Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 69 → 68 of 69
2 categories · RankedProcessUnity
95Judge labels
12First choices
27Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in TPRM for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 24% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ProcessUnity →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business70 of 71
0%18 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market4 of 87
4%29 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 72
19%46 labels
accepted challenger
In tprm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ProcessUnity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 4% | 4 of 87 | 24% | 29 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SaaS security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 76 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30% |
Movement
Since September 2026, ProcessUnity held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · TPRM · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 4 of 82
Enterprise▼−10Since September 2026: 25% → 15%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 25% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 1 → 2 of 68
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPRM | 2% | 5% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 4 of 87 |
| SSPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ProcessUnity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ProcessUnity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels4
Paraphrase18 labels5
Comparative23 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels1
Scale-constrained10 labels2
Negative19 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ProcessUnity - Named a Leader in Forrester Wave TPRM Q1 2024, with highest customer feedback scores” MiniMax M2.5 · TPRM · scale prompt · first choice
“the best third-party risk management (TPRM) platform is usually ProcessUnity” GPT-5.4 mini · TPRM · direct prompt · first choice
“For a specialist TPRM workflow, start with ProcessUnity and Prevalent.” GPT-6 Luna · TPRM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Need a centralized vendor-risk program across the enterprise: OneTrust, ProcessUnity, Archer, MetricStream” GPT-5.4 mini · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Abysmal performance with 10-20 minute wait times and timeouts” Kimi K2 · TPRM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some platforms (like OneTrust or ProcessUnity) charge for setup services, which can double your first-year cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Users note lengthy implementation timelines and configuration challenges, though the platform is feature-rich.” MiniMax M2.5 · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise-heavy options like OneTrust or ProcessUnity often overkill with complexity and cost ($50K+/year)” Grok 4.20 · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProcessUnity, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProcessUnity was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProcessUnity, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProcessUnity was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProcessUnity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 91 of the 95 answers that named ProcessUnity and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
upguard.com64
bitsight.com45
vanta.com42
mitratech.com39
riskledger.com37
learn.g2.com34
coruzant.com26
g2.com26
gartner.com25
sprinto.com25
363 of the 363 domain citations in answers naming ProcessUnity came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
processunity.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ProcessUnity takes 4% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
processunity.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ProcessUnity takes 4% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “third-party risk management platform”
3
Position for “third-party risk management platforms”
2
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“processunity”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 19 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,672 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 635 · 27 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,162
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 4 of 87 in TPRM
Segment leader
55%
UpGuard
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 95 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 91 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on processunity.com
1,096
subdomains included
Content
802
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 24
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 520 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 113 | 2 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 93 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 25 | undated | |||
| Case study | 23 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 7 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Resources whitepapers meet the processunity tprm ai agents report or ebook
- 2026-09-24What is a vendor risk rating glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-22Ss2 21 ps26 2 dora one tprm programme blog
- 2026-09-21Pra fca ss2 21 ps26 2 march 2027 requirements blog
- 2026-09-18Webinar riskrecon risk in real time replay webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-07Ai agents third party risk management blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- reported May 2026UNITE 2026: LondonLondon · hosted
- reported May 2026UNITE 2026: Fort LauderdaleFort Lauderdale · hosted
As the event pages on processunity.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page processunity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ProcessUnity
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ProcessUnity is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ProcessUnity is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Third-Party Risk Management
- For
- Organizations of all sizes
- Price stated
- Explore Pricing Plans processunity.com
- Certifications
- Certified Sales ProfessionalCertified Pre-Sales ProfessionalCertified Platform SpecialistCertified Delivery Professional
- Customers named
- Accenture
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What ProcessUnity's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: processunity.com, processunity.com/tag/compliance, processunity.com/resources/case-studies, processunity.com/about-us/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProcessUnity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProcessUnity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProcessUnity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ProcessUnity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ProcessUnity, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.