Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 8% → 5%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 62
4 categories · RankedSecureframe
244Judge labels
20First choices
31Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Compliance automation for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 67 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 53 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Secureframe →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 65
6%51 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 67
7%53 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 54
2%32 labels
criticized challenger
In compliance automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Secureframe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 7% | 4 of 67 | 8% | 53 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 5% | 6 of 75 | 18% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 2% | 9 of 87 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Breach and attack simulation | Security operations | 2% | 13 of 74 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Secureframe held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Compliance automation · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 64
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 51
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | 4% | 8% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 4 of 67 |
| GRC | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 6 of 75 |
| TPRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 9 of 87 |
| BAS | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 13 of 74, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Secureframe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Secureframe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct37 labels3
Paraphrase38 labels3
Comparative56 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained37 labels7
Scale-constrained33 labels7
Negative43 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative244 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall for limited budget: Secureframe — often positioned as the more budget-conscious choice for early-stage companies” GPT-5.4 mini · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice
“Consider vendors like Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, or similar platforms that specialize in mid-market compliance automation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compliance automation · scale prompt · first choice
“Secureframe — Best Overall Budget Option ... Go with Secureframe — it's the most cost-effective solution” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“Secureframe is positioned as the budget leader: "Best when budget is the hard constraint: Secureframe"” Muse Glimmer 30B · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“and Secureframe are powerful but generally priced for venture-backed startups” Kimi K2 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Tools like Vanta, Drata, or Secureframe.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · budget prompt · hard negative
“even capable tools like Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, and Sprinto require significant internal investment to operate effectively” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited customization options are frustrating, particularly for complex workflows and specific regional requirements.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Secureframe, over the 244 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Secureframe was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Secureframe, over the 244 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Secureframe was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Secureframe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 232 of the 244 answers that named Secureframe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vanta.com136
orbiqhq.com90
complyjet.com86
g2.com69
sprinto.com69
expertinsights.com60
learn.g2.com60
optro.ai52
riskwatch.com46
us.fitgap.com43
711 of the 711 domain citations in answers naming Secureframe came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
secureframe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Secureframe takes 7% of first choices and Drata takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
secureframe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Secureframe takes 7% of first choices and Drata takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compliance automation platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance automation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“secureframe”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 39 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 45,014 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 13,988 · 475 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,603
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 4 of 67 in compliance automation
Segment leader
34%
Drata
- First choices
- 20 across its categories
- Named in
- 244 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 232 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on secureframe.com
8,680
subdomains included
Content
1,642
counted in the table below
Documentation
410
Product · Integration
48 · 5,019
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 909 | 28 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 349 | 0 | 2025-05-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 116 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| News or press | 97 | 2 | 2026-08-16 | ||
| Comparison | 82 | 3 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Case study | 64 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Ai penetration testing blog
- 2026-09-23Risk management frameworks blog
- 2026-09-22Sbom requirements defense contractors blog
- 2026-09-17Data retention policy blog
- 2026-09-15Fedramp 20x moderate class c blog
- 2026-09-09Password policy blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page secureframe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Secureframe
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Secureframe; a claim can dispute any of them.
SecureFrame 1Sprinto / Secureframe 1
Follow Secureframe
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Secureframe is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Secureframe is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automate compliance. Improve security. Reduce risk.
- For
- Small Business, Enterprise, Defense contractors
- Price stated
- Starting at $7,000/year secureframe.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 7000 secureframe.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 300 secureframe.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001HIPAAPCI DSSGDPRSOC 2 Type 2FedRAMP 20x Low AuthorizedCMMC Level 2 Authorized
- Hosting
- United StatesLondon
- Customers named
- CodaStreamPerkUpKinectifyPrizePicksOTH SecurityAbmatic AIBase Power
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial
What Secureframe's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: secureframe.com, secureframe.com/pricing, trust.secureframe.com, secureframe.com/features/ai, secureframe.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secureframe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secureframe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Secureframe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Secureframe is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Secureframe, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.