Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 17 of 69
2 categories · RankedWhistic
32Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in TPRM for small business buyers
Rank 17 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Whistic →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 71
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market17 of 87
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 72
6%5 labels
under the label threshold
In tprm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Whistic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 17 of 87 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 47 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Whistic held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · TPRM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 17 of 82
Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 51 → 5 of 68
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 17 of 87 |
| GRC | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 75, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Whistic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Whistic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Whistic if your team's biggest burden is collecting and reviewing vendor evidence and questionnaires” GPT-6 Luna · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“good for security questionnaire exchange and vendor due diligence, especially for B2B SaaS environments” GPT-5.4 mini · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“worth a look if collecting and reviewing vendor evidence and questionnaires is your main bottleneck” GPT-6 Luna · TPRM · direct prompt · alternative
“Panorays/Whistic are favored when speed to first defensible assessment is the priority” Muse Glimmer 30B · TPRM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Whistic, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whistic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Whistic, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whistic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Whistic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 32 answers that named Whistic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
upguard.com22
vanta.com12
whistic.comYour site10
g2.com9
learn.g2.com8
mitratech.com8
panorays.com8
reddit.com7
riskledger.com7
atlassystems.com6
Eighty-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Whistic came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
whistic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Whistic takes 0% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
whistic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Whistic takes 0% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “third-party risk management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “third-party risk management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 49,500 a month (“whistic”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 14 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,430 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 163 · 14 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 829
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 87 in TPRM
Segment leader
55%
UpGuard
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 32 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on whistic.com
361
subdomains included
Content
318
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 217 | undated | TPRM, CSPM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 51 | undated | TPRM | ||
| News or press | 16 | undated | TPRM | ||
| Report or ebook | 15 | undated | TPRM | ||
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | TPRM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | TPRM, GRC |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page whistic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Whistic
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Whistic; a claim can dispute any of them.
Whistic (now TrustCloud) 1
Follow Whistic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Whistic is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Whistic is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Agentic Risk Operations Platform
- For
- security and risk teams
- Price stated
- $ whistic.com
- Free plan or trial
- Create a Free Profile whistic.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001ISO 42001SOC 2CSA STAR Level 1TX RAMPSOC2ISOCSA STAR Registry
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What Whistic's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: whistic.com, whistic.com/pricing, trust.whistic.com, whistic.com/customers, whistic.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Whistic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Whistic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Whistic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Whistic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Whistic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.