IT AI Index
Index Vendors › OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management · September 2026 Edition
OneTrust · 1 category · Ranked

OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management

101Judge labels
5First choices
39Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in TPRM for enterprise buyers
Rank 19 of 72 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 37% of its 30 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In tprm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Third-party risk managementSecurity operations0%19 of 7237%30criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast01124
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash02035
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash02035
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels3
Paraphrase12 labels2
Comparative28 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative22 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative101 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Compliance-led programs, particularly those tying vendor risk to Privacy, ESG, and Data Governance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“OneTrust or ProcessUnity will provide better integration with your broader risk posture.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“OneTrust, Riskonnect, and MetricStream are best for deep GRC integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“OneTrust – Best if you need deep integration with a broader GRC/compliance stack.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · TPRM · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Caution level: High — especially for standalone vendor risk teams... "OneTrust's TPRM is absolute garbage except for the questionnaire function."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · TPRM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Most enterprise tools (OneTrust, ProcessUnity) start at $50K+ annually—unsuitable for limited budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · TPRM · budget prompt · hard negative
“Most traditional TPRM platforms (like OneTrust, ServiceNow, or Prevalent) have entry-level costs ranging from $10,000 to $20,000+ per year, making them inaccessible” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · soft negative
“OneTrust and similar broad compliance platforms sometimes receive criticism for: Feature bloat that obscures core TPRM functionality” Kimi K2 · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, over the 101 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SecurityScorecard79 of 1012Not in the top three
Bitsight75 of 1019Not in the top three
UpGuard72 of 10126Not in the top three
ProcessUnity70 of 10112Not in the top three
Prevalent56 of 1013Not in the top three
Panorays41 of 1013Not in the top three
Vanta40 of 1017Not in the top three
Archer40 of 1010Not in the top three
Riskonnect31 of 1012Not in the top three
Venminder24 of 1013Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 101 answers that named OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upguard.com76
bitsight.com55
gartner.com51
vanta.com38
riskledger.com33
learn.g2.com30
panorays.com28
g2.com25
riskonnect.com25
riskpublishing.com22

383 of the 383 domain citations in answers naming OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
OneTrust 26OneTrust (TPRM Module) 1OneTrust (Vendor Risk) 1OneTrust Vendor Risk Management 1OneTrust Vendorpedia 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onetrust.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack