Third-party risk management for small business buyers
Asked as “third-party risk management platform”, and as “vendor risk assessment tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · Vanta 32%
39UpGuard32Vanta03SecurityScorecard25others
39% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−9Since September 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.UpGuard held the lead, −9 points on 44%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
UpGuard39%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketUpGuard55%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 53% → 51%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
ProcessUnity19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management (20%) replaces ProcessUnity (25% then, 15% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →
UpGuard39%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketUpGuard55%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 53% → 51%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseProcessUnity19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management (20%) replaces ProcessUnity (25% then, 15% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01UpGuard39%3%61endorsed leader▼−9Since September 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.44% → 35%
UpGuard39%3%61endorsed leader▼−9Since September 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.44% → 35%02
Vanta32%11%62endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 26% → 35%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.26% → 35%
Vanta32%11%62endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 26% → 35%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.26% → 35%03
SecurityScorecard3%28%29criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
SecurityScorecard3%28%29criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%04
Secureframe2%4%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Secureframe2%4%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%05
Whistic2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Whistic2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
Creditsafe2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Creditsafe2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%07
Bitsight2%70%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Bitsight2%70%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%89%28criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%89%28criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08ProcessUnity0%78%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ProcessUnity0%78%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
UpGuard vs PanoraysUpGuard vs DrataUpGuard vs LogicGateVanta vs PrevalentVanta vs ProcessUnityVanta vs PanoraysVanta vs DrataVanta vs LogicGatePrevalent vs ProcessUnityPrevalent vs PanoraysPrevalent vs DrataPrevalent vs LogicGateProcessUnity vs PanoraysProcessUnity vs DrataProcessUnity vs LogicGatePanorays vs DrataPanorays vs LogicGateDrata vs LogicGate
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01UpGuard39%
UpGuard39%02Vanta32%
Vanta32%03SecurityScorecard3%
SecurityScorecard3%04Secureframe2%
Secureframe2%05Whistic2%
Whistic2%06Creditsafe2%
Creditsafe2%07Bitsight2%
Bitsight2%08ProcessUnity0%
ProcessUnity0%09OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management89%
25 of 28 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“"small businesses should be cautious about or avoid the following third-party risk management (TPRM) platforms... OneTrust - Issues: Steep learning curve, complex and opaque pricing"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Bitsight70%
14 of 20 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Considered overkill for small teams ... poor customer service and inaccurate data triggering false positives” Mistral Small, negative prompt
ProcessUnity78%
14 of 18 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“you generally want to avoid the enterprise giants (like OneTrust or ProcessUnity) due to their high implementation costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
MetricStream100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“legacy Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) giants ... overkill for managing a small vendor portfolio” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1040 links across 180 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · UpGuard57 answers · 112 citations · 14 models
vendor site · G245 answers · 68 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G239 answers · 40 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Mitratech30 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Vanta29 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Enzuzo29 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Panorays25 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SmartSuite22 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FitGap18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ComplyJet17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 8 models
28 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UpGuard upguard.com | 39% | 192 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 | 3 |
| Vanta vanta.com | 32% | 500 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | |
| SecurityScorecard securityscorecard.com | 3% | 111 | 2,400 | 118 | 151,385 | 9 | 7 |
| Secureframe secureframe.com | 2% | 232 | 2,400 | 39 | 45,014 | 27 | |
| Whistic whistic.com | 2% | 25 | 49,500 | 14 | 15,430 | 16 | |
| Creditsafe creditsafe.com | 2% | 11 | 4,400 | 70 | 59,141 | 21 | |
| Venminder venminder.com | 2% | 46 | 1,900 | 14 | 4,956 | 4 | |
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 2% | 234 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 | |
| StandardFusion standardfusion.com | 2% | 23 | 90 | 5 | 17 | 0 | |
| ComplyJet complyjet.com | 2% | 38 | 90 | 0 | 2,025 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (panorays.com, upguard.com). The first result for “best third-party risk management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor risk assessment tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top third-party risk management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a third-party risk management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which third-party risk management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5VantaCreditsafe, VantaChangedUpGuardVantano first choiceagainst: AuditBoard, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Vanta
Three alternatives
Onspring, Secureframe, UpGuardTwo alternatives
UpGuard, VenminderThree alternatives
Secureframe, Vanta, VenminderThree alternatives
Enzuzo, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, OnspringGPT-5.4 miniVantaUpGuardChangedHyperComply, SecurityScorecardSecureframe, UpGuardagainst: Vantano first choiceagainst: 3rdRisk, Aravo, IBM OpenPages, NAVEX One, Risk Ledger, SAFE, Vanta
