Vulnerability management platforms · October 2026 Edition
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Vicarius vRx
Ten of fourteen models named Rapid7 InsightVM first on the direct prompt; two named Vicarius vRx. Rapid7 InsightVM was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Vicarius vRx by eight and Rapid7 InsightVM carries 63 labels and Vicarius vRx 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share30%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels6311A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Rapid7 InsightVM reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management · Rapid7 InsightVM vs Intruder · Rapid7 InsightVM vs Qualys VMDR
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the vulnerability management platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Rapid7 InsightVMFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVicarius vRx
Direct102
Paraphrase50
Comparative20
Budget-constrained102 against Rapid7 InsightVM
Scale-constrained101 against Rapid7 InsightVM
Negative009 against Rapid7 InsightVM
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Rapid7 InsightVM and Vicarius vRx stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Rapid7 InsightVM Vicarius vRx first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Rapid7 InsightVM on the left and Vicarius vRx on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Rapid7 InsightVM and Vicarius vRx stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.DeepSeek V4 FlashRapid7 InsightVM, Vicarius vRx alternatives: Intruder, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Rapid7 InsightVM first, Vicarius vRx an alternative
9 of 14 modelsVicarius vRx was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightVM alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Vicarius vRx
GPT-5.4 miniRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Perplexity SonarRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Qualys VMDR, Vicarius vRx
Grok 4.1 FastRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Mistral SmallRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, SureCloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Kimi K2Intruder, Rapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Qualys VMDR
MiniMax M2.5Rapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, Tenable One
Muse Glimmer 30BRapid7 InsightVM alternatives: Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Vicarius vRx first, Rapid7 InsightVM an alternative
1 of 14 modelsRapid7 InsightVM was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashSecPod SanerNow, Vicarius vRx alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Nucleus Security, Rapid7 InsightVM
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-6 LunaTenable Vulnerability Management alternatives: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 MaverickIntruder alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Rapid7's Insight platform
GLM 4.7 FlashXQualys VMDR alternatives: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Rapid7 InsightVM leads by four points.
Rapid7 InsightVM5%#5 of 11Vicarius vRx2%#10 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Rapid7 InsightVM leads by twenty-six points.
Rapid7 InsightVM30%#1 of 10Vicarius vRx4%#7 of 10Enterprise
Rapid7 InsightVM leads by eight points.
Rapid7 InsightVM8%#4 of 9Vicarius vRx0%#– of 9What the models said about Rapid7 InsightVM
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget - Full‑featured enterprise tools (Rapid7, Qualys, Tenable.io)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Dropped in Forrester 2024 rankings; doesn't own patching engine/roadmap; prioritization gaps vs. leaders. High costs for extras.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lacks deep vulnerability intelligence, missing Active Directory/Entra ID visibility, limited patching features” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Rapid7 InsightVM offers the best balance of capability, prioritization intelligence, and published pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 InsightVM stands out most often in mid-market contexts for its balance of power, usability, and actionable insights” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 InsightVM is the most frequently recommended vulnerability scanning and management tool for mid-sized B2B companies” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Vicarius vRx
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“vRx is highly regarded in the mid-market space. It uses a single agent to perform vulnerability scanning, risk prioritization, and automated patching” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Rapid7 InsightVM or Vicarius vRx are the strongest overall picks.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“described as the strongest fit because of its patchless protection and lower operational overhead” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM vs IntruderRapid7 InsightVM vs Qualys VMDRRapid7 InsightVM vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusRapid7 InsightVM vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable NessusTenable Vulnerability Management vs Vicarius vRxIntruder vs Vicarius vRxQualys VMDR vs Vicarius vRxManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Vicarius vRxMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Vicarius vRxVicarius vRx vs Tenable NessusAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full vuln management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.