AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Identity and access › MFA › Okta Verify vs Microsoft Authenticator
Multi-factor authentication · October 2026 Edition

Okta Verify vs Microsoft Authenticator

Two of fourteen models named Okta Verify first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft Authenticator. Okta Verify was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Microsoft Authenticator by ten and Okta Verify carries 57 labels and Microsoft Authenticator 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Okta Verify

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Microsoft Authenticator

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%19%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5721A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Okta Verify reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Entra ID was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Cisco Duo vs Okta Verify · Cisco Duo vs Microsoft Authenticator · Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Verify

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the multi-factor authentication page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Okta VerifyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Authenticator
Direct202 against Okta Verify
Paraphrase401 against Okta Verify
Comparative30
Budget-constrained012 against Okta Verify · 1 against Microsoft Authenticator
Scale-constrained20
Negative003 against Okta Verify · 3 against Microsoft Authenticator
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Okta Verify and Microsoft Authenticator were named in the same answer thirty-three times, of the 163 answers naming Okta Verify and the 52 naming Microsoft Authenticator. In those answers Microsoft Authenticator took the first choice three times and Okta Verify six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Okta Verify and Microsoft Authenticator stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Okta Verify Microsoft Authenticator first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Okta Verify on the left and Microsoft Authenticator on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Okta Verify and Microsoft Authenticator stood in it.

Okta Verify first, Microsoft Authenticator not the choice

2 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Authenticator was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Mistral SmallCisco Duo, Okta Verify alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra ID alternatives: Cisco Duo, Okta Verify
Gemini 3.5 FlashCisco Duo alternatives: JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
Perplexity SonarCisco Duo alternatives: Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA, WorkOS
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID alternatives: Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, YubiKey
Kimi K2Cisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
GLM 4.7 FlashXCisco Duo alternatives: JumpCloud MFA, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA
MiniMax M2.5Cisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra ID alternatives: Cisco Duo, Okta Verify
Muse Glimmer 30BCisco Duo alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, PingOne MFA, SafeNet Trusted Access, SecureAuth Arculix

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.1 FastCisco Duo alternatives: JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID
DeepSeek V4 FlashCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID alternatives: JumpCloud MFA
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Okta Verify leads by three points.
Okta Verify7%#4 of 10
Microsoft Authenticator4%#5 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Okta Verify leads by twelve points.
Okta Verify13%#3 of 11
Microsoft Authenticator2%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Okta Verify leads by thirty points.
Okta Verify33%#2 of 6
Microsoft Authenticator3%#– of 6
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Okta Verify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“While many popular commercial MFA apps (Okta, Microsoft Auth, Duo) offer push notifications where you click "Approve," this method has evolved into a vulnerability known as MFA Fatigue” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Duo and Okta are established options, though their pricing is typically quote-based rather than simple low-cost self-serve pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Caution advised due to: - Multiple security breaches (2022 via third-party vendor, 2023 support system compromise)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Okta Adaptive MFA - Starts at $2 per user per month... Suitable for medium-sized enterprises and large corporations” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Enterprise SSO + MFA | Okta | Unified identity platform with SSO, lifecycle, governance, and MFA.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Okta or Microsoft Entra ID MFA are solid starting points” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Microsoft Authenticator

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Only use push notification systems (like Microsoft Authenticator or Duo) if they are configured to require Number Matching” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“These aren't full enterprise MFA solutions on their own ... They lack central management, enforcement, or reporting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“TOTP Authenticator Apps (Google Authenticator, Authy, Microsoft Authenticator) ... are phishable.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“start with Microsoft Authenticator (if using M365) or Duo Free — both offer solid security with minimal cost” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Microsoft\u2019s own guidance highlights Authenticator, FIDO2 security keys/passkeys, certificate-based auth, and Windows Hello for Business” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · alternative
“Using apps like Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, or Authy is completely free” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.