Multi-factor authentication for enterprise buyers
Asked as “MFA solution”, and as “multi-factor authentication tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 61 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41Microsoft Entra ID33Okta Verify16Cisco Duo10others
41% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026=heldSince September 2026: 40% → 40%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Microsoft Entra ID held the lead, ±0 points on 40%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cisco Duo40%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 45% → 43%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketCisco Duo47%Clear leader▲+5Since September 2026: 43% → 48%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Microsoft Entra ID41%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 40% → 40%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Cisco Duo40%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 45% → 43%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketCisco Duo47%Clear leader▲+5Since September 2026: 43% → 48%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID41%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 40% → 40%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Microsoft Entra ID41%0%60endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 40% → 40%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.40% → 40%
Microsoft Entra ID41%0%60endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 40% → 40%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.40% → 40%02
Okta Verify33%12%64endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 26% → 35%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.26% → 35%
Okta Verify33%12%64endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 26% → 35%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.26% → 35%03Cisco Duo16%3%58accepted challenger▼−15Since September 2026: 30% → 15%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.30% → 15%
Cisco Duo16%3%58accepted challenger▼−15Since September 2026: 30% → 15%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.30% → 15%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
06
RSA SecurID0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
RSA SecurID0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%05
Ping Identity0%7%29accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Ping Identity0%7%29accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%04
YubiKey0%0%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
YubiKey0%0%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Entra ID41%
Microsoft Entra ID41%02Okta Verify33%
Okta Verify33%03Cisco Duo16%
Cisco Duo16%04YubiKey0%
YubiKey0%05Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%06RSA SecurID0%
RSA SecurID0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Google Authenticator86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Consumer-Grade MFA Apps Used for Enterprise (e.g., Google Authenticator, Authy as primary) ... Not suitable as a core enterprise solution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Okta Verify12%
8 of 64 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid for Predictable Costs: **Okta** — While feature-rich, pricing escalates quickly” Kimi K2, budget prompt
RSA SecurID36%
4 of 11 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Traditional physical tokens that generate a rotating 6-digit passcode (like legacy RSA SecurID systems) are heavily vulnerable to **Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing**” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Auth050%
3 of 6 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Unlike MAU (monthly active user)-based models (like Auth0 or some customer IAM platforms)... avoid consumption-based or MAU-based pricing models entirely” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1011 links across 229 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
31 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Frontegg25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Rippling24 answers · 25 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow24 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · MojoAuth21 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · miniOrange20 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · WorkOS19 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ManageEngine19 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 8 models
23 answers · 7 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best mfa solution”, “mfa solution”, “mfa solutions”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 41%, Microsoft Authenticator 3%, Microsoft Entra External ID 0% | 44% | 480 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Okta Verify okta.com | 33% | 138 | 49,500 | 1,322 | 1,959,740 | 118 | ||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Duo 16%, Cisco Secure Access 0% | 16% | 198 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| OneLogin MFA onelogin.com | 2% | 24 | 10 | 0 | 315,519 | 0 | 2 | |
| WorkOS workos.com | 2% | 99 | 12,100 | 107 | 33,478 | 75 | ||
| Entra | 2% | |||||||
| Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) with MFA | 2% | |||||||
| YubiKey yubico.com | 0% | 64 | 49,500 | 2,536 | 97,363 | 32 | ||
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 0%, Ping Identity MFA 0% | 0% | 251 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| IBM parent site IBM Verify 0% | 0% | 79 | 201,000 | 34,098 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aimultiple.com, miniorange.com, rippling.com). The first result for “best mfa solution” is miniorange.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best MFA solution for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-factor authentication tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade MFA solutions and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best MFA solution for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a MFA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which MFA solutions should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceMicrosoft Entra ID (Azure AD) with MFAChangedMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verifyno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cisco Duo, Google Cloud Identity, Okta VerifyFour alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, YubiKeyOne alternative
Cisco Secure AccessGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDChangedno first choiceCisco Duoagainst: Auth0, Okta Verifyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cisco Duo, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Cisco DuoFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA, Ping IdentityGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, WorkOSagainst: Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyChangedMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, RSA SecurID
