AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Security operations › Vuln management › Small business › October 2026 Edition

Vulnerability management platforms for small business buyers

Asked as “vulnerability management platform”, and as “vulnerability scanning and management tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
45%
Clear leader
45Intruder09ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus05Action141others

45% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▼−13Since September 2026: 59% → 46%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Intruder held the lead, −13 points on 59%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Intruder45%0%56endorsed leader▼−13Since September 2026: 59% → 46%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.59% → 46%
02ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus9%6%31accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 7% → 10%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 10%
03Tenable Nessus5%32%37criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
04OpenVAS5%50%26criticized challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%
05Rapid7 InsightVM5%54%39criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
06ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management4%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
07Tenable Vulnerability Management4%68%37criticized challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%
08Qualys VMDR4%62%47criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
09NinjaOne2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
10Vicarius vRx2%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management0%10%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Intruder45%
02ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus9%
03Tenable Nessus5%
04OpenVAS5%
05Rapid7 InsightVM5%
06ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management4%
07Tenable Vulnerability Management4%
08Qualys VMDR4%
09NinjaOne2%
10Vicarius vRx2%
11Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Qualys VMDR
62%
29 of 47 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“What to avoid for small B2B ... **Qualys VMDR** and **Rapid7 InsightVM** — excellent tools but designed for mid-market/enterprise scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt
Tenable Vulnerability Management
68%
25 of 37 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“"Users find the high costs of Tenable Vulnerability Management prohibitive, especially for organizations with tight budgets."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Rapid7 InsightVM
54%
21 of 39 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Generally best avoided unless you have 500+ assets and a full-time security engineer. It is considered complex and resource-intensive for small businesses” Mistral Small, negative prompt
OpenVAS
50%
13 of 26 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms like **OpenVAS** (part of the Greenbone suite) are powerful and free, but they come with significant hidden costs in labor and maintenance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1152 links across 197 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Vicarius47 answers · 81 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Orca41 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
36 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · UpGuard36 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G232 answers · 53 citations · 13 models
32 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Intruder25 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Tenable24 answers · 47 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · NinjaOne19 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Motadata19 answers · 19 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Intruder intruder.io45%23127,1008,55749,56243
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus 9%
9%788,100675
Tenable parent site
Tenable Nessus 5%
5%7327,1001,194
Action1 action1.com5%1818,1008718,854$3,80148
Microsoft Defender microsoft.com
Microsoft Defender for Cloud 5%
5%56918,1003,525145,358,109 company$12,455103
OpenVAS openvas.org5%583,6002293,099
Rapid7 rapid7.com
Rapid7 InsightVM 5%
5%16814,800798123,299 company$60930
ESET eset.com
ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management 4%
4%1618,1001,812637,959 company$4,39775
Tenable tenable.com
Tenable Vulnerability Management 4%
4%14827,1001,194187,567 company$9,764621
Qualys VMDR qualys.com4%1623201626,929467

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (orca.security, tenable.com). The first result for “best vulnerability management platform” is surecloud.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best vulnerability management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vulnerability scanning and management tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top vulnerability management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best vulnerability management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a vulnerability management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which vulnerability management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Intruder
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightVM
IntruderHeld
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
One alternativeManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
against: Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
One alternativeMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management
against: OpenVAS
no first choiceagainst: Cisco Vulnerability Management, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Tanium, Tenable Vulnerability Management
GPT-5.4 miniTenable Vulnerability Management
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus
Tenable NessusChanged
One alternativeTenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Nessus
Three alternativesMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
against: Rapid7's broader Exposure Command, Tenable One
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
One alternativeTenable Nessus
against: Qualys VMDR
no first choiceagainst: Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Pentera, Qualys VMDR, RidgeBot, Tenable Vulnerability Management, VulScan
Gemini 3.5 FlashAikido Security
Three alternativesAction1, Intruder, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
IntruderChanged
Four alternativesCrashtest Security, Detectify, Tenable Nessus, UpGuard
Intruder, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Five alternativesAutomox, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Orca Security, SecOps Solution, Wiz
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
Action1, Intruder
Three alternativesAikido Security, OpenVAS, Wazuh
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Action1
Six alternativesAikido Security, Intruder, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, SecPod SanerNow, UpGuard BreachSight, Vicarius vRx
against: Qualys VMDR, Snyk, Tenable.sc
against: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Perplexity SonarAstra Security
Two alternativesIntruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
against: Rapid7 InsightVM
Tenable NessusChanged
One alternativeManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Intruder
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
Three alternativesAstra Security, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus
no first choiceagainst: Burp Suite, CrowdStrike, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Nmap, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tanium, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Grok 4.1 FastIntruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
One alternativeESET Vulnerability & Patch Management
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus
Tenable NessusChanged
Two alternativesIntruder, OpenVAS
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
Intruder
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, NinjaOne
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
OpenVAS
Two alternativesIntruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Five alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Frontline VM, NinjaOne, PDQ, Vicarius vRx
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Mistral SmallIntruder, NinjaOne
Two alternativesAikido Security, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
IntruderChanged
Two alternativesAikido Security, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
against: OpenVAS
NinjaOne Vulnerability Management
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
One alternativeAction1
no first choice
Six alternativesDefectDojo, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Snyk, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Wiz
against: OpenVAS, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
DeepSeek V4 FlashIntruder
Two alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Tenable Nessus
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable One
Rapid7 InsightVMChanged
Three alternativesDrata, Tenable Nessus, Vanta
against: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR
Intruder, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Two alternativesQualys VMDR, Vicarius vRx
against: Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Two alternativesIntruder, OpenVAS
Intruder
Three alternativesQualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Vicarius vRx
against: Tenable Vulnerability Management
against: Forescout, McAfee, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tripwire
Llama 4 MaverickVicarius vRx
Two alternativesIntruder, UpGuard
no first choiceChangedIntruder
Three alternativesSprinto, UpGuard, Vicarius vRx
Intruder
Two alternativesAstra Security, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
no first choiceagainst: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Qwen 3.7 FlashTenable Vulnerability Management
Four alternativesGitHub Advanced Security, Qualys VMDR, StackHawk, Wiz
against: OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
IntruderChanged
One alternativeTenable Vulnerability Management
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Two alternativesCyrisma, Rapid7 InsightVM
against: Qualys VMDR
Intruder
Four alternativesGreenbone Vulnerability Manager, Orca Security, Snyk, Tenable Nessus
against: Qualys VMS
no first choiceagainst: OpenVAS, Qualys Virtual Method Detection and Response
Kimi K2Intruder
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
IntruderHeld
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
Intruder
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
Two alternativesESET PROTECT, OpenVAS
against: Tenable Nessus
Intruder
One alternativeQualys VMDR
against: Orca Security, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
against: AlienVault OSSIM, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXIntruder, Qualys VMDR
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, NinjaOne, Tenable Vulnerability Management
IntruderChanged
Two alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Tenable Nessus
Vicarius vRx
Two alternativesDefectDojo, Intruder
against: Tenable Vulnerability Management
Action1
Four alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Intruder, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, OpenVAS
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus
no first choiceagainst: Tenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Arctic Wolf, Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Sprinto, Tenable Vulnerability Management
MiniMax M2.5ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Qualys VMDR
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightVM, Vicarius vRx
against: Tenable Vulnerability Management
IntruderChanged
Two alternativesAikido Security, OpenVAS
Intruder
Four alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Intruder, OpenVAS
Two alternativesMageni, Tenable Nessus
CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Rapid7 InsightVMagainst: OpenVAS, Tenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Aikido Security, Astra Security, Cyrisma, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
GPT-6 LunaRapid7 InsightVM
Two alternativesMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Nessus
Microsoft Defender for CloudChanged
One alternativeRapid7 InsightVM
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Four alternativesAction1, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
against: OpenVAS
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
One alternativeOpenVAS
against: Tenable Nessus
no first choiceagainst: Cisco Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management, WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management
Muse Glimmer 30BIntruder
Four alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, NinjaOne, Tenable Nessus
IntruderHeld
Two alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
Three alternativesMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management, NinjaOne, Tenable Nessus
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
OpenVAS
Three alternativesIntruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Trivy
no first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:03yes1510 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:41yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:38yes1224 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:02yes192 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:44yes239 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:08yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:44yes2324 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:24yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:32no037 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:48yes1828 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:03yes1415 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:46yes1828 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:17yes310 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:22yes1330 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:47yes97 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:48yes44 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:39yes1221 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:07yes245 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:09yes246 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:58yes127 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:40yes2433 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:42yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:43yes538 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:28yes2527 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:55yes2417 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:57yes2521 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:05yes415 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 13:48yes2429 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:27yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:54yes511 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:51yes1928 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:44yes204 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:17yes217 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:20yes2413 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:48yes2448 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:36yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:54yes528 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:59yes2225 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:09yes2347 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:56yes1119 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:46yes622 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:38yes2440 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:10yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:53yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:25yes2323 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:54yes203 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:45yes2414 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:41yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:08yes2527 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:37yes51 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:37yes1520 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:59yes1417 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:37yes2240 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:29yes1427 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:59yes313 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:43yes1517 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:06no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:49no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:45yes924 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:30yes206 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:56yes179 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:59no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:14yes2340 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:03yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:27no027 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:11yes1936 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:48yes830 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:35yes522 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:25yes512 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:20yes1220 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:50yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:02yes36 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:04yes1521 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:37yes258 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:10yes217 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:17yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:00yes2547 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:45yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:01yes1564 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:40yes2429 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:31yes2330 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:17yes1630 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:26yes630 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:57yes2133 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ESET read as ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management
ManageEngine read as ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Orca read as Orca Security
Qualys read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys (VMDR) read as Qualys VMDR
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 (InsightVM) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 Nexpose read as Rapid7 InsightVM
SecPod read as SecPod SanerNow
Tenable read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Nessus Pro) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Nessus/VM) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Security Center) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable One Vulnerability Management read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Vicarius read as Vicarius vRx
Vicarius (TOPIA) read as Vicarius vRx
Vicarius (vRx / Vulcan) read as Vicarius vRx
Unresolved, counted raw
Crashtest Security
Frontline VM
Greenbone Vulnerability Manager (formerly OpenVAS)
Intruder Vulnerability Scanner
Mageni
Nessus Vulnerability Scanner by Tenable
Nessus from Tenable
OpenVAS Greenbone
Qualys VMS
Qualys Virtual Method Detection and Response (VMDR)
Rapid7's broader Exposure Command
SecOps Solution
Tenable.sc
WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Threat intelAI IT agents →