Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 10 of 76
1 category · RankedVicarius vRx
25Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Vuln management for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Vicarius vRx →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 82
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 77
4%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise20 of 68
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In vuln management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Vicarius vRx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 4% | 7 of 77 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Vicarius vRx held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Vuln management · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 74
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 of 62, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vuln management | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 7 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Vicarius vRx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Vicarius vRx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels3
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“vRx is highly regarded in the mid-market space. It uses a single agent to perform vulnerability scanning, risk prioritization, and automated patching” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Rapid7 InsightVM or Vicarius vRx are the strongest overall picks.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
“described as the strongest fit because of its patchless protection and lower operational overhead” Perplexity Sonar · Vuln management · direct prompt · alternative
“Look for platforms built from the ground up for multi-tenancy (like Vicarius or Flamingo” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vuln management · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Vicarius vRx, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vicarius vRx was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Vicarius vRx, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vicarius vRx was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vicarius vRx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Vicarius vRx and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vicarius.ioYour site25
techrepublic.com14
motadata.com11
orca.security11
upguard.com9
axis-intelligence.com8
sprinto.com8
comparitech.com7
securityboulevard.com7
pdq.com6
Eighty-one of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Vicarius vRx came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
vicarius.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Vicarius vRx takes 4% of first choices and Rapid7 InsightVM takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
vicarius.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Vicarius vRx takes 4% of first choices and Rapid7 InsightVM takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “vulnerability management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “vulnerability management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“vicarius vrx”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,017 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,665 · 51 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,520
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 77 in vuln management
Segment leader
30%
Rapid7 InsightVM
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on vicarius.io
913
subdomains included
Content
479
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
20 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 390 | 0 | 2023-07-19 | Patching, Vuln management | |
| Comparison | 25 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 25 | undated | Patching | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 24 | undated | Patching | ||
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | Vuln management |
Most recent
- 2023-07-19Whats in a name blog
- 2022-06-21Our path to product led blog
- 2022-06-20Cisanalysis june 20 2022 blog
- 2022-06-20Vicarius and advent one partner to expand apac operations blog
- 2022-06-16Crowdsourcing utilizing humanitys greatest asset blog
- 2022-06-14The good news and bad news about 0 day attacks blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page vicarius.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name patching (28); 9 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Vicarius vRx
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Vicarius vRx; a claim can dispute any of them.
Vicarius 6Vicarius (vRx) 1
Follow Vicarius vRx
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Vicarius vRx is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Vicarius vRx is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Remediation-first Exposure Assessment Platform with agentic AI that closes gaps automatically.
- For
- CISO & security leadership; SecOps & vulnerability analysts; GRC & compliance teams
- Price stated
- Pricing is tailored to your unique needs. Submit your request and our team will reach out as quickly as possible. vicarius.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start your free demo! vicarius.io
- Customers named
- Jamaica Broilers GroupCharter School AssociatesEL AL AirlinesAdama
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Vicarius vRx's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: vicarius.io, vicarius.io/pricing, vicarius.io/features/compliance, vicarius.io/features/reports, vicarius.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vicarius vRx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vicarius vRx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Vicarius vRx by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Vicarius vRx is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Vicarius vRx, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.