Every category where a model named JumpCloud Protect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Multi-factor authentication	Identity and access	0%	57 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JumpCloud Protect yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JumpCloud Protect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JumpCloud Protect, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JumpCloud Protect was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cisco Duo12 of 129Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID9 of 123Not in the top three

Okta7 of 120Not in the top three

Google Authenticator3 of 120Not in the top three

Auth02 of 120Not in the top three

LastPass MFA2 of 120Not in the top three

Microsoft Authenticator2 of 120Not in the top three

Ping Identity2 of 120Not in the top three

YubiKey2 of 120Not in the top three

1Password1 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JumpCloud Protect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named JumpCloud Protect and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com12

techrepublic.com10

encomputers.com8

rippling.com7

duo.com6

okta.com6

cofes.com5

miniorange.com5

securityboulevard.com5

g2.com4

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming JumpCloud Protect came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-multi-factor-authentication-mfa-12

techrepublic.com/article/best-multi-factor-authentication-solutions10

encomputers.com/2024/05/best-multi-factor-authentication-small-businesses8

rippling.com/blog/mfa-providers7

cofes.com/mfa-solutions5

miniorange.com/blog/mfa-providers5

securityboulevard.com/2025/12/10-best-multi-factor-authentication-tools-20255

duo.com/solutions/small-to-medium-business4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JumpCloud Protect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JumpCloud Protect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jumpcloud.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.