Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 52 → 49 of 58
4 categories · RankedLogicGate Risk Cloud
49Judge labels
5First choices
6Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in GRC for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LogicGate Risk Cloud →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business51 of 60
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 75
3%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise26 of 67
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LogicGate Risk Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 3% | 9 of 75 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 14 of 67 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 0% | 30 of 116 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% | |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 22 of 87 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LogicGate Risk Cloud held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 3 → 11 of 69
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 23 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 11% | 2% | ▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 9 of 75 |
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 14 of 67 |
| Cyber risk quant | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 116, unchanged |
| TPRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 22 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LogicGate Risk Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LogicGate Risk Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels3
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LogicGate Risk Cloud is frequently cited as an excellent choice for mid-sized companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · GRC · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Frequently positioned as the mid-market / configurable workflow option.” Muse Glimmer 30B · GRC · direct prompt · first choice
“If you need deeper configurable GRC workflows with governance and risk management, LogicGate or ZenGRC are excellent choices.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · direct prompt · alternative
“if your organization needs highly customized workflows without coding, LogicGate might be better suited” MiniMax M2.5 · GRC · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Higher price range ($25K–$150K+/year) ... Better suited for very complex enterprise risk programs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogicGate Risk Cloud, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogicGate Risk Cloud was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogicGate Risk Cloud, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogicGate Risk Cloud was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LogicGate Risk Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 49 answers that named LogicGate Risk Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
complyjet.com22
orbiqhq.com20
vanta.com20
riskwatch.com18
zengrc.com15
surecloud.com14
expertinsights.com13
g2.com11
itechguides.com11
logicgate.ai11
155 of the 155 domain citations in answers naming LogicGate Risk Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
logicgate.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LogicGate Risk Cloud takes 3% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
logicgate.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LogicGate Risk Cloud takes 3% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “grc platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “grc platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“logicgate risk cloud”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,071 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,987 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,057
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 9 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 49 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 49 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on logicgate.com
1,364
subdomains included
Content
742
counted in the table below
Documentation
122
Product · Integration
73 · 263
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 358 | 17 | 2026-09-24 | GRC, TPRM | |
| News or press | 226 | 0 | 2023-02-21 | GRC, TPRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 53 | 0 | 2025-10-22 | GRC, TPRM | |
| Report or ebook | 44 | 0 | 2026-03-04 | GRC, TPRM | |
| Conference or event | 17 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | GRC | |
| Podcast or video | 13 | 0 | 2022-09-12 | GRC, TPRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | GRC | |
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | GRC | |
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2025-03-05 | GRC | |
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-06-13 | GRC |
Most recent
- 2026-09-245 grc trends reshaping hospitality retail blog
- 2026-09-22Why you cant vibe code a holistic grc program blog
- 2026-09-21How to manage ai risks a practical framework blog
- 2026-09-18Logicgate named a leader in the idc marketscape for third party risk management software blog
- 2026-09-16Logicgate named a g2 leader for the 29th consecutive quarter blog
- 2026-09-1410 essential grc software features for global companies in 2026 blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 2, 2026 to June 3, 2026Agility UKBankside Hotel, London · took part
- May 12, 2026 to May 13, 2026Agility 2026 conferenceThe Westin Chicago River North, Chicago · took part
As the event pages on logicgate.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page logicgate.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LogicGate Risk Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
LogicGate Risk Cloud (From $69/month) 1
Follow LogicGate Risk Cloud
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LogicGate Risk Cloud is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LogicGate Risk Cloud is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered GRC platform with 30+ applications for enterprise risk management, third-party risk management, cyber risk management, and compliance.
- For
- Enterprise
- Price stated
- Custom enterprise pricing, request a demo for details. logicgate.com
- Starting price
- 0 logicgate.com
- Integrations claimed
- 200 logicgate.com
- Certifications
- Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for GRC Tools, Assurance LeadersLeader in The Forrester Wave™: Third-Party Risk Management Platforms, Q1 2026See why LogicGate is a Leader in The Forrester Wave™: Governance, Risk, And Compliance Platforms, Q2 2026SOC 2 Type IIISO 2700121 C.F.R. Part 11CSAEU-US DPF
- Hosting
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustraliaEU
- Customers named
- EquinitiAnsamcalBillgoBCU
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial
What LogicGate Risk Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: logicgate.com, trust.logicgate.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogicGate Risk Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogicGate Risk Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LogicGate Risk Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LogicGate Risk Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LogicGate Risk Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.