Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 67 → 76 of 76
Tenable · 4 categories · RankedTenable One
29Judge labels
7First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Vuln management for enterprise buyers
Rank 66 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business81 of 82
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market66 of 77
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 68
13%16 labels
accepted challenger
In vuln management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tenable One for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 66 of 77 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Identity threat detection and response | Identity and access | 0% | 71 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51% | |
| OT and IoT security | Security operations | 0% | 51 of 107 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21% | |
| SIEM platforms | Security operations | 0% | 35 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 38% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tenable One held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Vuln management · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 59 of 74, unchanged
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 66 of 77, unchanged |
| ITDR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 105, unchanged |
| OT/IoT security | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 107, unchanged |
| SIEM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 61, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tenable One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tenable One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels3
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative5 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tenable One - Better for organizations needing broader exposure management” MiniMax M2.5 · Vuln management · direct prompt · alternative
“Best "Pay-as-you-go" Exposure Management: Tenable One (with OT add-on)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · alternative
“Exabeam / Tenable.one: Strong on risk scores and behavior analytics” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SIEM · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for Visibility (Cloud & On-Prem Mixed)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITDR · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“the broader Tenable One package may be more than you need” GPT-6 Luna · Vuln management · direct prompt · soft negative
“Great for broad coverage, but more enterprise-focused” MiniMax M2.5 · Vuln management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tenable One, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tenable One was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tenable One, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tenable One was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tenable One. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 29 answers that named Tenable One and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tenable.comYour site16
techrepublic.com14
orca.security12
riskwatch.com10
motadata.com8
riskpublishing.com8
guideflow.com7
qualys.com7
vicarius.io7
expertinsights.com6
Seventy-nine of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming Tenable One came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Tenable One stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Tenable One stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“tenable one”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 37 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Tenable's site (tenable.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 66 of 77 in vuln management
Segment leader
30%
Rapid7 InsightVM
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 29 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Tenable One
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tenable One; a claim can dispute any of them.
Tenable One (with IdV module) 1Tenable One/Nessus 1Tenable Vulnerability Management / Tenable One 1Tenable.one 1
Follow Tenable One
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tenable is the company behind Tenable One.ShowHide
The company
Tenable is the company behind Tenable One.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- la piattaforma leader di gestione dell'esposizione basata sull'IA
- Price stated
- سنة واحدة $3,700 سنتان $7,215 3 سنوات $10,545 ar.tenable.com/products/tenable-one
- Starting price
- 3700 ar.tenable.com/products/tenable-one
- Free plan or trial
- 無料でお試しください jp.tenable.com/products/tenable-one
- Integrations claimed
- 300 it.tenable.com/products/tenable-one
- Hosting
- الولايات المتحدةكنداالمملكة المتحدةألمانياسنغافورةأستراليااليابانالبرازيل
- Customers named
- Joseph Burkhard, Director - Security & Privacy, ProtivitiProtiviti
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications
What Tenable One's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: it.tenable.com/products/tenable-one, jp.tenable.com/products/tenable-one, fr.tenable.com/products/tenable-one, kr.tenable.com/products/tenable-one, ar.tenable.com/products/tenable-one. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tenable One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tenable One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tenable One by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tenable One is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tenable One, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.