AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management · October 2026 Edition
CrowdStrike · 2 categories · Ranked

CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management

44Judge labels
1First choices
7Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in ASM for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 100 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In asm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%18 of 10012%8under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Vulnerability management platformsSecurity operations0%18 of 770%5under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · ASM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 86 → 90 of 93
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 24 of 98
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 81

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ASM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 22 → 18 of 100
Vuln management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 14 → 18 of 77

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2002002
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna02103
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative18 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management; it can work with third-party endpoint environments, but check which capabilities and integrations you'd actually use” GPT-6 Luna · ASM · direct prompt · alternative
“Best For: Existing CrowdStrike customers who want to eliminate active vulnerability scans” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Vuln management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Combines external attack-surface discovery with broader exposure capabilities” GPT-6 Luna · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Not the best choice as a standalone, stack-agnostic ASM solution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“strong product, but generally better suited to companies already invested in CrowdStrike” GPT-5.4 mini · ASM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Rapid7 InsightVM21 of 441Not among the top eight
Qualys VMDR19 of 446Not among the top eight
Tenable Vulnerability Management16 of 449Not among the top eight
Cortex Xpanse15 of 444Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management15 of 442Not among the top eight
CyCognito14 of 443Not among the top eight
Wiz14 of 441Not among the top eight
Tenable Attack Surface Management13 of 443Not among the top eight
Censys ASM8 of 440Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 44 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com15
orca.security15
crowdstrike.comYour site14
paloaltonetworks.com14
wiz.io14
riskwatch.com12
tenable.com12
gartner.com11
heimdalsecurity.com11
synack.com11

115 of the 129 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
210 a month (“crowdstrike falcon exposure management”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Its own site
It sits on CrowdStrike's site (crowdstrike.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 100 in ASM
Segment leader
49%
Intruder
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
44 answers
Its own site cited
in 44 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management (Falcon Spotlight) 1CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management (Falcon Surface) 1Falcon Exposure Management 1

Follow CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CrowdStrike is the company behind CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Know what’s exploitable
Price stated
por endpoint / por año; por endpoint / por mes crowdstrike.com/es-latam/platform/exposure-management
Free plan or trial
Try CrowdStrike free for 15 days crowdstrike.com/platform/exposure-management
Customers named
Intermexthe ALDO GroupAvalon Healthcare SolutionsALDO Group
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications, hosting

What CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: crowdstrike.com/platform/exposure-management, crowdstrike.com/platform/exposure-management/xiot-old, crowdstrike.com/es-latam/platform/exposure-management, crowdstrike.com/en-us/interactive-demos/falcon-exposure-management, crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/exposure-management/creating-configuration-assessment-rules. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.