rapid7 InsightVM vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusRapid7 InsightVM vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM vs Vicarius vRxRapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable NessusTenable Vulnerability Management vs IntruderTenable Vulnerability Management vs Qualys VMDRTenable Vulnerability Management vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusTenable Vulnerability Management vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Management vs Vicarius vRxTenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable NessusIntruder vs Qualys VMDRIntruder vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusIntruder vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementIntruder vs Vicarius vRxIntruder vs Tenable NessusQualys VMDR vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusQualys VMDR vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDR vs Vicarius vRxQualys VMDR vs Tenable NessusManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Vicarius vRxManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Tenable NessusMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Vicarius vRxMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Tenable NessusVicarius vRx vs Tenable Nessus
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Qualys VMDR32%
Qualys VMDR32%02Tenable Vulnerability Management32%
Tenable Vulnerability Management32%03Tenable One13%
Tenable One13%04Rapid7 InsightVM8%
Rapid7 InsightVM8%05Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management8%
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management8%06ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus2%
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus2%07CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management0%08Wiz0%
Wiz0%09OpenVAS0%
OpenVAS0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Rapid7 InsightVM20%
13 of 66 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Enterprises should be cautious about—or avoid—Tenable, Rapid7 InsightVM, and to some extent Qualys” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Tenable Vulnerability Management21%
12 of 57 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid** platforms ... that focus only on detection without remediation (Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7, ManageEngine)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
OpenVAS100%
11 of 11 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“"Repeatedly criticized for heavy false positives... Good as a free baseline, but not for production accuracy." ... "Not recommended for generalist IT admins"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Qualys VMDR21%
14 of 67 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Avoid** platforms that are pure scanners (Nessus, OpenVAS, Nuclei) or that focus only on detection without remediation (Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7, ManageEngine)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1081 links across 238 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · RiskWatch46 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Orca40 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Vicarius31 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Motadata26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PDQ26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Tenable25 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SureCloud23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
46 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualys VMDR qualys.com | 32% | 162 | 320 | 16 | 26,929 | 46 | 7 | |
| Tenable tenable.com Tenable Vulnerability Management 32% | 32% | 148 | 27,100 | 1,194 | 187,567 company | $9,764 | 62 | 1 |
| Tenable parent site Tenable One 13% | 13% | 27 | 27,100 | 1,194 | ||||
| Rapid7 rapid7.com Rapid7 InsightVM 8% | 8% | 168 | 14,800 | 798 | 123,299 company | $609 | 30 | |
| Microsoft Defender parent site Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management 8% | 8% | 70 | 18,100 | 3,525 | ||||
| ManageEngine parent site ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus 2% | 2% | 78 | 8,100 | 675 | ||||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 342 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| DefectDojo defectdojo.com | 2% | 52 | 880 | 9 | 603 | 1 | ||
| Qualys Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response | 2% | |||||||
| CrowdStrike parent site CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management 0%, CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight 0% | 0% | 44 | 74,000 | 5,130 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, orca.security, surecloud.com, tenable.com). The first result for “best vulnerability management platform” is surecloud.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best vulnerability management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vulnerability scanning and management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade vulnerability management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best vulnerability management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a vulnerability management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which vulnerability management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceQualys VMDRChangedagainst: OpenVASTenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDRno first choiceagainst: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Nuclei, OpenVAS
Three alternatives
Acunetix, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable NessusFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementGPT-5.4 miniQualys VMDRTenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedagainst: Rapid7 InsightVMQualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable One, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDRagainst: CrowdStrike, Tenable Oneno first choiceagainst: Cisco's former Kenna Security / vulnerability management offering, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Three alternatives
Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable One, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementOne alternative
Qualys VMDRThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Rapid7 InsightVMGemini 3.5 FlashQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDR, Tenable OneChangedagainst: Tenable NessusTenable Vulnerability ManagementDefectDojoagainst: Mend.io, Snykno first choiceagainst: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Five alternatives
Brinqa, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Nucleus Security, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Nucleus Security, Rapid7 InsightVMFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizSeven alternatives
Aikido Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable OneFour alternatives
Brinqa, Cisco, Nucleus Security, Vulcan CyberPerplexity SonarTenable OneQualys VMDRChangedQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plusagainst: Rapid7 Insight Platformno first choiceagainst: Nuclei, OpenVAS, RiskWatch, UpGuard
Three alternatives
Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management, Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Platform, ZafranOne alternative
TaniumFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Exposure Management, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementGrok 4.1 FastQualys Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedQualys VMDR, Tenable OneMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Qualys VMDRQualys VMDRagainst: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Two alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable One, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementFive alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable One, WizMistral SmallQualys VMDR, Tenable OneQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMno first choiceagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Two alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Rapid7 InsightVMOne alternative
Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
BeyondTrust, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMDeepSeek V4 FlashTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementHeldQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementagainst: Qualys VMDRno first choiceagainst: Aikido Security, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, OpenVAS, Orca Security, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Sprinto, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tripwire, Wiz
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizTwo alternatives
Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Qwen 3.7 FlashQualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDRChangedQualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDRagainst: Tenable Vulnerability Managementno first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, OpenVAS, Splunk
Two alternatives
Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementOne alternative
CrowdStrikeKimi K2Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementHeldno first choiceMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Managementno first choiceagainst: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Two alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure ManagementGLM 4.7 FlashXRapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementagainst: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Managementno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft, Nuclei, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Three alternatives
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDROne alternative
Qualys TruRiskSeven alternatives
BeyondTrust, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Rapid7 InsightVMOne alternative
WizMiniMax M2.5Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Managementno first choiceChangedTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Oneagainst: Qualys VMDRQualys VMDR, Tenable Onenothing named
Three alternatives
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Vicarius vRxFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMOne alternative
Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Rapid7 InsightVMGPT-6 LunaTenable OneTenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedno first choiceRapid7 InsightVMno first choiceagainst: Cisco Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightVM
Two alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementMuse Glimmer 30BTenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDR, Tenable One, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedQualys VMDR, Tenable OneAikido Securityagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Managementno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, OpenVAS
Two alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMOne alternative
Rapid7 InsightVMFour alternatives
Cisco Vulnerability Management, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Vornin, VulNova Vulnerability Management PlatformBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:53 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:21 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 9 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 24 | 124 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:52 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:03 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:55 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 6 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 23 | 71 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 19 | 137 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:15 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 7 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:52 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:15 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 14 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:52 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:53 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:25 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 23 | 86 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 24 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 30 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:18 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 21 | 118 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 3 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ManageEngine read as ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Nexpose (non-InsightVM) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Nucleus read as Nucleus Security
Orca read as Orca Security
Qualys read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys (Enterprise TruRisk Platform / VMDR) read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys (VMDR - Vulnerability Management, Detection & Response) read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys (Vulnerability Management, DR) read as Qualys VMDR
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 (InsightVM / Insight Platform) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 (InsightVM / InsightCloudSec) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 (InsightVM) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Tenable read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Nessus/One Exposure Management) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Nessus) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Tenable Vulnerability Management) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable Vulnerability Management / Tenable One) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable.ot / Tenable One) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (especially Tenable.io and Tenable.sc) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable One / Tenable Vulnerability Management read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable One Vulnerability Management read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Vicarius read as Vicarius vRx
Unresolved, counted raw
Cisco Kenna
Cisco's former Kenna Security / vulnerability management offering
Cybervision
Greenbone Enterprise Appliance
Nessus Expert
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Exposure Management
Qualys TruRisk
Qualys Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response (VMDR)
Rapid7 Insight Platform
Rezilion
ServiceNow Unified Security Exposure Management
Vornin
VulNova Vulnerability Management Platform
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.