Every category where a model named Wiz for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	46%	1 of 57	18%	55	endorsed leader
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	43%	1 of 53	15%	59	endorsed leader
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	4%	7 of 78	29%	38	criticized challenger
Vulnerability management platforms	Security operations	0%	14 of 80	6%	16	accepted challenger
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	14 of 104	8%	13	accepted challenger
Data loss prevention	Security operations	0%	45 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wiz yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wiz across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	3	5	2	12
GPT-5.4 mini	4	1	2	4	11
Gemini 3.5 Flash	8	7	1	6	22
Perplexity Sonar	6	2	1	2	11
Grok 4.1 Fast	9	6	3	2	20
Mistral Small	6	1	3	1	11
DeepSeek V4 Flash	7	3	5	5	20
Llama 4 Maverick	4	1	8	0	13
Qwen 3.7 Flash	6	2	5	2	15
Kimi K2	7	3	4	4	18
GLM 4.7 FlashX	5	4	4	2	15
MiniMax M2.5	5	3	4	2	14

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct107 labels47

Paraphrase79 labels45

Comparative124 labels45not counted in share

Budget-constrained64 labels5

Scale-constrained73 labels14

Negative76 labels11not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative523 labels in all, every segment counted; 111 of the 167 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wiz or Orca Security | Most mid-sized companies with multi-cloud footprints. | Pros: Best-in-class UI, agentless, incredible attack-path prioritization.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CSPM · scale prompt · first choice

“Wiz is known for its agentless visibility and attack-path context, making it a good choice for teams that want quick onboarding and broad coverage without agents.” Llama 4 Maverick · CSPM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Extremely popular, pioneered the agentless graph-based approach, and offers great UX. It is incredibly easy to use but tends to be on the pricier end” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CNAPP · scale prompt · first choice

“Market leader by adoption ... Choose Wiz or Orca if you need fast, comprehensive visibility across multi-cloud with minimal operational overhead” Kimi K2 · CNAPP · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid at low budget ... Wiz, Orca, Prisma Cloud, Lacework ... overkill for a company on a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CSPM · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid big CNAPPs like Palo Alto Prisma or Wiz unless you need broader cloud workload coverage.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Container security · direct prompt · hard negative

“Orca/Wiz | $7K+/mo (small) | Agentless full CNAPP | Avoid for tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · CNAPP · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid at all costs on a limited budget: Enterprise suites like Wiz” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CSPM · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wiz, over the 523 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wiz was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Prisma Cloud326 of 52313Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Cloud287 of 52365Compare →

Orca Security241 of 52312Compare →

Aqua Security140 of 52327Not in the top three

Sysdig115 of 5237Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security98 of 5231Not in the top three

Orca86 of 5230Not in the top three

Prowler83 of 52325Compare →

Sysdig Secure78 of 52313Not in the top three

Snyk73 of 5238Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wiz. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 431 of the 523 answers that named Wiz and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org282

gbhackers.com242

cybersecuritynews.com203

expertinsights.com200

cloudaware.com153

orca.security152

gartner.com129

decryptiondigest.com117

sentinelone.com97

g2.com93

1,668 of the 1,668 domain citations in answers naming Wiz came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudaware.com/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-vendors117

cyberpress.org/cnapp-platforms-by-business-size-2114

cyberpress.org/cspm-tools-by-business-size-2114

gbhackers.com/best-cspm-compared96

orca.security/resources/blog/best-cspm-tools79

complyjet.com/blog/best-cspm-tools78

gbhackers.com/best-cnapp-compared78

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-cloud-native-application-protection-platfo76

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wiz

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wiz; a claim can dispute any of them.

Wiz CNAPP 2Wiz CSPM 2Wiz (Wiz ASM) 1Wiz (container module) 1Wiz (now Google Cloud) 1Wiz Container Security 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wiz's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wiz, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wiz.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.