Three alternatives
Auth0, Cisco Duo, ClerkOne alternative
Cisco DuoFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, Silverfort, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Yubico YubiEnterprise SubscriptionPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Entra IDOkta VerifyChangedMicrosoft Entra IDCisco Duoagainst: Okta Verifyno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Frontegg, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, Stytch, WorkOSTwo alternatives
IBM Verify, Ping Identity MFASeven alternatives
Cisco Duo, IBM Verify, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, RSA SecurID Access, Silverfort, Thales SafeNet Trusted AccessOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDGrok 4.1 FastOkta VerifyCisco DuoChangedno first choiceCisco Duoagainst: Auth0, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA, Ping IdentityCisco Duo, Okta Verifyagainst: Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Okta Verify
Three alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyFour alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDFour alternatives
IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin MFA, Ping IdentityMistral SmallOkta VerifyOkta VerifyHeldCisco DuoMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta VerifyMicrosoft Authenticator, Okta Verifyagainst: Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Four alternatives
Auth0, Cisco Duo, Clerk, Microsoft Entra IDTwo alternatives
Ping Identity, YubiEnterpriseSix alternatives
HYPR, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, RSA SecurID, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, YubiKeyOne alternative
YubiKeyDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyMicrosoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Auth0, Okta Verify, RSA ID Plus, SSOJetMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Authy, Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Okta Verify
Three alternatives
Cisco Duo, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifySix alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, RSA ID Plus, RSA SecurID, YubiKeyOne alternative
Cisco DuoThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, YubiKeyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyOkta VerifyChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Verifynothing named
Three alternatives
Cisco Duo, Ping Identity, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDFour alternatives
Cisco Duo, CyberArk, Google Workspace 2-Step Verification, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, RSA SecurityThree alternatives
Feitian, Ping Identity, SentinelOneKimi K2Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDChangedOkta Verifyagainst: RSA SecurIDMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Authy, Google Authenticator
Three alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, RipplingTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyFour alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, YubiKeyThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, YubiKey as a ServiceThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, Ping IdentityGLM 4.7 FlashXOkta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDChangedno first choiceCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin MFAThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, SilverfortSeven alternatives
Cisco Duo, Entrust, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, YubiKeyOne alternative
JumpCloud ProtectMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyCisco Duo, Okta VerifyChangedCisco DuoCisco Duo, OneLogin MFAno first choiceagainst: Google Authenticator, RSA SecurID
Two alternatives
Ping Identity, Thales SafeNet Trusted AccessTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, RipplingThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDChangedno first choiceCisco Duo, Entrano first choicenothing named
One alternative
Cisco DuoTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, RSA ID PlusMuse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Entra IDOkta VerifyChangedCisco Duo, Cisco Secure Accessagainst: RSA ID Plus, RSA SecurIDCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, Clerk, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Okta VerifyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity MFAOne alternative
Okta VerifyThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:10 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:00 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:16 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:48 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:01 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:07 | yes | 15 | 77 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 24 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 21 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:28 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:04 | yes | 21 | 82 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:56 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:54 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:06 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 16 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:28 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:06 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:41 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 25 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 21 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:16 | no | 0 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google Workspace (BeyondCorp Zero Trust) read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
JumpCloud read as JumpCloud Protect
Okta read as Okta Verify
Okta Adaptive MFA read as Okta Verify
Okta Adaptive MFA (Workforce Identity Cloud) read as Okta Verify
Okta Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
Okta MFA read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud (Adaptive MFA) read as Okta Verify
OneLogin read as OneLogin MFA
OneLogin by One Identity read as OneLogin MFA
RSA read as RSA SecurID
Unresolved, counted raw
AuthX
Duo with verified push
FIDO2 security keys
IAM Identity Center
Mac Touch ID/Face ID
Microsoft Authenticator with number match
Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) with MFA
RSA ID Plus E3
RSA SecurID Access
Symantec VIP
Touch ID
YubiKey as a Service (Yubico)
Yubico YubiEnterprise Subscription
platform passkeys (Windows Hello, Apple Face ID)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.