AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › TPRM › UpGuard vs Drata
Third-party risk management · October 2026 Edition

UpGuard vs Drata

Ten of fourteen models named UpGuard first on the direct prompt; zero named Drata. UpGuard was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Drata by four and UpGuard carries 57 labels and Drata 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

UpGuard

endorsed leader

Named in six categories this edition.

Drata

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share55%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels5710A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, UpGuard reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Panorays was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. UpGuard vs Vanta · UpGuard vs Prevalent · UpGuard vs ProcessUnity

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the third-party risk management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UpGuardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDrata
Direct100
Paraphrase90
Comparative20
Budget-constrained80
Scale-constrained01
Negative102 against UpGuard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where UpGuard and Drata stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
UpGuard Drata first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, UpGuard on the left and Drata on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where UpGuard and Drata stood in it.

UpGuard first, Drata an alternative

10 of 14 modelsDrata was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashUpGuard alternatives: Drata, Panorays, Vanta, Venminder, Whistic
Perplexity SonarUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate, Panorays, StandardFusion
Grok 4.1 FastUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate Risk Cloud, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard
DeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate, Panorays, Prevalent, StandardFusion, Venminder
Qwen 3.7 FlashUpGuard alternatives: Panorays, Riskonnect, Sprinto, Vanta
Kimi K2UpGuard alternatives: Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Panorays
GLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuard alternatives: Panorays, SecurityScorecard, Vanta
MiniMax M2.5UpGuard alternatives: Panorays
GPT-6 LunaUpGuard alternatives: Vanta TPRM, Whistic
Muse Glimmer 30BUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate, LogicManager, Panorays, Whistic

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniProcessUnity alternatives: UpGuard, Vanta, Venminder, Whistic
Mistral SmallVanta alternatives: LogicGate, Panorays, StandardFusion, UpGuard
Llama 4 MaverickLogicGate alternatives: StandardFusion, UpGuard, Vanta

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
UpGuard leads by thirty-nine points.
UpGuard39%#1 of 9
Drata0%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
UpGuard leads by fifty-three points.
UpGuard55%#1 of 15
Drata2%#6 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
UpGuard leads by nine points.
UpGuard9%#4 of 14
Drata0%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about UpGuard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“reviews consistently flag limited customization and integration pain for UpGuard and Prevalent” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent for ratings, but cautious about the *full* TPRM lifecycle.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want a single recommendation for most limited-budget SMEs, UpGuard is the one most 2024-2025 round-ups name as the affordable, SME-friendly TPRM leader.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need a truly free start‑point: UpGuard's free tier or CyberGRX's free vendor assessment are the quickest ways to get baseline visibility.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For organizations focused on continuous cyber risk and attack‑surface visibility: UpGuard's continuous monitoring and scoring are a standout.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Drata

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.