Rapid7 · 3 categories · RankedRapid7 InsightVM
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 45% | 1 of 80 | 8% | 36 | endorsed leader |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 53 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59% |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 49 of 53 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Pick Rapid7 if your team (5–20 people) needs actionable, exploit-focused insights without massive setup—frequently called out for mid-market.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
“For mid-market organizations (under 30,000 assets) prioritizing remediation workflow integration... InsightVM is frequently the best fit” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for: Risk-based prioritization and ease of use... Choose Rapid7 if you want to focus on fixing the things that pose an actual risk” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Rapid7 InsightVM if you want the strongest balance of prioritization, usability, and fit” Perplexity Sonar · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Rapid7 InsightVM are often criticized by pure-cloud shops for high resource consumption and lower accuracy in detecting configuration drift” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CSPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fewer widespread complaints vs. others, but users note it's pricier for mid-market and less agent-efficient for unmanaged assets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Vuln management · negative prompt · soft negative
“users have reported issues such as poor support, confusing tag management, weak synchronization, and documentation gaps” GPT-5.4 mini · Vuln management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good product, but often better for teams with a bit more budget... may not be the cheapest fit.” GPT-5.4 mini · Vuln management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 109 answers that named Rapid7 InsightVM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
402 of the 402 domain citations in answers naming Rapid7 InsightVM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapid7 InsightVM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapid7 InsightVM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rapid7.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.