AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › TPRM › Panorays vs Drata
Third-party risk management · October 2026 Edition

Panorays vs Drata

Zero of fourteen models named Panorays first on the direct prompt; zero named Drata. Panorays was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Drata by four and Panorays carries 26 labels and Drata 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Panorays

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Drata

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2610A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Panorays reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UpGuard was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. UpGuard vs Panorays · UpGuard vs Drata · Vanta vs Panorays

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the third-party risk management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PanoraysFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDrata
Direct00
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained01
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Panorays and Drata stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Panorays Drata first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Panorays on the left and Drata on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Panorays and Drata stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashUpGuard alternatives: Drata, Panorays, Vanta, Venminder, Whistic
Perplexity SonarUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate, Panorays, StandardFusion
Mistral SmallVanta alternatives: LogicGate, Panorays, StandardFusion, UpGuard
DeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate, Panorays, Prevalent, StandardFusion, Venminder
Qwen 3.7 FlashUpGuard alternatives: Panorays, Riskonnect, Sprinto, Vanta
Kimi K2UpGuard alternatives: Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Panorays
GLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuard alternatives: Panorays, SecurityScorecard, Vanta
MiniMax M2.5UpGuard alternatives: Panorays
Muse Glimmer 30BUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate, LogicManager, Panorays, Whistic

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniProcessUnity alternatives: UpGuard, Vanta, Venminder, Whistic
Grok 4.1 FastUpGuard alternatives: LogicGate Risk Cloud, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard
Llama 4 MaverickLogicGate alternatives: StandardFusion, UpGuard, Vanta
GPT-6 LunaUpGuard alternatives: Vanta TPRM, Whistic

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Panorays0%#– of 9
Drata0%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Panorays2%#5 of 15
Drata2%#6 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Panorays0%#13 of 14
Drata0%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Panorays

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“I would recommend Panorays or UpGuard” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Evaluate Panorays if you need the deepest technical assessments and fastest time-to-insight for new vendors.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · alternative
“If you prioritize speed of deployment and ease of use, Panorays is highly recommended.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · alternative

What the models said about Drata

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared
UpGuard vs PanoraysUpGuard vs DrataVanta vs PanoraysVanta vs DrataPrevalent vs PanoraysPrevalent vs DrataProcessUnity vs PanoraysProcessUnity vs DrataPanorays vs LogicGateDrata vs LogicGateAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full TPRM standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.