Tenable · 3 categories · RankedTenable Vulnerability Management
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 7% | 5 of 80 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 39 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59% |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 35 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd generally recommend Tenable Vulnerability Management if you want a balance of coverage, easier operationalization, and room to grow.” GPT-5.4 mini · Vuln management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tenable is the detection leader with a plugin library exceeding 219,000 signatures, the largest in the market by a significant margin” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Vuln management · comparative prompt · first choice
“Positioning: The market leader for organizations already using vulnerability management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ASM · comparative prompt · first choice
“best overall default choice is usually Tenable Vulnerability Management” GPT-5.4 mini · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 64 answers that named Tenable Vulnerability Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
223 of the 223 domain citations in answers naming Tenable Vulnerability Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tenable Vulnerability Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tenable Vulnerability Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tenable.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.