IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Vicarius vRx · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Vicarius vRx

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Vicarius vRx was named 2 times in Vuln management, where Rapid7 InsightVM led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In vuln management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Vicarius vRx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Vulnerability management platformsSecurity operations2%8 of 800%2under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vicarius vRx yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vicarius vRx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Vicarius vRx is built specifically to bridge the gap between security (finding problems) and IT operations (fixing them)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
“a strong fit for mixed Windows/Linux, cloud and on-prem workloads, and smaller security teams” Perplexity Sonar · Vuln management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vicarius vRx, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vicarius vRx was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Intruder3 of 41Not in the top three
Qualys3 of 40Not in the top three
Rapid72 of 40Not in the top three
Tenable2 of 40Not in the top three
Aikido Security1 of 41Not in the top three
Rapid7 InsightVM1 of 41Not in the top three
Action11 of 40Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management1 of 40Not in the top three
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus1 of 40Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vicarius vRx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 4 answers that named Vicarius vRx and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vicarius vRx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vicarius vRx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vicarius.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack