Every category where a model named SecurityScorecard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Third-party risk management	Security operations	2%	6 of 72	21%	29	accepted challenger
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	55 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SecurityScorecard yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SecurityScorecard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	1	1	5
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	1	1	4
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct17 labelsNone

Paraphrase15 labelsNone

Comparative34 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels1

Scale-constrained9 labels1

Negative22 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative112 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your budget is exactly $0: Sign up for the free tiers of SecurityScorecard or UpGuard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · first choice

“For pure speed and scale: Start with SecurityScorecard or Bitsight for their outside-in visibility.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Focus on Closing Big Enterprise Deals | SecurityScorecard (To prove compliance to prospects)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ASM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“SecurityScorecard – Ratings-first, great for external monitoring, often paired with other tools.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · TPRM · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Most enterprise platforms (SecurityScorecard, Bitsight, Black Kite, Panorays, ProcessUnity, Prevalent) are quote-only, so budgets can balloon” DeepSeek V4 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · soft negative

“Platforms with known alert fatigue or false-positive concerns such as SecurityScorecard and Bitsight” Perplexity Sonar · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Quote-based pricing (e.g., SecurityScorecard) can surprise; small orgs report it's "very expensive"” Grok 4.1 Fast · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative

“SecurityScorecard used *without* a workflow engine ... Do not use these as your *only* tool” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SecurityScorecard, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SecurityScorecard was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bitsight93 of 1127Not in the top three

UpGuard82 of 11235Not in the top three

OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management79 of 1125Not in the top three

ProcessUnity62 of 11212Not in the top three

Prevalent58 of 1122Not in the top three

Vanta55 of 1127Not in the top three

Panorays48 of 1122Not in the top three

Archer35 of 1120Not in the top three

Venminder29 of 1124Not in the top three

Riskonnect24 of 1121Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SecurityScorecard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 112 answers that named SecurityScorecard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upguard.com86

bitsight.com55

gartner.com50

vanta.com43

learn.g2.com38

g2.com37

riskledger.com35

panorays.com30

projectmanagers.net27

riskonnect.com24

425 of the 425 domain citations in answers naming SecurityScorecard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

upguard.com/blog/best-third-party-risk-management-software-solutions76

bitsight.com/guides/best-third-party-risk-management-platforms-for-enterprises44

gartner.com/reviews/market/third-party-risk-management-technology-solutions40

learn.g2.com/best-third-party-risk-management-software38

vanta.com/resources/best-tprm-software-for-enterprises33

projectmanagers.net/best-third-party-risk-management-tools-for-small-businesses-top-tprm-p27

riskledger.com/resources/best-third-party-risk-management-software25

gartner.com/reviews/market/it-vendor-risk-management-solutions24

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SecurityScorecard

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SecurityScorecard; a claim can dispute any of them.

SecurityScorecard (Free Tier) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SecurityScorecard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SecurityScorecard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at security.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.