AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Identity and access › MFA › Small business › October 2026 Edition

Multi-factor authentication for small business buyers

Asked as “MFA solution”, and as “multi-factor authentication tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 72 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Clear leader
40Cisco Duo29Microsoft Entra ID07Google Workspace 2-Step Verification24others

40% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▼−2Since September 2026: 45% → 43%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Cisco Duo held the lead, −2 points on 45%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Cisco Duo40%3%68endorsed leader▼−2Since September 2026: 45% → 43%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.45% → 43%
02Microsoft Entra ID29%0%50accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 28% → 28%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 28%
03Google Workspace 2-Step Verification Lab in the set7%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 3%
04Okta Verify7%29%41criticized challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 8%
05Microsoft Authenticator4%8%26accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 5%
06JumpCloud Protect1%0%29accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
07Auth01%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Authy0%18%22accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
08Google Authenticator Lab in the set0%14%35accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%
09YubiKey0%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Workspace 2-Step Verification is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models four times of 52. Google Authenticator is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Cisco Duo40%
02Microsoft Entra ID29%
03Google Workspace 2-Step Verification7%
04Okta Verify7%
05Microsoft Authenticator4%
06JumpCloud Protect1%
07Auth01%
08Google Authenticator0%
09YubiKey0%
10Authy0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Okta Verify
29%
12 of 41 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“you should avoid standalone MFA subscriptions (like Okta or CyberArk) which cost \$3–\$10+ per user/month” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Google Authenticator
14%
5 of 35 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“TOTP Apps Without Additional Protections (e.g., Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator in basic mode) ... Risk Level: Medium — Use with caution for admin accounts” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Authy
18%
4 of 22 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Authy is no longer recommended for new deployments.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
RSA SecurID
100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Overly Complex, Legacy Enterprise Systems (e.g., On-Premises PKI or RSA) ... Avoid heavy, complex, on-premises MFA infrastructure.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 940 links across 198 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