Three alternatives
Creditsafe, D&B Risk Analytics, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Vanta, WhisticFour alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk, Prevalent, RiskRecon, WhisticGemini 3.5 FlashVantaagainst: Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnitySprinto, VantaChangedagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityUpGuard, VantaLT-VRMagainst: Aravo, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardagainst: Archer, Riskonnectagainst: Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Four alternatives
Drata, Risk Ledger, Sprinto, UpGuardFour alternatives
Conveyor, SafeBase, Skypher, UpGuardThree alternatives
Drata, Risk Ledger, WhisticSeven alternatives
SecurityScorecard, SimpleRisk, Sprinto, ThirdProof, UpGuard, Vanta, Wing SecurityThree alternatives
Drata, Vanta, WhisticPerplexity SonarVantaagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementVantaHeldagainst: RiskonnectUpGuardagainst: Diligent One, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ProcessUnity, UpGuardOne alternative
UpGuardFive alternatives
Creditsafe, Panorays, RiskRate/NAVEX, Secureframe, VantaThree alternatives
Creditsafe, Secureframe, VantaGrok 4.1 FastUpGuardUpGuardHeldagainst: VantaUpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityUpGuardagainst: Diligent One, SecurityScorecardBitsight, UpGuard, Vantaagainst: MetricStream, ProcessUnityagainst: Bitsight, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard
Three alternatives
Secureframe, Vanta, VenminderTwo alternatives
StandardFusion, Whistic AssessTwo alternatives
Secureframe, VantaTwo alternatives
Secureframe, VantaMistral SmallUpGuard, VantaVantaChangedVantaStandardFusion, UpGuardagainst: Vantano first choiceagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, Prevalent, UpGuardThree alternatives
Creditsafe, Secureframe, StandardFusionOne alternative
CreditsafeDeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuardUpGuardHeldagainst: SecurityScorecardUpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardagainst: Bitsight, Hyperproof, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecardComplyJet, Vantaagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Vanta
Three alternatives
ComplyJet, Secureframe, VantaTwo alternatives
Cyber Sierra, WhisticThree alternatives
Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, VantaTwo alternatives
Sprinto, VantaOne alternative
UpGuardLlama 4 MaverickVantaBold MatrixChangedno first choiceVantano first choiceagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity
Two alternatives
Risk Ledger, UpGuardTwo alternatives
UpGuard, VantaQwen 3.7 FlashSecurityScorecardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementVantaChangedUpGuardConvercentagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityno first choiceagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Drata, IBM OpenPages, Integrisys, LogicGate, MetricStream, RiskRecon, Secureframe, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, Vanta
Two alternatives
UpGuard, VantaOne alternative
ComplyJetFive alternatives
Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, Vanta, Whistic, osapiensFour alternatives
Drata, Smartsheet, Vanta, monday serviceKimi K2VenminderUpGuardChangedagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, VenminderUpGuardVendorAuditlyagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management, UpGuardno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, SAP Ariba, SecurityScorecard
Four alternatives
Panorays, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, VantaThree alternatives
ComplyJet, Panorays, SecurityScorecardTwo alternatives
SecurityScorecard, VenminderTwo alternatives
Secureframe, VantaGLM 4.7 FlashXSecurityScorecard, ThirdProofGatekeeperChangedno first choiceagainst: PrevalentUpGuardagainst: Larkno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
UpGuard, VantaThree alternatives
Mitti, UpGuard, VantaSix alternatives
Bitsight, Panorays, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, Vanta, WhisticOne alternative
SecurityScorecardMiniMax M2.5UpGuard, VantaUpGuard, VantaHeldUpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityUpGuardagainst: StandardFusionVantaagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
One alternative
PanoraysThree alternatives
Creditsafe, Secureframe, VantaThree alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SAFE Security, SecurityScorecardGPT-6 LunaWhisticagainst: UpGuardConveyorChangedDrata, Secureframe, Vantaagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardno first choiceagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow TPRM
One alternative
VantaOne alternative
VantaTwo alternatives
UpGuard, WhisticOne alternative
VendorRiskMuse Glimmer 30BUpGuardUpGuardHeldUpGuard, Vantaagainst: PrevalentUpGuard, VantaUpGuardagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Diligent One, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity
Two alternatives
Secureframe, VantaOne alternative
VantaTwo alternatives
Secureframe, StandardFusionThree alternatives
Lark, Secureframe, SmartSuiteTwo alternatives
SecurityScorecard, VantaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 6 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 21 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:44 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 25 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 16 | 90 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 0 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 26 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 11 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:32 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 21 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:22 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 21 | 74 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:31 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:27 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:57 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:46 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:58 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 18 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:42 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:49 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:08 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:49 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:35 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
OneTrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
Onetrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow (GRC Module) read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Bold Matrix
Convercent
D&B Risk Analytics
Google Forms/Spreadsheets
HyperComply
Integrisys
Nudgesecurity
OneTrust Third-Party Risk
RiskRate/NAVEX
Skypher
VendorAuditly
VendorRisk
Whistic Assess
osapiens
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.