3 categories · RankedSecureframe
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 4% | 6 of 54 | 17% | 53 | accepted challenger |
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 2% | 12 of 77 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 28 of 72 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Secureframe - Best for growing multi-framework teams... suitable for SaaS companies pursuing ISO 27001 and SOC 2 simultaneously.” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“shortlist 3–4 from the compliance-automation/mid-market category (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, LogicGate...)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · scale prompt · first choice
“Secureframe is the strongest default” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compliance automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Secureframe if you want structured guidance and want to bundle your compliance software with services like pen-testing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance automation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“frequently cited as platforms to be cautious about rather than outright avoid, specifically regarding long-term cost and vendor lock-in” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“rigid platforms like Secureframe may force you to adapt your compliance program to the software” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compliance automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“quote-based pricing (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, OneTrust) and can run $10,000-$80,000+/year” MiniMax M2.5 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · soft negative
“security veterans warn against relying on them for actual enterprise risk management” Gemini 3.5 Flash · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 161 of the 188 answers that named Secureframe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
468 of the 468 domain citations in answers naming Secureframe came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Secureframe
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secureframe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secureframe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at secureframe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.