43 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · miniOrange32 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Rippling23 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CISA20 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · MojoAuth20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Frontegg20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best mfa solution”, “mfa solution”, “mfa solutions”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Cisco parent site
Cisco Duo 40%
40%198165,00048,352
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Entra ID 29%, Microsoft Authenticator 4%, Microsoft 365 3%
36%4802,240,000403,136
Google Workspace workspace.google.com
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification 7%
7%17368,0007,42240,583,075$2,344
Okta Verify okta.com7%13849,5001,3221,959,740118
JumpCloud Protect jumpcloud.com1%421706108,479$8,612807
Auth0 auth0.com1%23718,100772170,673117
LastPass MFA lastpass.com1%1526001,804,249$1,22053
Duo Mobile1%
JumpCloud Free Tier1%
Microsoft Entra Security Defaults1%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aimultiple.com, miniorange.com, rippling.com). The first result for “best mfa solution” is miniorange.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best MFA solution for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-factor authentication tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top MFA solutions for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best MFA solution for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a MFA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which MFA solutions should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceCisco DuoChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify
Cisco Duo
Three alternativesGoogle Authenticator, LastPass MFA, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco Duo
Four alternativesGoogle Authenticator, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin MFA
no first choiceagainst: Okta Verify, RSA SecurID
GPT-5.4 miniCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeMicrosoft Authenticator
Cisco DuoChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Cisco Duo
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud Identity, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
against: Auth0
Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeCisco Duo
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, YubiKey
Cisco DuoChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID, YubiKey
Cisco Duo
Seven alternatives1Password, Bitwarden, Google Authenticator, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, YubiKey
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft 365
Three alternativesBitwarden, Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator
Cisco Duo
Three alternativesGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Authy, Google Authenticator, RSA SecurID
Perplexity SonarCisco Duo
Four alternativesAuth0, Descope, Microsoft Entra ID, WorkOS
against: Okta Verify
Cisco DuoHeld
Two alternativesFrontegg, LastPass MFA
Cisco Duo
Four alternativesGoogle Authenticator, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin MFA
Cisco Duo
Three alternativesGoogle Authenticator, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastCisco Duo
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Okta Verify
Microsoft Entra IDChanged
Two alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify
against: Authy, Google Authenticator
Cisco Duo
Five alternatives2FAS, Authy, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, privacyIDEA
against: Okta Verify, YubiKey
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Three alternativesForgeRock, Google Authenticator, OneLogin MFA
against: Ping Identity
against: Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, Ping Identity
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, LoginRadius
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyChangedMicrosoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify
Okta Verify
Three alternativesAuthy, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
no first choice
Four alternativesCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, YubiKey
against: RSA SecurID
nothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID
Two alternativesCisco Duo, Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDChanged
One alternativeJumpCloud Protect
against: Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Four alternativesAuthy, Google Authenticator, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, miniOrange
against: Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Four alternativesAuthelia, Authy, Google Authenticator, Keycloak
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
Four alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Authenticator, YubiKey
against: Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceOTPLESS
Two alternativesCisco Duo, miniOrange
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashCisco Duo
Three alternativesGoogle Advanced Protection / 2-Step Verification, LastPass MFA, Microsoft Authenticator
against: Authy, Google Authenticator
Auth0, Cisco DuoChanged
Four alternativesClerk, Frontegg, Google Workspace Identity-Aware Protection, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesAuth0, JumpCloud Protect, miniOrange
Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, YubiKey
against: CyberArk, Okta Verify
Duo Mobile, Okta Verify
Two alternativesAzure AD Premium P1, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
against: YubiKey
nothing named
Kimi K2Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect
against: Okta Verify
Cisco DuoChanged
Three alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Authenticator, miniOrange
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesAuth0, JumpCloud Protect, OneLogin MFA
Cisco Duo, JumpCloud Free Tier
Two alternativesGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Keycloak, privacyIDEA
no first choiceagainst: Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify
GLM 4.7 FlashXCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesGoogle Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify
Cisco DuoChanged
Four alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, MojoAuth, OneLogin MFA
Cisco Duo
Six alternativesAuth0, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, YubiKey
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator
Two alternativesGoogle Authenticator, Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeJumpCloud Protect
against: Okta Verify
against: Authy, LastPass Authenticator, Twilio
MiniMax M2.5LastPass MFA, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDChanged
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify, YubiKey
against: 1Password
Microsoft Authenticator
Four alternativesAuthy, Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
Cisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternatives1Password, LastPass MFA
nothing named
GPT-6 LunaGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeCisco Duo
Microsoft Entra IDChanged
One alternativeCisco Duo
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternativesCisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra Security Defaultsagainst: Cisco DuoMicrosoft Entra IDnothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BCisco Duo
Three alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID
Cisco DuoHeld
Three alternativesJumpCloud MFA, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID Protection MFA
Cisco Duo
Two alternativesJumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
against: Okta Verify
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID
Two alternativesGoogle Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft 365
Five alternatives1Password, Cisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify, YubiKey
nothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:28no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:52yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:02yes820 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:18yes183 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:13yes2216 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:42yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:02yes2034 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:47yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:22yes924 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:21yes2026 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:03yes19179 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:43yes512 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:46yes39 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:30yes2132 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:51no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:51yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:45yes1524 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:26yes203 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:42yes236 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:44yes95 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:20yes2125 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:56yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:35yes534 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:32yes2016 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:16yes1276 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:25yes530 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:38yes313 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 13:16yes2227 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:22yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:15yes47 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:53yes1626 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:52yes215 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:28yes228 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:48yes1623 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:30yes2240 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:52yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:18yes2047 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:36yes1826 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:04yes1989 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:03yes718 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:13yes615 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:25yes1224 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:42yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:40yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:07yes1225 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:54yes233 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:27yes186 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:31yes523 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:10yes2427 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:39yes51 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:36no040 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:55yes1316 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:12yes10227 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:18no09 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:39yes415 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:13yes1418 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:11no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:44no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:08yes1229 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:48yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:50yes149 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:25no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:49yes1735 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:28yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:18no022 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:41yes916 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:47yes920 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:29yes523 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:12yes210 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:47no010 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:58yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:00no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:30yes1524 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:08yes195 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:14yes239 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:49yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:01yes2263 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:42yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:59yes524 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:09yes2528 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:38yes25105 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:34yes942 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:37yes412 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:52yes1429 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google 2-Step Verification read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
Google 2-Step Verification (2SV) read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
Google Workspace read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
JumpCloud read as JumpCloud Protect
LastPass read as LastPass MFA
LastPass Business read as LastPass MFA
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Verify
Okta (and Auth0 by Okta) read as Okta Verify
Okta Adaptive MFA read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
OneLogin read as OneLogin MFA
RSA read as RSA SecurID
Unresolved, counted raw
2FAS
Azure AD Premium P1
Cisco Duo starter plans
Duo Mobile
FIDO/WebAuthn-based authentication
Google Advanced Protection / 2-Step Verification (for Google Workspace)
Google Workspace Identity-Aware Protection
Google's built-in MFA
JumpCloud Free Tier
LastPass Authenticator
Manageengine Adselfservice
Microsoft Authenticator App
Microsoft Entra ID Protection MFA
Microsoft Entra Security Defaults
OTPLESS
Protectimus
Tecalis Authentication
ThomaSoft / Zight
Titan
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Identity verificationNHI management →