Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 of 76, unchanged
ESET · 1 category · RankedESET Vulnerability & Patch Management
16Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Vuln management for small business buyers
Rank 21 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 82
4%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market21 of 77
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In vuln management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 21 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Vuln management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 20 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 21 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tailored for SMEs; automates scanning/patching for thousands of apps.” Grok 4.20 · Vuln management · budget prompt · alternative
“More affordable for smaller environments” MiniMax M2.5 · Vuln management · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
techrepublic.com15
vicarius.io14
motadata.com9
securityboulevard.com9
orca.security8
axis-intelligence.com7
comparitech.com7
ninjaone.com7
en.softonic.com6
upguard.com6
Eighty-eight of the eighty-eight domain citations in answers naming ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
eset.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management takes 0% of first choices and Rapid7 InsightVM takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
eset.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management takes 0% of first choices and Rapid7 InsightVM takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “vulnerability management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “vulnerability management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“eset vulnerability & patch management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- eset.com shared with ESET's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 637,959 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 26,448 · 2,085 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 49,182
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $4,397 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 77 in vuln management
Segment leader
30%
Rapid7 InsightVM
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
ESET Vulnerability and Patch Management 2
Follow ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ESET is the company behind ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management.ShowHide
The company
ESET is the company behind ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Protezione avanzata per i sistemi operativi Windows, Linux e macOS e migliaia di applicazioni di terze parti, gestita tramite la nostra piattaforma unificata.
- Price stated
- 426,39€ IVA Inclusa eset.com/it/aziende/vulnerability-patch-management
- Starting price
- 426,39€ eset.com/it/aziende/vulnerability-patch-management
- Free plan or trial
- Pruebe antes de comprar eset.com/uy/empresas/vulnerability-patch-management
- Certifications
- FedRAMPNIS2
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: eset.com/it/aziende/vulnerability-patch-management, eset.com/uy/empresas/vulnerability-patch-management, eset.com/pl/business/vulnerability-patch-management, eset.com/sv/empresas/vulnerability-patch-management, eset.com/ni/empresas/vulnerability-patch-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.