| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 11% | 3 of 77 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 24 of 54 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37% |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 26 of 72 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LogicGate Risk Cloud is the best fit for many mid-market teams because it is specifically described as a no-code GRC option for mid-market organizations” Perplexity Sonar · GRC · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LogicGate Risk Cloud is the best general-purpose pick because it is repeatedly positioned as the mid-market-friendly, no-code option” Perplexity Sonar · GRC · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market ... I'd recommend starting with LogicGate Risk Cloud or ZenGRC” MiniMax M2.5 · GRC · direct prompt · first choice
“My top pick for most mid-market B2B companies: LogicGate for flexibility” Kimi K2 · GRC · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 42 answers that named LogicGate Risk Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming LogicGate Risk Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogicGate Risk Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogicGate Risk Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at logicgate.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.