Vulnerability management platforms · October 2026 Edition
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Intruder
Ten of fourteen models named Rapid7 InsightVM first on the direct prompt; two named Intruder. Rapid7 InsightVM was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Intruder by twelve and Rapid7 InsightVM carries 63 labels and Intruder 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share30%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels6326A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Rapid7 InsightVM reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management · Rapid7 InsightVM vs Qualys VMDR · Rapid7 InsightVM vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the vulnerability management platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Rapid7 InsightVMFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIntruder
Direct102
Paraphrase51
Comparative20
Budget-constrained132 against Rapid7 InsightVM
Scale-constrained101 against Rapid7 InsightVM
Negative009 against Rapid7 InsightVM
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Rapid7 InsightVM and Intruder were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 187 answers naming Rapid7 InsightVM and the 231 naming Intruder. In those answers Intruder took the first choice seventeen times and Rapid7 InsightVM eleven.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Rapid7 InsightVM and Intruder stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | | |
Rapid7 InsightVM Intruder first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Rapid7 InsightVM on the left and Intruder on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Rapid7 InsightVM and Intruder stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Kimi K2Intruder, Rapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Qualys VMDR
Rapid7 InsightVM first, Intruder an alternative
9 of 14 modelsIntruder was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightVM alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Vicarius vRx
GPT-5.4 miniRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Perplexity SonarRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Qualys VMDR, Vicarius vRx
Grok 4.20Rapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Mistral SmallRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, SureCloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashRapid7 InsightVM, Vicarius vRx alternatives: Intruder, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Qwen 3.7 FlashRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
MiniMax M2.5Rapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, Tenable One
Muse Glimmer 30BRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Intruder first, Rapid7 InsightVM not the choice
1 of 14 modelsRapid7 InsightVM was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickIntruder alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Rapid7's Insight platform
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashSecPod SanerNow, Vicarius vRx alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Nucleus Security, Rapid7 InsightVM
GPT-6 LunaTenable Vulnerability Management alternatives: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GLM 4.7 FlashXQualys VMDR alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Intruder leads by thirty-nine points.
Intruder45%#1 of 11Rapid7 InsightVM5%#5 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Rapid7 InsightVM leads at mid-market.
Rapid7 InsightVM30%#1 of 10Intruder11%#3 of 10Enterprise
Rapid7 InsightVM leads by eight points.
Rapid7 InsightVM8%#4 of 9Intruder0%#– of 9What the models said about Rapid7 InsightVM
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget - Full‑featured enterprise tools (Rapid7, Qualys, Tenable.io)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Dropped in Forrester 2024 rankings; doesn't own patching engine/roadmap; prioritization gaps vs. leaders. High costs for extras.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lacks deep vulnerability intelligence, missing Active Directory/Entra ID visibility, limited patching features” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Rapid7 InsightVM offers the best balance of capability, prioritization intelligence, and published pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 InsightVM stands out most often in mid-market contexts for its balance of power, usability, and actionable insights” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 InsightVM is the most frequently recommended vulnerability scanning and management tool for mid-sized B2B companies” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Intruder
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“The best vulnerability management platform for a mid-market B2B company is Intruder, a user-friendly exposure management platform designed for mid-sized businesses.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM vs Qualys VMDRRapid7 InsightVM vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusRapid7 InsightVM vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM vs Vicarius vRxRapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable NessusTenable Vulnerability Management vs IntruderIntruder vs Qualys VMDRIntruder vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusIntruder vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementIntruder vs Vicarius vRxIntruder vs Tenable NessusAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full vuln management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.